- Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 11 August 2022
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 19 August 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the announcement by the UK Government on 19 July 2022 that it will issue around 50% of overall Basic Payment Scheme payments to farmers from July 2022, with the remaining 50% expected in December 2022, whether it will bring forward the initial payment date to August 2022, and if this is not the case, what the reasons are for its position on the matter.
Answer
The Scottish Government has already been taking action to improve business cash flow and annual farm payment dates are to be brought forward to September. Subject to the approval of the Scottish Parliament, farmers and crofters will receive their advance payment for the Basic Payment Scheme (BPS) and Greening around a month earlier than originally planned, and we remain committed to delivering over 70% of payments by the end of December and over 95.24% of payments by the end of February 2023.
- Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 22 July 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 19 August 2022
To ask the Scottish Government how many organisations (a) applied for and (b) received funding from its Black History Month fund, and what was the total amount of funding allocated.
Answer
In October 2021 the Scottish Government piloted a fund of up to £10,000 for organisations across Scotland to support additional activity to tackle inequalities and prejudice in line with the goals and outcomes of Black History Month. Organisations could apply for small grants in an open competition.
The Scottish Government received six applications to this fund, and following assessment of the bids against the aims and criteria for the fund, made two grants totalling £2,000 to Scoutable United and Economic Lead for projects to provide and promote opportunities for people from minority ethnic communities to participate in sport, and for women to participate in decision-making at Board level, increasing diversity in decision-making.
The rest of the funding was subsequently allocated to other organisations and projects working to tackle discrimination and advance race equality, such as supporting staff training and development (Intercultural Youth Scotland), and work with young people in the Gypsy/Traveller community to develop skills for life, training and work (Article 12).
- Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 22 July 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 19 August 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, regarding its Black History Month fund, whether it can provide (a) the names of organisations that received funding and (b) a breakdown of what each organisation spent its money on.
Answer
Two applications met the aims and criteria of the fund.
Scoutable United received £1,000 to provide and promote equal opportunities for people from minority ethnic communities to participate in football. The funding was utilised to secure training facilities and organise games, and to invest in equipment such as training bibs, cones and footballs. This aimed to increase the number of people participating in the sport and to provide a platform to demonstrate talent, increasing representation and encouraging active lifestyles.
Economic Lead received £1,000 to organise workshops for minority ethnic women to increase their ability and confidence to participate on Boards and in strategic groups, and to establish a peer support network. This aimed to support an increase in representation by minority ethnic women and boost diversity in decision-making within the public and third sectors.
- Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 22 July 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 19 August 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether it plans to reopen its Black History Month fund for 2022.
Answer
We are currently reviewing all of our budgets for promoting Equality, Inclusion and Human Rights, in the light of the constraints imposed by the Resource Spending Review. We have no current plans to provide a Black History Month Fund for 2022, but across Equality, Inclusion and Human Rights we have a budget allocation of £46.9m. A significant portion of this will be dedicated to promoting race equality through a range of means, including supporting the capacity of race equality organisations, which are well placed to mark and celebrate BHM in a range of ways.
- Asked by: Pauline McNeill, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 02 August 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 19 August 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what meetings (a) it has had recently (b) are planned with COSLA to explore all options available regarding the funding by local authorities of any pay increases.
Answer
A series of meetings to explore the issues and options available were held between officials on 30 June, 13 July and 1 August.
Following these meetings, the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice, Housing and Local Government and myself met with a delegation of COSLA’s political leadership on 3 August and held a further meeting with their Resources Spokesperson on 8 August.
Those discussions resulted in the Scottish Government committing an extra £140m on a recurring basis to support councils and COSLA with the local government pay negotiations.
We again met with representatives of COSLA’s political leadership on 17 August.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 02 August 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 19 August 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether Ukrainian refugees will have access to free NHS dental treatment.
Answer
All Ukrainian refugees living in Scotland are entitled to access free NHS dental care. The Scottish Government has issued guidance to Health Boards explaining this policy, a copy of which can be found at: https://www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/publications/nhs-scotland-services-ukraine.pdf .
