Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

UK Shared Prosperity Fund: Implications for Scotland - Amendment

  • Submitted by: Liz Smith, Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party.
  • Date lodged: Tuesday, 26 April 2022
  • Motion reference: S6M-04159.1
  • Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Wednesday, 27 April 2022

As an amendment to motion S6M-04159 in the name of Richard Lochhead (UK Shared Prosperity Fund: Implications for Scotland), leave out from “agrees” to end and insert “warmly welcomes the UK Government’s Levelling Up agenda, including the Shared Prosperity Fund, which will replace previous EU Structural Funds and which will provide £212 million of funding to Scotland by 2024-25, and further welcomes the UK Government’s focus on boosting productivity, skills, innovation, jobs and sustainable economic growth across Scotland, and on increasing the transparency of funding and the accountability for decision-making across Scotland’s local communities.”


Vote

Result 28 for, 82 against, 0 abstained, 19 did not vote Vote Defeated

Scottish National Party

Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Scottish Labour

Scottish Green Party

Scottish Liberal Democrats

For
0
Against
Abstained
0
Did not vote

No Party Affiliation

For
0
Against
0
Abstained
0
Did not vote

Related motion

Motion ref. S6M-04159

UK Shared Prosperity Fund: Implications for Scotland

Submitted by: Richard Lochhead, Moray, Scottish National Party, Date lodged: Monday, April 25, 2022

Supported by: Tom Arthur, Foysol Choudhury, Kate Forbes, Jenny Gilruth, Michael Matheson, Màiri McAllan, Ivan McKee
Current status: Taken in the chamber on Wednesday, April 27, 2022

Result 81 for, 28 against, 0 abstained, 20 did not vote Vote Passed


Defeated related amendments

Motion ref. S6M-04159.2

UK Shared Prosperity Fund: Implications for Scotland - Amendment - Amendment

Submitted by: Daniel Johnson, Edinburgh Southern, Scottish Labour, Date lodged: Tuesday, April 26, 2022

Supported by: Foysol Choudhury, Paul Sweeney
Current status: Taken in the chamber on Wednesday, April 27, 2022

Result 19 for, 91 against, 0 abstained, 19 did not vote Vote Defeated