- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 23 July 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 16 August 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of each local authority's rapid rehousing transition plan, and whether it has concerns regarding any of them.
Answer
Rapid rehousing transition plans (RRTPs) are developed and owned by each local authority in Scotland, working with their partners. The Scottish Government asks each local authority to complete an activities and spend template each year, requesting information about the implementation of RRTPs. The areas covered in the template include the development of Housing First, prevention activity, the use of temporary accommodation, the availability of settled accommodation and yearly spend.
The Scottish Government carries out a review of these templates, including any additional information provided from updated RRTPs, and feedback is provided to each local authority. The Scottish Government is currently reviewing local authority submissions for 2020/21 and feedback to the local authorities will be issued during August 2021. A report on the implementation of RRTPs will be submitted to the Homelessness Prevention and Strategy Group (HPSG) later this year.
This process provides assurance to the Scottish Government about the development and implementation of RRTPs across Scotland and supports our continued partnership in tackling homelessness. While local authorities and their partners are best placed to develop and implement plans based on local circumstances, the areas covered in the activities and spend template allow the Scottish Government to review how plans support national homelessness policy objectives.
- Asked by: Craig Hoy, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 July 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 16 August 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether it plans to broaden the remit of the First-tier Tribunal for Scotland housing and property chamber to consider whether the fee charged by a property factor is (a) excessive, or (b) otherwise unjustified.
Answer
The Code of Conduct for Property Factors sets out minimum standards of practice and encourages transparency, while ensuring that homeowners know what to expect from their property factors. A revised Code of Conduct for Property Factors was approved by resolution of the Scottish Parliament in March 2021. This brought the Code of Conduct up to date, clarified and strengthened it, ensuring that all registered property factors operate consistently and to the appropriate standards, while also giving homeowners confidence in what their factor is offering them. The responses from homeowners to the public consultation for a revised Code of Conduct for Property Factors did not suggest that excessive or unjustified management fees was an area of concern. The consultation opened on 6 October 2017 and closed on 15 January 2018. You can find details of the consultation, an analysis of responses and view submitted responses at:
https://consult.gov.scot/housing-regeneration-and-welfare/code-of-conduct-for-registered-property-factors/
A property factor must provide each homeowner with a comprehensible written statement of services that sets out, in a simple, structured way, the terms and service delivery standards of the arrangement in place between them and the homeowner. This includes a requirement to set out the management fee charged by the property factor and the property factor’s policy for reviewing and increasing or decreasing this management fee. The revised Code will come into force on 16 August 2021.
While the Scottish Government has no plans to make changes that affect the remit of the First-tier Tribunal for Scotland (Housing and Property Chamber) at present, it is our intention to review the existing legislation to identify areas for consideration to strengthen and support the improved operation of the regulatory regime for property factors. We hope to undertake this work in the latter half of this operational year with the intention of including any proposed changes in a suitable legislative vehicle thereafter.
- Asked by: Craig Hoy, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 July 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 16 August 2021
To ask the Scottish Government how many property factors have been de-registered in each year since 2011, broken down by whether the factor was deregistered due to (a) no longer being considered to be a fit and proper person to be registered as a property factor, (b) having failed to comply with the obligation to include its registration number in correspondence sent to homeowners and (c) having failed to demonstrate compliance with (i) the property factor Code of Conduct and (ii) any property factor enforcement order made against the property factor by the First-tier Tribunal.
Answer
The information requested is contained in the following table:
Year (See Note 1) | Number removed from the register of property factors (See Note 2) | Removed under S4(7) as registration expired after 3 year period without an application for renewal | Removed under 8(1) (not fit and proper - failed to comply with the Code and / or a property factor enforcement order(s) (See Note 3) | Removed under 8(1) (dissolved / no longer a legal entity) |
2011 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
2012 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2013 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2014 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2015 | 20 | 19 | 1 | 0 |
2016 | 38 | 37 | 1 | 0 |
2017 | 19 | 15 | 0 | 4 |
2018 | 24 | 20 | 0 | 4 |
2019 | 44 | 42 | 1 | 1 |
2020 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
Note 1:
The register of property factors opened in October 2012 so no data is available for 2011.
Note 2:
The Property Factors (Scotland) Act 2011, allows that a property factor can be removed from the register for the following reasons:
- under section 4(7) (a) - where registrations are removed as no further application is received before expiry of the previous registration.
- under section 8(1) for no longer being a fit and proper person or failing to demonstrate compliance with:
o the property factor code of conduct, or
o any property factor enforcement order.
- under section 8(1) for no longer being a fit and proper person as they are no longer a legal entity (technical removal).
No Property Factor has been removed for failing to comply with their obligations around use of their property factor registered number.
Note 3:
Any non-voluntary removal of registration would be expected to be on the basis of a range of issues and not related to a single issue such as not complying with the requirements around the use of a property factor registered number.
- Asked by: Dean Lockhart, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 July 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 16 August 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what progress it has made in providing a policy framework to support local government in delivering the commitments that are set out in the Scotland Household Recycling Charter that has been agreed with COSLA.
