- Asked by: Willie Rennie, MSP for North East Fife, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 09 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 17 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government how many applications were received in the process of appointing a new chair of the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission, and where, in addition to the Scottish Government website, the position was advertised.
Answer
A total of 13 applications were received for the post of Chair to the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission. The appointment process for that post remains on-going. At the same time, the SCCRC advertised a vacancy for a Legal Member, which also attracted 13 applications.
The Scottish Government posted the adverts on the Scottish Government hosted public appointments webpages.
The adverts were circulated to over 1500 individuals and groups who have registered on the public appointments notes of interest contact list. This information is circulated to bodies such as Citizens Advice Scotland, the Equality Network, Women on Boards, and Changing the Chemistry.
Scottish Government officials also reached out to a number of other relevant organisations to draw their attention to the vacancies. These were:
- The Faculty of Advocates;
- Scottish Legal Aid Board;
- The Society of Solicitor Advocates;
- Scottish Legal Complaints;
- The Equalities and Human Rights Commission;
- The Scottish Human Rights Commission;
- The Legal Services Agency;
- Law Centres Network;
- Fair Justice System for Scotland Group;
- Govan Law Centre; and
- The Scottish Ethnic Minorities Lawyers Association.
The vacancies were also posted on the Scottish Legal News website, the Scottish Legal News X page, and advertised via Scottish Legal News’ daily newsletter.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 09 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 17 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government which flood defence projects may be reduced or stopped, in light of its fiscal statement on 3 September 2024.
Answer
Within an extremely challenging financial context, the Scottish Government has made difficult funding decisions. Local authorities have received all the funding they have requested for flood protection in 2024-25 and, as such, £26 million from the Flood Risk Management Programme is being repurposed this financial year to support local government pay and avoid impactful industrial action. Decisions on the status of future projects will therefore be made by individual local authorities. We have sought assurances from local authorities through COSLA that redirection of this portion of the funding will not impact on councils progressing with their flood protection schemes as planned.
- Asked by: Collette Stevenson, MSP for East Kilbride, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 17 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-28112 by Shona Robison on 20 June 2024, whether it will provide (a) an update on the final audited reserves held by each local authority at 31 March 2024 and (b) the percentage increase in reserves for each local authority since 31 March 2014.
Answer
Final audited reserves data for 31 March 2024 is not currently held by the Scottish Government.
As far as possible, where audited reserves figures are available for 31 March 2024, these will be published in February 2025 as part of Scottish Local Government Finance Statistics 2023-24.
The following table shows the cash and real terms value of Local Authority General Fund reserves at 31 March 2014 (final audited) and 31 March 2024 (now updated with provisional outturn data from POBE 2024 dataset). Please note that the information requested on reserves is not held prior to 2007.
Due to small numbers in many of the VJBs and transport authorities, real-term percentage changes in reserves have only been calculated for Councils and Strathclyde Passenger Transport.
Adjustments for inflation have been made using the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) deflators for March 2024 (available at: GDP deflators at market prices, and money GDP - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)).
Further information on Local Government Finance Statistics can be found at: Local government finance statistics - gov.scot (www.gov.scot).
General Fund Reserves (in £ millions) as at 31 March | | | | | | | |
Sources: LFR 23 for 31 March 2014 (audited data), POBE 2024 for 31 March 2024 which is provisional outturn data provided in early 2024. | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Cash Terms | | Real Terms (2023-24 Prices) | | Percentage Increase |
Local Authority | 31-Mar-14 | 31-Mar-24 | | 31-Mar-14 | 31-Mar-24 | | Real Terms |
| Final Audited | Provisional Outturn | | Final Audited | Provisional Outturn | | |
Aberdeen City | 57.1 | 85.9 | | 75.2 | 85.9 | | 14% |
Aberdeenshire | 57.5 | 65.4 | | 75.7 | 65.4 | | -14% |
Angus | 19.8 | 71.2 | | 26.1 | 71.2 | | 173% |
Argyll & Bute | 44.0 | 86.4 | | 58.0 | 86.4 | | 49% |
City of Edinburgh | 123.3 | 265.9 | | 162.3 | 265.9 | | 64% |
Clackmannanshire | 12.0 | 21.0 | | 15.8 | 21.0 | | 32% |
Dumfries & Galloway | 58.4 | 86.4 | | 76.9 | 86.4 | | 12% |
Dundee City | 8.1 | 56.6 | | 10.6 | 56.6 | | 433% |
East Ayrshire | 28.0 | 49.1 | | 36.9 | 49.1 | | 33% |
East Dunbartonshire | 11.3 | 47.7 | | 14.9 | 47.7 | | 220% |
