- Asked by: Alexander Stewart, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 19 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 5 January 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how many properties will be subject to the higher property rate poundage in 2023-24, broken down by (a) industry sector and (b) local authority area.
Answer
The number of properties expected to be liable for the Higher Property Rate (HPR) in 2023-24 before any reliefs are applied is presented in the below tables, broken down in Table 1 by property class, and in Table 2 by local authority. Property class is a classification used by Scottish Assessors to describe the type of property, and does not necessarily accurately reflect the use of a property. The Scottish Government does not hold property-level data on industry sectors.
These tables are based on an imputed Valuation Roll based on an incomplete draft Valuation Roll, as used by the Scottish Fiscal Commission in Scotland’s Economic and Fiscal Forecasts December 2022, and figures are therefore subject to change.
Figures in these tables are rounded to the nearest 10, with values greater than zero but lower than five displayed as ‘[low]’.
Table 1: Number of properties liable for HPR in 2023-24 by property class
Property class | Properties with a gross HPR liability |
Shops | 2,390 |
Public Houses | 180 |
Offices | 1,760 |
Hotels | 580 |
Industrial Subjects | 2,520 |
Leisure, Entertainment, Caravans etc. | 510 |
Garages and Petrol Stations | 150 |
Cultural | 90 |
Sporting Subjects | 20 |
Education and Training | 1,390 |
Public Service Subjects | 500 |
Communications | 90 |
Quarries, Mines, etc. | 40 |
Petrochemical | 70 |
Religious | 40 |
Health and Medical | 280 |
Other | 240 |
Care Facilities | 350 |
Advertising | 10 |
Statutory Undertaking | 370 |
Not in use | 0 |
All | 11,570 |
Table 2: Number of properties liable for HPR in 2023-24 by local authority
Local authority | Properties with a gross HPR liability |
Aberdeen City | 1,040 |
Aberdeenshire | 530 |
Angus | 140 |
Argyll & Bute | 150 |
Clackmannanshire | 50 |
Dumfries & Galloway | 200 |
Dundee City | 350 |
East Ayrshire | 140 |
East Dunbartonshire | 110 |
East Lothian | 140 |
East Renfrewshire | 80 |
City of Edinburgh | 1,720 |
Na h-Eileanan Siar | 50 |
Falkirk | 290 |
Fife | 510 |
Glasgow City | 1,830 |
Highland | 600 |
Inverclyde | 110 |
Midlothian | 170 |
Moray | 200 |
North Ayrshire | 170 |
North Lanarkshire | 570 |
Orkney Islands | 30 |
Perth & Kinross | 280 |
Renfrewshire | 380 |
Scottish Borders | 170 |
Shetland Islands | 60 |
South Ayrshire | 200 |
South Lanarkshire | 540 |
Stirling | 210 |
West Dunbartonshire | 130 |
West Lothian | 420 |
Scotland | 11,570 |
- Asked by: Alexander Stewart, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 19 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 5 January 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how many properties in 2023-24 will be subject to the intermediate property rate, broken down by (a) industry sector and (b) local authority area.
Answer
The number of properties expected to be liable for the Intermediate Property Rate (IPR) in 2023-24 before any reliefs are applied is presented in the below tables, broken down in Table 1 by property class, and in Table 2 by local authority. Property class is a classification used by Scottish Assessors to describe the type of property, and does not necessarily accurately reflect the use of a property. The Scottish Government does not hold property-level data on industry sectors.
These tables are based on an imputed Valuation Roll based on an incomplete draft Valuation Roll, as used by the Scottish Fiscal Commission in Scotland’s Economic and Fiscal Forecasts December 2022, and figures are therefore subject to change.
Figures in these tables are rounded to the nearest 10, with values greater than zero but lower than five displayed as ‘[low]’.