Answer
Across Scotland in 2019 households once again recycled more than they sent to landfilI, and the whole-life carbon impact of Scotland’s household waste reached its lowest level since official recording began. There is however still work to be done to reduce waste further and increase recycling.
31 of 32 Scottish local authorities are now signed up to the Scottish Household Recycling Charter. Last year’s Programme for Government committed to evaluate the Charter with COSLA, and review its Code of Practice to ensure it reflects current best practice and makes it easier for households to recycle the right things.
This will ensure the Code of Practice will evolve in line with best practice and developments across the waste and recycling sector, including the introduction of our ambitious Deposit Return Scheme, and other Extended Producer Responsibility schemes.
Scottish Government are currently working with COSLA and SOLACE to complete the review of the Code Of Practice. A consultation on proposed changes is planned for the autumn.
To support local authorities to align recycling services with the charter, we have launched a new £70 million fund to improve recycling infrastructure, one of the largest single investments in recycling in Scotland. We have also committed to developing a new route map to achieve our ambitious 2025 waste and recycling targets.
- Asked by: Craig Hoy, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 July 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 16 August 2021
To ask the Scottish Government how many cases there have been of property factors operating without the appropriate (a) registration, and (b) approval through the property factor register, in each year since 2011.
Answer
It is not possible to know how many factors have been operating without registration each year.
Where the Scottish Ministers are made aware of a property factor operating without registration we will take action where there is evidence to support the allegation.
Operating as a factor without registration is a criminal offence and as such the investigation of such matters is for Police Scotland. Where concerns have been raised with the Scottish Government and we believe these require investigation by the Police, we will provide information of these concerns to the Police and cooperate with their investigations. We would encourage any property owner who considers that their factor is operating without registration to report the matter to Police Scotland.
- Asked by: Jamie Greene, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 July 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 16 August 2021
To ask the Scottish Government how many reports to the police have been recorded regarding scams and rogue traders targeting people in relation to the installation of new interlinked fire alarms, in light of its recent legislation requiring this.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not hold the requested information. The member may wish to redirect their question to Police Scotland who may have data on specific types of scams and rogue traders.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 21 July 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 16 August 2021
To ask the Scottish Government how much funding has been allocated to Keep Scotland Beautiful in each year since 2016.
Answer
Keep Scotland Beautiful has delivered a range of initiatives on the Scottish Government's behalf and has been allocated the following funding since 2016 to enable it to do so:
2016-17 £11,147,463
2017-18 £11,152,455
2018-19 £11,131,472
2019-20 £8,642,939
2020-21 £10,054,598
To date £1,555,145 has been awarded to KSB for initiatives to be delivered in this financial year
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 21 July 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 16 August 2021
To ask the Scottish Government from where, and by what mechanism, it will source the quantity of non-variable, firm, reliable electricity, that is currently generated by Hunterston power station, following its closure, which is due to take place within the next 12 months.
Answer
This is a reserved policy area. Responsibility for security of supply sits with National Grid ESO (the GB electricity system operator), which works closely with generators and network operators across Scotland to ensure that there is always enough electricity to meet demand.
This includes preparing for the closure of individual generators several years in advance, to ensure that closures do not impact electricity supplies. National Grid ESO has worked closely with EDF, owners of Hunterston and Torness, and with Scotland’s electricity network owners, to ensure that the network is able to respond to and support the closure of these nuclear power stations in the coming years.
National Grid ESO is currently overseeing a “Stability Pathfinder”, the second phase of which is looking at network and commercial options to replace the various network stability requirements currently provided by existing generation. This is designed to ensure that the networks are ready for the greater share that Scotland’s renewable resources will constitute in the future.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 21 July 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 16 August 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-01292 by Shona Robison on 19 July 2021, (a) how many and (b) what proportion of (i) homes and (ii) projects seeking grant funding in excess of the relevant benchmark have been subject to a more detailed value-for-money assessment in (A) total and (B) each of the last five years, also broken down by (I) local authority and (II) registered social landlord.
Answer
13,743 homes, which is 36% of homes assessed against benchmarks, have sought grant funding in excess of the relevant benchmark over the last five years. These homes were spread across 476 projects. All projects seeking grant funding in excess of the relevant grant subsidy benchmark will have been subject to more detailed value-for-money assessment. The tables showing the Affordable Housing Supply Programme Homes and Projects Approved Above Published Benchmarks have been placed in SPICe under BIB number 62586.
The tables contain data submitted by delivery partners through our digital programme management system called HARP (Housing and Regeneration Programme) and provide the breakdown as requested. The analysis is based on information provided at tender approval stage which is when projects are assessed against benchmark subsidy levels. Only projects which have a relevant benchmark have been included i.e. social rent homes provided by Registered Social Landlords (RSLs), social rented homes provided by Local Authorities, and affordable homes for Mid Market rent provided by RSLs and their subsidiaries.
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 21 July 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 16 August 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has made an assessment of the impact that nuclear energy generation has on (a) jobs, (b) skills and (c) the economy, and if it has not made such an assessment, whether it will do so.
Answer
We have not made an assessment of this kind. However, our work to refresh Scotland’s Energy Strategy, due to begin later this year, will include consideration of such aspects across the energy sector as a whole.