- Asked by: Foysol Choudhury, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 22 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what proportion of women in Scotland who had an Essure contraceptive implant have had to subsequently undergo (a) a hysterectomy and (b) any other surgery as a result of the implant.
Answer
The information requested is not held by the Scottish Government. This would be a matter for individual Health Boards.
- Asked by: Foysol Choudhury, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 22 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what support is in place to improve the health of any women who may have experienced reported side effects such as chronic pain, nickel poisoning, perforated organs and autoimmune reactions as a result of having an Essure contraceptive implant.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-06890 on 9 March 2022.
It is important that anyone who experiences complications receives appropriate and timely care, and so I would encourage any woman with concerns to speak to her GP in the first instance. We are clear that GPs must take any patient’s concerns seriously, and must ensure that they have all the advice they to make an informed decision on their care.
All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 22 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on (a) how many reverse vending machines (RVMs) it estimates will be used in its Deposit Return Scheme, (b) the most recent evidence it has regarding the costs of each machine, (c) which companies in Scotland can supply these machines, and how many, (d) any engagement that it has had with any such companies, (e) which companies outside of Scotland supply RVMs, and any engagement that it has had with them and (f) how it will avoid a potential monopoly situation arising in respect of the supply of RVMs that are compatible with its updated requirements for their use and operation.
Answer
The number of Reverse Vending Machines (RVMs) that will be used in Scotland’s Deposit Return Scheme (DRS), was estimated at 3,021. This information can be found in Table 2 on page 19 of the revised Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment (BRIA).
The BRIA also indicates that the cost of an RVM could vary from around £19,000 to £25,000 for smaller models, and around £30,000 for a larger machine.
The costs associated with operating of Return Points, including RVMs can be found in Table 1 on page 5 of the Full Business Case Addendum .
The identification and acquisition of DRS-compatible RVMs is a matter for the Scheme Administrator, Circularity Scotland Ltd, and retailers to manage. This is consistent with the industry-led approach to DRS.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 22 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the comment by the Minister for Green Skills, Circular Economy and Biodiversity at the meeting of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee on 25 January 2022 that the annual cost of operating Circularity Scotland “in a steady state” is estimated in the full business case to be £92.9 million, whether it will publish full details of that total; what its position is on whether this is an accurate estimate, and, if it does not consider it to be accurate, what its estimate is, and how many employees it anticipates will be employed through these annual costs.
Answer
Information relating to the ‘steady state’ costs can be found in Section 3.3 of the Full Business Case Addendum which was published on 16 March 2020 and can be downloaded here: https://www.gov.scot/publications/deposit-return-scheme-scotland-full-business-case-addendum/documents/ .
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 22 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to the Deposit Return Scheme and the estimates it made of the costs of loss of revenue to retailers caused by the loss of space necessary to accommodate a reverse vending machine (RVM), whether it will state (a) what specific evidence it obtained from Envipco whom it cites as the basis for the figure used of around 0.5 square metres, (b) what discussions it had with representatives of small retailers in connection with the business and regulatory impact assessment (BRIA) of 2019 (paragraph 174) and the Final BRIA of 2021 (paragraph 209), (c) what its response is to reports that many small retailers believe that the space required for the smallest RVM that would permit its location in a shop and its use for its intended purpose, including extraction of recyclate, is 3 square metres of floor space, which is around six times more than what was estimated and (d) what it estimates will be the total annual cost of loss of revenue for retailers that is attributable to the loss of floor space required for RVMs based on the area of (i) 0.5 and (ii) 3 square metres.
Answer
The most up to date information available regarding the impact of Scotland’s Deposit Return Scheme on retailers, including information about the use of Reverse Vending Machines (RVMs) can be found in the amended Final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment (BRIA), which was published on 22 December 2021 and can be downloaded from the Scottish Government’s website here: https://www.gov.scot/publications/deposit-return-scheme-scotland-final-business-regulatory-impact-assessment/ .
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 22 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government which items of glass recyclate that are currently capable of being disposed of in existing local authority schemes will not be capable of being recycled in its Deposit Return Scheme; what arrangements will be in place to continue the recycling of such items, and what proportion of the total of glass recyclate these items will constitute, expressed as a proportion of the (a) number and (b) volume of items.