Table 1: Number of properties liable for IPR in 2023-24 by property class
Property class | Properties with a gross IPR liability |
Shops | 2,120 |
Public Houses | 420 |
Offices | 1,800 |
Hotels | 370 |
Industrial Subjects | 2,380 |
Leisure, Entertainment, Caravans etc. | 470 |
Garages and Petrol Stations | 190 |
Cultural | 90 |
Sporting Subjects | 30 |
Education and Training | 730 |
Public Service Subjects | 500 |
Communications | 30 |
Quarries, Mines, etc. | 50 |
Petrochemical | 10 |
Religious | 90 |
Health and Medical | 260 |
Other | 190 |
Care Facilities | 510 |
Advertising | 20 |
Statutory Undertaking | 150 |
Not in Use | 0 |
All | 10,400 |
Table 2: Number of properties liable for IPR in 2023-24 by local authority
Local authority | Properties with a gross IPR liability |
Aberdeen City | 830 |
Aberdeenshire | 450 |
Angus | 120 |
Argyll & Bute | 140 |
Clackmannanshire | 60 |
Dumfries & Galloway | 220 |
Dundee City | 320 |
East Ayrshire | 160 |
East Dunbartonshire | 110 |
East Lothian | 140 |
East Renfrewshire | 60 |
City of Edinburgh | 1,510 |
Na h-Eileanan Siar | 50 |
Falkirk | 200 |
Fife | 540 |
Glasgow City | 1,660 |
Highland | 590 |
Inverclyde | 80 |
Midlothian | 170 |
Moray | 150 |
North Ayrshire | 170 |
North Lanarkshire | 500 |
Orkney Islands | 40 |
Perth & Kinross | 270 |
Renfrewshire | 320 |
Scottish Borders | 180 |
Shetland Islands | 60 |
South Ayrshire | 170 |
South Lanarkshire | 430 |
Stirling | 190 |
West Dunbartonshire | 120 |
West Lothian | 390 |
Scotland | 10,400 |
- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-12031 by Mairi Gougeon on 17 November 2022, which 16 organisations that applied to the Ayrshire Rural and Islands Ambition (ARIA) Fund progressed from the technical check stage to the assessment stage; which organisation failed the technical check process, and what the technical check was that it failed.
Answer
The outcome of the technical checks is detailed in the following table:
Project/Organisation | Decision |
Carbon Reduction – Adventure Centre for Education | Approved |
Dunlop Dairy Cheese Shop & Tasting Room | Deferred |
Disabled access plus Disabled Toilet and Additional Toilet – Hareshaw Community Hall SCIO | Approved |
Renewable Energy Infrastructure to New Tourist Accommodation Development – Millport, Jack Alt Stays | Approved |
Little Peru Green Start, Little Peru Ltd | Deferred |
The Community Regeneration of Millport Town Hall Ltd | Rejected |
Arran Green Funding for Future – Arran Pioneer CIC | Rejected |
Gaiety on Tour – Ayr Gaiety Partnership | Approved |
The Geisland Project – Beith CDT | Approved |
Access to Community for All – Crossroads Community Hubs Ltd | Approved |
Ailsa Craig Visitor Centre for Feasibility Study – Girvan Town Team (on behalf of Girvan Community Led Tourism) | Approved |
Brand Ambassador/Distillery Production Assistant – Isle of Cumbrae Distiller | Approved |
Paths Network Feasibility Study – Kirkimichael Village Renaissance | Deferred |
Newmilns Regeneration Feasibility Study – Newmilns Regeneration Association | Deferred |
Business Sustainability and Resilience Advisor – Visit Arran Ltd | Approved |
Opportunities for All – Crossroads Community Hub Ltd | Approved |
Where a project is noted as ‘deferred’ this means that a final decision by the LAG is pending.
The application for The Community Regeneration of Millport Town Hall Ltd was rejected due to:
- The lack of fit with the project itself (not completion of the town hall) and ARIA fund priorities. The Local Action Group considered the application did not make a strong enough link between the project and completion of the town hall to validate the priorities selected.
- There was concern over the fire safety aspects at such a late stage in the overall project.
The application for the Arran Green Funding for Future (Arran Pioneer CIC) was rejected due to:
- A lack of project outcomes being fully determined or specified.
- The Local Action Group questioned the eligibility of the project under the guidance requirement for technical/feasibility studies to fully determine the project outcome.
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 06 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government how many road accidents, where a defective/poor road surface was recorded as a contributory factor, there have been in each of the last five years, broken down by local authority area.
Answer
In response to your query, my officials have provided the data below as requested.
The following table shows the number of accidents where a defective or poor road surface was a contributory factor.
Council | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
Aberdeen City | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Aberdeenshire | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Angus | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Argyll & Bute | 5 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
Clackmannanshire | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Dumfries & Galloway | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Dundee City | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
East Ayrshire | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
East Dunbartonshire | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
East Lothian | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
East Renfrewshire | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Edinburgh, City of | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Falkirk | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Fife | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
Glasgow City | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Highland | 7 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Midlothian | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Moray | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
North Ayrshire | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
North Lanarkshire | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Perth & Kinross | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Renfrewshire | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Scottish Borders | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
Shetland Islands | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
South Ayrshire | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
South Lanarkshire | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
Stirling | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
West Dunbartonshire | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
West Lothian | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Total | 49 | 50 | 38 | 23 | 34 |
The data in the table above is collected as part of the wider collation of data on road casualties, which informs our road safety publications. Statistical data on road casualties are reported annually by Transport Scotland in two publications, Key Reported Road Casualties in the Spring of each year, and Reported Road Casualties Scotland, in the Autumn of each year. Provisional figures for 2022 are not available yet.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether a fish farm company application for a European Protected Species Licence to use Acoustic Deterrent Devices (ADDs) or Acoustic Startle Devices (ASDs) would be refused unless the applicant has provided strong and robust evidence that all alternatives such as fitment of double skinned anti-predator nets, recirculating aquaculture systems, semi-closed containment and/or relocation of the farm have been tried.
