- Asked by: Jamie Halcro Johnston, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Siobhian Brown on 1 April 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what additional support is being provided to the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service to ensure that it is adequately resourced to handle any increase in incidents arising from the presence of battery energy storage systems.
Answer
The Scottish Government has allocated the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service £412.2 million for 2025-26 to ensure it is properly resourced to keep Scotland safe and provide all of its statutory functions. The budget for 2025-26 is £18.8m higher than 2024-25 and while clearly decisions on how its budget is spent are a matter for the SFRS Board and Chief Fire Officer, SFRS continue to respond to every emergency incident with the appropriate level of resources.
SFRS continually review and develop its operational response to any new and emerging technology or site to keep communities safe and ensure the highest level of preparedness.
- Asked by: Jamie Halcro Johnston, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 1 April 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how it ensures that communities in remote, rural and island areas are actively involved in decision-making processes regarding their healthcare services.
Answer
NHS Boards and IJBs have a statutory duty to involve people and communities in the planning and development of care services. Revised joint guidance with COSLA, Planning with People, supports Health Boards, local authorities and IJBs in engaging with local communities on the health and social care services they provide. Planning with People sets out actions that should be taken when changes to services are being considered, and emphasises that community engagement and active participation of people is essential.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Allan on 1 April 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to its engagement with the UK Government on proposed reforms to electricity infrastructure consenting in Scotland, how it plans to respond to reported objections that introducing new fees for pre-application functions and necessary wayleaves could disadvantage smaller developers or community-led projects, and what steps it will take to ensure transparency around how any such fees are used.
Answer
The proposed reforms will apply to applications for consent under section 36 and section 37 of the Electricity Act 1989 made to Scottish Ministers. Section 36 applications made to Scottish Ministers have a capacity of over 50MW. Therefore, it is not anticipated that the reforms will disadvantage smaller developers or community-led projects.
The costs of providing pre-application services and processing necessary wayleaves are currently paid for through the Scottish Budget. These new powers will allow the Scottish Government to set fees to recover these costs from service users. The standard approach to setting fee levels will be full cost recovery in accordance with guidance set out in the Scottish Public Finance Manual and the introduction of these new fees will all be subject to consultation.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Allan on 1 April 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to its engagement with the UK Government on proposed reforms to electricity infrastructure consenting in Scotland and in light of reported criticism from stakeholders, what its reasons are for including the proposed powers for the Scottish Government to vary consents unilaterally, and whether it will reconsider these to safeguard investor confidence and community engagement.
Answer
The scope of the proposed reforms to vary consents without an application will be limited to variations and will not include suspension or revocation of consents. Interested parties will be notified of the proposal and given the opportunity to make representations. Where the variation proposed by the Scottish Government is to amend the consent or its conditions or both due to a change in environmental circumstances or relevant technological changes, the agreement of the consent-holder will be required.
Separately, the proposed reforms intend that the Scottish Government will be enabled to correct errors or omissions made in a consent, where the consent-holder would be notified of the proposed variation and given the opportunity to make representations to the Scottish Government.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Allan on 1 April 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to its engagement with the UK Government on proposed reforms to electricity infrastructure consenting in Scotland, what its position is regarding reported concerns that the reforms to pre-application consultation for electricity infrastructure projects will reduce opportunities for meaningful community input.
Answer
The proposed reforms will make pre-application consultation for electricity infrastructure projects a statutory requirement. This will increase opportunities for meaningful community input.
- Asked by: Liz Smith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 31 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 1 April 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the recent NASUWT survey, which recorded that 49% of female teachers in Scotland had reported physical abuse or violence in the last 12 months.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 1 April 2025
- Asked by: Katy Clark, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 31 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 3 April 2025
To ask the First Minister what the Scottish Government's position is on whether the reported increased annual cost of Scotland's prisons to over £77,000 per prisoner represents good value for public money.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 3 April 2025
- Asked by: Russell Findlay, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 31 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 3 April 2025
Question to be taken in Chamber.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 3 April 2025
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 31 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 3 April 2025
To ask the First Minister what engagement the Scottish Government has had with the UK Government regarding what assessment has been made of the potential impact of an extension of US tariffs on Scottish businesses that export to the US market.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 3 April 2025
- Asked by: Anas Sarwar, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 31 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 3 April 2025
Question to be taken in Chamber.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 3 April 2025