Answer
There is a duty in the Waste (Scotland) Regulations 2012 for local authorities to provide a collection for glass. The Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) is for single-use drinks containers; local authorities will continue to collect all other glass not captured by DRS.
The Scottish Government does not hold figures relating to the proportion of glass recyclate for non-scheme articles. However, including glass in DRS will bring significant environmental and economic benefits. The inclusion of glass will save over 1.2 megatonnes CO2 equivalent over 25 years and will also reduce the amount of harmful glass litter in our environment. In addition, DRS will significantly increase the quantity and quality of glass recyclate, creating an aggregated and high-quality feedstock for reprocessing. This will include clear glass, which we understand to be in high demand.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 22 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the comment by the Minister for Green Skills, Circular Economy and Biodiversity at the meeting of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee on 25 January 2022 that "Circularity Scotland intends the reverse vending machines [RVMs] that it advises businesses to install to be compatible with future digital schemes", which includes a digital deposit return scheme, whether this requirement will be mandatory on the part of businesses; what extra costs that will entail to each business in relation to the most recent estimated cost of a minimum of £19,000 per machine; what steps it took to ascertain the cost impacts of requiring businesses to purchase or lease RVMs that are compatible in this way; what checking it undertook regarding whether it is possible to obtain RVMs that are compatible, and what choice there is of RVMs that have this compatibility that will ensure that competition applies in the RMV market.
Answer
Return Point operators are responsible for ensuring that the Reverse Vending Machines (RVM) that they use meet the specifications supplied by the Scheme Administrator, Circularity Scotland Ltd (CSL).
The costs of operating a Return Point, including the RVM, is offset by the Retail Handling Fee paid by CSL to Return Point operators per in-scope container they process.
- Asked by: Maggie Chapman, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ben Macpherson on 22 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what evaluation it has made of the impact on the Scottish labour market of the UK Government’s proposed reduction in the time offered to unemployed social security recipients to seek work in their preferred job sector from three months to four weeks.
Answer
The Scottish Government routinely publishes a range of labour market statistics and analysis to monitor changes in our labour market. These can be accessed at the following link: Labour market statistics - gov.scot (www.gov.scot) .
No evaluation of the UK Government’s proposed reduction in the time offered to unemployed social security recipients to seek work has been carried out by the Scottish Government. However, this recent announcement from the UK Government is yet another example of a system which doesn’t work well enough to help our most vulnerable people, in a time when support is most needed. Universal Credit, which is the responsibility of the UK Government, is too often failing the people it is designed to support and driving more people into poverty.
- Asked by: Maggie Chapman, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ben Macpherson on 22 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what contact during this parliamentary session it has had with the Department for Work and Pensions regarding the impact of social security sanctions in Scotland.
Answer
Since the start of this parliamentary session the Scottish Government has written to the UK Government on three separate occasions regarding a number of different issues with the Universal Credit system. The Scottish Government is very concerned that since the DWP reintroduced conditionality, including sanctions, the number of hardship payments have increased substantially. The Scottish Government will continue to call on the UK Government to make Universal Credit a system that works for people and not against them.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 March 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 22 March 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what consideration it has given to the Valpak report, Deposit Return Schemes for Drinks Containers, and its findings that a majority of people prefer a kerbside collection scheme to be used for recycling.
Answer
Public support for Scotland’s Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) is high.
Zero Waste Scotland’s consumer research indicates that 71% of the public support the introduction of DRS.
Kerbside collection remains important since it enables people to recycle non-scheme items. Additionally, DRS will help local authority waste management services to free up capacity to support wider collection services and improve recycling rates on other materials.
Furthermore, DRS will significantly increase the quantity and quality of glass recyclate, creating an aggregated and high-quality feedstock for reprocessing.
We do not believe an enhanced kerbside scheme could deliver the level or rate of improvement that we will see through DRS. Packaging recycling rates have stalled, including for glass, and the current producer responsibility system is not driving improvement.
DRS should deliver an 85% collection rate for glass by the second full year of operation at the latest.