Answer
A licence to disturb European protected species (“EPS”) can only be granted if three licensing tests are met, including that there is no satisfactory alternative to the proposed action.
Marine Scotland has published a document that provides guidance and advice for any aquaculture production business that wishes to apply for a licence to disturb EPS as a result of ADD use –
faq_adds_and_eps_including_annex_1_and_annex_2_-_version_5_-october_2021_-_final.pdf (marine.gov.scot) . Applicants are required to provide an analysis of alternative methods of predator control tried or considered and if they have been discounted provide reasons for this. All EPS licence applications are considered on a cases by case basis and it would not be appropriate to pre-determine the outcome of the satisfactory alternative test without consideration of any justification provided by the applicant.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, when considering European Protected Species Licence applications, whether it will reject calculations to determine how many cetaceans would be disturbed or injured by an Acoustic Deterrent Device (ADD) if those calculations are based on an incorrect assumption that cetaceans are evenly spread over a large sea area and do not travel in pods or favour certain areas.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-13105 on 23 December 2022. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, when considering European Protected Species Licence applications, whether it will reject calculations to determine how many cetaceans would be disturbed or injured by an Acoustic Deterrent Device (ADD) based on a model that can only predict how many will be disturbed at one moment in time and makes no allowance for the movement of the animals during the periods of time the device is operating.
Answer
All applications for EPS licences are considered on a case by cases basis and it is expected that applicants use appropriate models and calculations such as those set out in the Marine Scotland guidance document - faq_adds_and_eps_including_annex_1_and_annex_2_-_version_5_-october_2021_-_final.pdf (marine.gov.scot) . Relevant models use data that is the best current representation of the locations where cetaceans are expected to be found.
Marine Scotland is currently updating this guidance document to include finer resolution species density surfaces and this will be published early in 2023. All applications for EPS licences will be expected to follow the updated guidance.
- Asked by: Jamie Greene, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to deaths in custody determined to be suicides, in how many instances were (a) non-prescription and (b) illegal drugs found or suspected to be present in the deceased, including in cases where this was detected following a toxicology report, in each year since 2016.
Answer
The Scottish Prison Service publish information regarding all deaths in SPS custody on a quarterly basis, which includes the ‘medical certificate of cause of death’ (MCCD). However, data is not held by either the Scottish Government or the Scottish Prison Service on the number of instances of deaths in prison custody determined to be suicides involved non-prescription or illegal drugs found or suspected to be present in the deceased.
Steps are being taken through the implementation of the recommendations of the Independent Review of the Response to Deaths in Prison Custody to improve availability of data relating to deaths in prison custody.
- Asked by: Jamie Greene, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will outline the annual targets for increasing the number of body cameras available to Police Scotland officers, in light of the recent reported announcement that £20 million will be spent over the next five years on making almost 18,000 body cameras available.
Answer
The introduction of body-worn cameras is an operational decision for Police Scotland, acting under the oversight of the Scottish Police Authority (SPA).
As outlined in the answer to S6W-12605 on 12 December 2022, the SPA Resources Committee approved Police Scotland’s Initial Business Case for the Introduction of National Body Worn Video on 10 November 2022, ahead of consideration by the SPA Board. Police Scotland are expected to undertake a full procurement exercise in 2023 which will provide costs for 2023-24 and future years.
In 2023-24, the Scottish Government will invest £1.45 billion in policing. This includes a 6.3% increase to the Scottish Police Authority (SPA) resource budget.
All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 December 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 December 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether Marine Scotland will accept the findings of peer-reviewed scientific literature when the area of disturbance and injury to cetaceans from an Acoustic Deterrent Device (ADD) or Acoustic Startle Device (ASD) is estimated by the peer-reviewed scientific literature as being much greater than the area estimated in an application from a fish farm company for a European Protected Species Licence.
Answer
Marine Scotland bases its decisions on the best available scientific evidence at any particular time including any relevant peer reviewed literature. Any such literature is subject to a critical review to determine its applicability. Marine Scotland’s decisions will reflect the outcome of this process as well as consideration of information provided by the applicant and any expert advice received.