Skip to main content
Loading…

Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs)

Image description

Craig Hoy

Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

MSP for South Scotland (Region) 2021 - present day

About Craig Hoy

Contact details

Contact online

Website: craighoy.co.uk

X (previously known as Twitter): @CraigWHoy1/

Facebook: Craig's facebook

Contact at the Scottish Parliament

The Scottish Parliament
Edinburgh
EH99 1SP

Phone: 0131 348 6976
Text relay calls welcome.

Contact at local office

1 High Street
Haddington
EH41 3ES

Phone: 01620 849350
Text relay calls welcome.

Find out when the MSP's surgery times are on their website.

Committees

Craig is a member of 2 committees

Cross-party groups

Craig is not a member of any cross-party groups

Parliamentary and Government Roles

Craig does not have any parliamentary or government roles

Party Roles

Craig has 2 party roles

Party Spokesperson on Finance

Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Party Spokesperson on Local Government

Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Previous roles

Craig has had 6 previous roles

Previous roles in cross-party groups are not included in this list.

09 May 2022 - 16 November 2024

Party Chairman

Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

25 May 2022 - 10 October 2024

Equalities Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Substitute Member

17 June 2021 - 29 June 2023

Public Audit Committee

Member

21 May 2021 - 28 June 2023

Deputy Party Spokesperson on Mental Health

Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

21 May 2021 - 28 June 2023

Deputy Party Spokesperson on Social Care

Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

17 June 2021 - 25 May 2022

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Member

Register of interests

Craig's register of interests

MSPs must provide details of their financial interests in the Register of Interests. They make an initial statement on becoming or being returned as an MSP. This is then updated with any changes they provide.

Recent Activity

What was said

What Craig Hoy has said in Parliament

These are the official transcripts of what was said by this MSP in the chamber and at committee meetings. You'll find the topic discussed and how many times this MSP has contributed to the discussion.

“Cities Outlook 2026”

Chamber meeting date: 4 February 2026

Craig Hoy (South Scotland) (Con): "Who started it?"

Points of Order

Chamber meeting date: 4 February 2026

Craig Hoy (South Scotland) (Con): "On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I seek your guidance as to how a cabinet secretary can correct the record in this place…

Local Government Finance Settlements (Rurality)

Chamber meeting date: 4 February 2026

Craig Hoy (South Scotland) (Con): "If the rural funding formula for councils is working and is fair, why is SNP-run Dumfries and Galloway Council currently consulting on the ending of free music tuition, removing funding for school-based police officers, shutting the Hillview leisure centre in Kelloholm and scaling back on gritting the roads across the region?"

“Cities Outlook 2026”

Chamber meeting date: 4 February 2026

Craig Hoy (South Scotland) (Con): "Who started it?"

Draft Budget 2026-27 (Discussions with COSLA)

Chamber meeting date: 4 February 2026

Craig Hoy (South Scotland) (Con): "This morning, I met Councillor Ricky Bell from COSLA, which remains extremely concerned about the budget settlement, particularly the Scottish Government’s failure to fully fund living wage pay increases and the resulting cash crisis that health and social care partnerships face. On the budget and the spending review settlement, the Institute for…

Votes

How Craig Hoy has voted in Parliament

Find out how Craig Hoy has voted recently.

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill

Motion ref. S6M-20606

Submitted by: Monica Lennon, Central Scotland, Scottish Labour. Date lodged: Wednesday, January 28, 2026

Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Thursday, February 5, 2026

Result 90 for, 26 against, 4 abstained, 9 did not vote

MSP not voted

Agreed

Opposing the Scottish Government's Proposed Council Tax Rises

Motion ref. S6M-20654.1

Submitted by: Michael Marra, North East Scotland, Scottish Labour. Date lodged: Tuesday, February 3, 2026

Supported by: Mark Griffin
Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Wednesday, February 4, 2026

Result 23 for, 94 against, 1 abstained, 11 did not vote

MSP voted against

Disagreed

Opposing the Scottish Government's Proposed Council Tax Rises

Motion ref. S6M-20654

Submitted by: Craig Hoy, South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party. Date lodged: Monday, February 2, 2026

Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Wednesday, February 4, 2026

Result 59 for, 58 against, 0 abstained, 12 did not vote

MSP voted against

Agreed

Approval of SI

Motion ref. S6M-20670

Submitted by: Graeme Dey, Angus South, Scottish National Party. Date lodged: Tuesday, February 3, 2026

Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Wednesday, February 4, 2026

Result 93 for, 3 against, 17 abstained, 16 did not vote

MSP voted against

Agreed

Saving Scottish Hospitality

Motion ref. S6M-20653

Submitted by: Murdo Fraser, Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party. Date lodged: Monday, February 2, 2026

Current status: Taken in the Chamber on Wednesday, February 4, 2026

Result 59 for, 59 against, 0 abstained, 11 did not vote

MSP voted against

Disagreed

Motions

Motions made by Craig Hoy in Parliament

Find out what motions Craig Hoy has submitted recently.

Questions

Questions Craig Hoy has asked

These are the questions that this MSP has asked in Parliament. It also includes any answer to those questions.

Question reference: S6W-43275

Asked by: Craig Hoy, South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Date lodged: 23 January 2026

Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 6 February 2026

"To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether its presentation of the local government settlement is consistent with recent independent analysis that suggests that the real-terms increase is closer to 0…

Question reference: S6W-43271

Asked by: Craig Hoy, South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Date lodged: 23 January 2026

Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 6 February 2026

"To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether removing in-year funding provided to local authorities in 2025–26 from the baseline used for comparison has the effect of increasing the apparent real-terms growth rate for 2026–27."

Question reference: S6W-43277

Asked by: Craig Hoy, South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Date lodged: 23 January 2026

Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 6 February 2026

"To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether its presentation of the local government settlement announced in its draft Budget 2026-27 as a fair deal risks overstating local authorities’ room for manoeuvre when they are facing ongoing cost pressures that were funded through in-year top-ups in 2025–26."

Question reference: S6W-43274

Asked by: Craig Hoy, South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Date lodged: 23 January 2026

Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 6 February 2026

"To ask the Scottish Government whether it would expect independent analysts to be able to replicate its real-terms funding comparisons using published budget documents, and what steps it has taken to ensure that the calculation of the claimed 2% real-terms increase of its draft Budget 2026-27 can be independently verified."

Question reference: S6W-43272

Asked by: Craig Hoy, South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Date lodged: 23 January 2026

Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 6 February 2026

"To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide information on the reason why (a) it uses the Autumn Budget Revision (ABR) when presenting year-on-year changes in portfolio funding and (b) a different approach has been applied to local government funding in the calculation of the claimed 2% real-terms increase."

Question reference: S6W-43276

Asked by: Craig Hoy, South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Date lodged: 23 January 2026

Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 6 February 2026

"To ask the Scottish Government, regarding its draft Budget 2026-27, what its position is on whether its presentation of a 2% real-terms increase in local government funding is consistent with recent independent analysis suggesting that local authorities may need to increase council tax by around 8% on average in order to maintain current levels of…

Question reference: S6W-43278

Asked by: Craig Hoy, South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Date lodged: 23 January 2026

Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 6 February 2026

"To ask the Scottish Government, in light of reported suggestions from independent analysts of significant council tax rises, what assessment it has made of any impact on public understanding of local government finances of its presentation of a headline 2% real-terms increase in its draft Budget 2026-27."

Question reference: S6W-43279

Asked by: Craig Hoy, South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Date lodged: 23 January 2026

Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 6 February 2026

"To ask the Scottish Government what value of in-year funding provided to local government in 2025–26 has been excluded from the baseline used to calculate the real-terms change in funding in its draft Budget 2026-27."

Question reference: S6W-43273

Asked by: Craig Hoy, South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Date lodged: 23 January 2026

Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 6 February 2026

"To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether its standard practice is to use the latest available Autumn Budget Revision (ABR) as the prior-year comparator when presenting real-terms changes."

Question reference: S6W-42760

Asked by: Craig Hoy, South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Date lodged: 19 December 2025

Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 16 January 2026

"To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the quality, completeness and reliability of the new data used in the revised social care funding formula, including how that data was validated, whether any known limitations were identified, and, if so, how those limitations were communicated to the Settlement and Distribution Group…

Share this page