- Asked by: Sharon Dowey, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 October 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kaukab Stewart on 24 October 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether its membership of the Stonewall Diversity Champions scheme represents value for money for the taxpayer.
Answer
The Scottish Government has renewed its annual employer membership of the Stonewall’s Diversity Champion scheme for 2025. The Scottish Government keeps this under annual review, as with all its corporate memberships, to ensure they are providing value for money.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 October 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kate Forbes on 24 October 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how the Tay Cities Region Deal is supporting manufacturing firms.
Answer
We have committed £150 million towards the Tay Cities Region Deal, including £8 million towards the Advanced Manufacturing Programme.
The programme is being developed by Scottish Enterprise and will include support for manufacturing firms in the region. This reflects partners’ commitment to boost high-value manufacturing across the region, in line with their Regional Economic Prospectus.
- Asked by: Alexander Stewart, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 October 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 24 October 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-27536 by Tom Arthur on 28 May 2024, what information it has regarding how many landowners with a voluntary wayleave in place in Scotland in each of the last five years have issued the utility company with a notice to remove, also broken down by how many notices were complied with.
Answer
Details are as follows regarding how many notices to remove have been issued by landowners with a voluntary wayleave in place in the last five years:
Year | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
Notices to remove issued | 7 | 12 | 13 | 4 | 9 |
Regarding compliance with notices to remove, it is common for landowners to withdraw their notice to remove if a voluntary agreement is made between them and the license holder. If a voluntary agreement is not possible, the Scottish Government expects license holders to follow the necessary wayleave guidance to ensure access to that land for the purposes of inspecting, maintaining, repairing, adjusting, altering, replacing or removing the electric line or equipment: Electricity - necessary wayleaves: guidance for applicants, landowners and occupiers – 2022 update - gov.scot.
Details are as follows regarding necessary wayleave applications after a notice to remove has been issued:
Year | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
Necessary wayleaves granted | 3 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 October 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 24 October 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the potential (a) environmental and (b) economic impact on Scotland of any breakdown of the Gulf Stream and its associated currents, and what action it has carried out to prepare for any such eventuality.
Answer
The Scottish Government works to address a wide range of current and potential future impacts of climate change on Scotland. The actions and policies it is committed to delivering to build resilience and adapt to climate change are set out in the Scottish National Adaptation Plan (SNAP3). As established in the Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2008, this is a five-year cycle, with each new Adaptation Plan responding to the latest climate risk evidence base provided through technical advice and risk assessments published by the Climate Change Committee and UK Government. With regards to the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), the most recent Climate Change Risk Assessment (CCRA3) from the CCC does not factor AMOC into the underlying evidence base of climate risk and opportunities. The CCRA3 notes that a shutdown of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is considered very unlikely this century and is therefore not included in the specific evidence base on which SNAP3 has been designed to respond.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 October 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 24 October 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what advice and recommendations it has received, and from whom, regarding the proposed Nature Conservation Order to protect the Parallel Roads of Lochaber Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) at Achnabobane.
Answer
The Scottish Government has received advice and recommendations from NatureScot and Scottish Forestry with respect to the proposed Nature Conservation Order to protect the Parallel Roads of Lochaber Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) at Achnabobane. The NatureScot advice reflected local discussions between The Highland Council, Scottish Forestry and Police Scotland which sought to address damage to the SSSI.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 October 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 24 October 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how much has been committed to flood defence schemes in each year since 1999.
Answer
Since 2008, the Scottish Government has funded local authorities through the general capital grant to invest in flood protection and resilience measures. That funding is outlined in the following table.
The majority of funding available to councils is provided by means of a block grant from the Scottish Government. It is then the responsibility of individual local authorities to manage their own budgets and to allocate the total financial resources available to them, including on flooding protection, on the basis of local needs and priorities, having first fulfilled their statutory obligations and the jointly agreed set of national and local priorities.