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 27 July 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 19 August 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether it supports in principle a United States' nuclear energy company’s reported declared interest in establishing a design office for small modular reactors in the Highlands, and, if so, whether it will notify this to Highlands and Islands Enterprise.
Answer
Yes. Scottish Government officials are engaged with partners in Highlands and Islands Enterprise to discuss this opportunity.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 July 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by George Adam on 19 August 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-09614 by George Adam on 19 July 2022, how many times in each of the last five years it has exceeded the time limit for responding to (a) freedom of information requests and (b) letters to ministers.
Answer
The Scottish Government remains committed to answering all correspondence as quickly as possible and within agreed timescales.
In relation to (a) freedom of information requests, the figures for the last five financial years are as follows:
Year | Number of FOI requests responded to on time | Number of FOI responses issued late |
April 2017 - March 2018 | 2113 | 431 |
April 2018 - March 2019 | 2671 | 311 |
April 2019 - March 2020 | 2662 | 156 |
April 2020 - March 2021 | 2561 | 649 |
April 2021 - March 2022 | 3291 | 608 |
In relation to (b) Ministerial correspondence the figures for the last five financial years are as follows:
Year | Correspondence responded to on time | Correspondence responded to after the 20 day correspondence target |
April 2017 - March 2018 | 31941 | 3835 |
April 2018 – March 2019 | 27448 | 5219 |
April 2019 – March 2020 | 23488 | 4211 |
April 2020 - March 2021 | 62323 | 44921 |
April 2021 - March 2022 | 55600 | 15922 |
It should be noted that the Scottish Government changed correspondence management system through the period 2018 to the end of 2020. The phased transition between systems means that the response data from 2017-2020 and from 2020–2022, cannot be easily compared. The different methods each system uses to store and count correspondence means that the response rate numbers, displayed above, are not like for like comparable across the 5-year period.
At the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, correspondence received by the Scottish Government more than trebled, compared to the previous year. As the Government focused on the emergency response to the pandemic, performance against the pre-pandemic response target fell. However the response rate improved in the subsequent year. The Scottish Government is committed to building on this improvement and monitors correspondence response rate on a regular basis. Processes and systems are regularly reviewed to ensure that they are conducive to delivering high-quality correspondence as quickly as possible.
- Asked by: Willie Rennie, MSP for North East Fife, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 29 July 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 19 August 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answers to questions S6W-06253 and S6W-05317 by Ivan McKee on 10 February and 27 January 2022 respectively, whether it will provide the information requested regarding what the precise technical purpose was of it owning the Dalzell steelworks for a short period; what specific benefits this provided to (a) Tata Steel UK, (b) Liberty House and (c) the Scottish Government, and what prevented a direct sale of the asset without the Scottish Government owning the steelworks for a short period.
Answer
The Scottish Government’s intervention in March 2016 was designed to ensure that steel communities in Scotland had a future. The benefits of the intervention are manifest in the high-quality steel products that continue to be produced in Lanarkshire, the skilled employment retained and the economic multiplier effects that accrue via ongoing payments to suppliers and the circulation of income through the local economy. Tata Steel, Liberty House and the Scottish Government were all aligned in agreeing a transaction that secured the earliest realisation of the commercial and wider economic benefits of the deal, and the selected structure was the best available means to deliver this.
- Asked by: Willie Rennie, MSP for North East Fife, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 29 July 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 19 August 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-06253 by Ivan McKee on 10 February 2022, what each party required from the sale and purchase of the business that could not be achieved without the Scottish Government owning the steelworks for a short period of time.
Answer
The three parties to the sale and purchase of the Lanarkshire steelworks on 2016 – Tata Steel, Liberty House and the Scottish Government – were all aligned in agreeing a transaction that secured the earliest realisation of the commercial and wider economic benefits of the deal, and the selected structure was the best available means to deliver this. Following negotiation the particular commercial requirements of each party are captured in the transaction documentation.