Seòmar agus comataidhean

This is an operational matter for ScotRail, noting that in 2016 any agreement was with the private company, Abellio ScotRail, but ScotRail is now operated by a new, publicly owned company.

The additional £8.55 billion of UK Government funding for CRSTS2 relates to financial years 2027-28 to 2031-32.

This funding will form part of the Department for Transport’s (DfT) future budget allocation. The Scottish Government will receive additional Barnett funding as part of its block grant based on any increase in the DfT’s total budget for the relevant financial years in accordance with the Statement of Funding Policy.

This funding announcement falls into the next UK Government Spending Review period and confirmation of funding levels for the Scottish Government will only be confirmed once the Spending Review has concluded.

This is an operational matter for ScotRail.

Funding for the HS2 programme has been provided by the UK Government to the Department for Transport (DfT) who manage the project, at UK Spending Reviews.

The Scottish Government receives Barnett funding based on the movements in DfT’s total budget.

As the UK Government have indicated that all funding for HS2 will be retained by the DfT for other projects, there should be no loss of Barnett funding.

However, this funding falls partly into the next UK Government Spending Review period and confirmation of funding levels will only be confirmed once the Spending Review has concluded.

The information requested is not held centrally by the Scottish Government. The member may wish to contact the British Transport Police.

Scotland’s secure accommodation centres offer an integrated model of delivery, caring for children together in locked premises under high intensity supervision. This applies regardless of the route children have been placed there.

When a child is placed in secure care, children’s safety is to the fore. Secure care centres are highly skilled and experienced in directing and restricting the contacts that a young person can have with others.

The daily care arrangements experienced by individual children are tailored to their own risk and needs, and the safety requirements of other children. This involves risk-assessing the individual child, and then formulating a plan, based on those risks and the vulnerabilities of any others with whom they may come into contact.

The following table gives the number of homelessness applications live as at 25 December 2022, by local authority and the associated number of (a) adults and (b) children.

This is an operational matter for ScotRail, though we can advise that the Scottish Government does not support Driver Only Operation and continues to specify a requirement for a second member of staff to assist passengers on every ScotRail train.

Young people who have been supported and supervised under the children’s hearings system are not dealt with as ‘offenders’, as would be the case in the criminal justice system. There is no retributive focus for decision-makers in the children’s hearings system. Once a compulsory supervision order (CSO) has ended or been discharged, then the implementation authority has duties regarding the necessary aftercare arrangements. Section 7 of the Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Bill would, if passed, amend the Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 to enable a children’s hearing on reviewing a CSO, to consider whether after the CSO is to come to an end, the child might still need supervision or guidance after the child turns 18. In that case, the relevant local authority's duty to provide the child with that supervision or guidance continues to have effect after the child turns 18 until they turn 19. 60% of over 100 respondents to the Bill consultation in 2022 supported this. By this point, there would be no compulsion or obligation to accept offers of support. Rather, the young person may benefit from, and wish, voluntary advice, guidance and assistance as they transition to adulthood.

Assessments are made at local level of the potential impacts of non-native species on adjacent or nearby habitats, through implementation of the Forestry Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations (EIA), and the implementation of the UK Forestry Standard (UKFS) and associated guidance.

The EIA Regulations process ensures assessment of the potential environmental and social impact of non-native tree species seeding into other habitats. Where the new woodland proposed is adjacent to European designated site, a Habitats Regulations Appraisal (HRA) is also required to assess potential impacts. The UKFS and associated guidance also requires appraisals to be made of the potential impact of productive woodland on neighbouring habitats, as part of both woodland creation applications and Long-Term Forest Plans.