Financial Year | Funding Amount (M) |
2007-08 | 42 |
2008-09 | 42 |
2009-10 | 42 |
2010-11 | 42 |
2011-12 | 42 |
2012-13 | 42 |
2013-14 | 42 |
2014-15 | 42 |
2015-16 | 42 |
2016-17 | 36 |
2017-18 | 47 |
2018-19 | 42 |
2019-20 | 42 |
2020-21 | 42 |
2021-22 | 52 |
2022-23 | 63 |
2023-24 | 61 |
2024-25 | 88* |
2025-26 | 121* |
*In 2024-25 and 2025-26 Scottish Government worked with COSLA to reprioritise some existing spend and emerging underspends, to allow that funding to be used to improve the pay offer for local government in 2024-25 and 2025-26. This included some funding initially allocated for flood protection that could not have been used by local authorities for flood protection in those years due to slippage and unforeseen complexities on several complex flood protection projects. The funding was and will be returned in full to local government for flood protection in the following financial year.
- Asked by: Edward Mountain, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 09 October 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 24 October 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the visit to Japan by the Cabinet Secretary for Climate Action and Energy in September 2025 to lead a delegation from Scotland's offshore wind sector, on what date the cabinet secretary agreed informally to go on the visit, and to whom this decision was given.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-40762 on 9 October 2025. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
- Asked by: Edward Mountain, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 09 October 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 24 October 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the visit to Japan by the Cabinet Secretary for Climate Action and Energy in September 2025 to lead a delegation from Scotland's offshore wind sector, on what date the visit was confirmed in the cabinet secretary’s diary.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-40762 on 9 October 2025. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 03 October 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ben Macpherson on 24 October 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the recent report by Audit Scotland, Scotland’s Colleges 2025, which recommends that the funding model for colleges should better reflect equity and demand for courses, whether it will review the funding model.
Answer
The Colleges Tripartite Alignment Group, comprised of Colleges Scotland, the Scottish Government and the Scottish Funding Council (SFC) has been exploring issues in the sector. Informed by the Group’s discussions, the SFC introduced changes to the college funding model for Academic Year 2025-26 in response to requests from the sector.
The SFC has committed to undertaking a fundamental review of the funding allocation model over the coming year.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 29 September 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 24 October 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to support ocean science and protect endangered species and fragile fisheries in the marine environment.
Answer
The Scottish Government continues to support a wide variety of marine science to ensure there is a strong evidence base to support marine management and the Blue Economy Vision. This includes the Scottish Government’s Science, Evidence, Data and Digital Portfolio, as well as directly commissioned science, and collaboration with a strong academic presence in Scotland through the Marine Alliance for Science and Technology Scotland (MASTS), other UK administrations and international partners. This is reflected in the Scottish Government’s Marine Science and Innovation Strategy, which was published in 2024, and the appointment of an independent Chief Scientific Advisor Marine. Furthermore, in 2025 following consultation with Scotland’s academic marine science community, the Marine and Freshwater Areas of Research Interest was published.
This evidence base has been critical in delivering a range of programmes that can also protect Scotland’s iconic marine species. This includes the publication of the Scottish Seabird Conservation Action Plan, which identifies over 50 priority actions aimed at improving the conservation status of Scotland’s seabirds; and the development of a UK Cetacean Conservation Strategy to address threats to cetaceans in UK waters. Furthermore, work on the Future Catching Policy, Bycatch Mitigation Initiative, marine litter and Marine Protected Areas have all been shaped by a robust evidence base and help to protect internationally important sensitive species including cetaceans, seals, seabirds, and elasmobranchs.
With regard to fisheries, we take an evidence-based approach to its management, with a range of policies and actions focussed on managing marine fish stocks sustainably, and in a way that is supportive of the achievement of the fisheries objectives set out in the Fisheries Act 2020, the Joint Fisheries Statement and other legislative commitments. Alongside delivery partners, Scottish Government is also progressing actions under Scotland’s Wild Salmon Strategy Implementation Plan to ensure the protection and recovery of wild Atlantic salmon populations in Scotland. This work is underpinned by advice from the Wild Salmon Strategy Science and Evidence Board.