East Lothian | 9.2 | 26.4 | | 12.1 | 26.4 | | 118% |
East Renfrewshire | 14.9 | 52.1 | | 19.6 | 52.1 | | 165% |
Falkirk | 25.8 | 49.7 | | 33.9 | 49.7 | | 47% |
Fife | 85.0 | 216.1 | | 111.9 | 216.1 | | 93% |
Glasgow City | 32.8 | 277.4 | | 43.2 | 277.4 | | 543% |
Highland | 40.3 | 131.8 | | 53.1 | 131.8 | | 148% |
Inverclyde | 42.9 | 27.4 | | 56.5 | 27.4 | | -51% |
Midlothian | 20.5 | 35.0 | | 27.0 | 35.0 | | 29% |
Moray | 21.4 | 45.7 | | 28.1 | 45.7 | | 62% |
Na h-Eileanan Siar | 18.3 | 30.0 | | 24.1 | 30.0 | | 24% |
North Ayrshire | 25.2 | 110.1 | | 33.1 | 110.1 | | 233% |
North Lanarkshire | 75.0 | 249.9 | | 98.8 | 249.9 | | 153% |
Orkney Islands | 23.8 | 28.5 | | 31.3 | 28.5 | | -9% |
Perth & Kinross | 48.2 | 69.7 | | 63.5 | 69.7 | | 10% |
Renfrewshire | 52.9 | 127.4 | | 69.7 | 127.4 | | 83% |
Scottish Borders | 17.1 | 49.6 | | 22.6 | 49.6 | | 120% |
Shetland Islands | 13.9 | 72.0 | | 18.2 | 72.0 | | 295% |
South Ayrshire | 22.9 | 47.7 | | 30.2 | 47.7 | | 58% |
South Lanarkshire | 13.4 | 150.3 | | 17.6 | 150.3 | | 753% |
Stirling | 13.3 | 29.9 | | 17.5 | 29.9 | | 71% |
West Dunbartonshire | 10.1 | 29.1 | | 13.3 | 29.1 | | 118% |
West Lothian | 22.6 | 57.1 | | 29.7 | 57.1 | | 92% |
Ayrshire VJB | 0.2 | 0.7 | | 0.3 | 0.7 | | |
Central VJB | 0.8 | 0.4 | | 1.0 | 0.4 | | |
Dunbartonshire& Argyll & Bute VJB | 0.5 | 0.8 | | 0.6 | 0.8 | | |
Grampian VJB | 0.2 | 0.7 | | 0.3 | 0.7 | | |
Highland & Western Isles VJB | 0.1 | 0.2 | | 0.2 | 0.2 | | |
Lanarkshire VJB | - | 1.7 | | - | 1.7 | | |
Lothian VJB | - | 1.3 | | - | 1.3 | | |
Orkney & Shetland VJB | - | 0.0 | | - | 0.0 | | |
Renfrewshire VJB | 0.5 | 0.8 | | 0.6 | 0.8 | | |
Tayside VJB | 0.1 | 0.1 | | 0.1 | 0.1 | | |
Tay Road Bridge | 1.2 | 1.2 | | 1.5 | 1.2 | | |
HITRANS | 0.2 | 0.1 | | 0.3 | 0.1 | | |
NESTRANS | 0.0 | 3.6 | | 0.0 | 3.6 | | |
SESTRAN | - | 0.2 | | - | 0.2 | | |
SPT | 12.5 | 109.7 | | 16.5 | 109.7 | | 565% |
SWESTRANS | - | 0.0 | | - | 0.0 | | |
TACTRAN | - | 0.1 | | - | 0.1 | | |
ZetTrans | - | 0.0 | | - | 0.0 | | |
Scotland | 1,085.4 | 2870.0 | | 1,428.8 | 2,870.0 | | 101% |
| | | | | | | |
VJB = Valuation Joint Board | | | | | | | |
GDP Deflator | 75.97 | 100.00 | | | | | |
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 17 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-29077 by Gillian Martin on 2 September 2024, whether, in principle, it is opposed to deep sea mining, and whether it will prohibit deep sea mining in a similar way to unconventional oil and gas extraction.
Answer
Deep sea mining refers to the exploration for - or extraction of - minerals from the seabed at depths greater than 200 metres. Most of Scotland’s waters of this depth or greater fall within existing Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). Current Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) conservation and management advice for the West of Scotland MPA, which covers the majority of Scotland’s deep waters and seamounts, advises against seabed mining in such waters.
In 2019 the Scottish Government finalised its policy position of ‘no support’ for Unconventional oil and gas development: our position - gov.scot (www.gov.scot) unconventional oil and gas (UOG) development in Scotland. This policy position relates to onshore unconventional oil and gas development. This means development connected to the onshore exploration, appraisal or production of coal bed methane or shale oil or shale gas using unconventional oil and gas extraction techniques, including hydraulic fracturing and dewatering for coal bed methane.
As yet, the Scottish Ministers have not received any marine licence applications for deep sea mining in Scotland’s inshore or offshore waters. All marine licence applications are considered on a case-by-case basis. Any licensing application relating to seabed mining within Scotland’s seas would be subject to the licensing requirements set out in the Marine (Scotland) Act 2010 for inshore waters (between 0 and 12 nautical miles), and the UK Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 for offshore waters (beyond 12 nm). Statutory environmental assessment requirements and policies set out in Scotland’s existing National Marine Plan would have to be factored into any potential licensing request and considered on the best available evidence.
Scotland’s National Marine Plan 2015 states that decision makers should ensure all the necessary environmental issues are considered, and safeguards are in place when determining whether any proposed marine aggregate dredging is considered to be environmentally acceptable. Any licensing request relating to seabed mining in Scotland’s seas would be subject to this policy.
- Asked by: Foysol Choudhury, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 17 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on the negotiations between Transport Scotland and Ambassador Living in relation to concluding the Ferrymuir Gait access issue.
Answer
Transport Scotland is still engaged in positive dialogue with the housing developer to agree a way forward for access through Ferrymuir Gait. We are now at a position whereby the agreements are being signed by both parties, therefore it is hoped that this will be concluded as soon as reasonably practicable.
- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 17 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will set out its working definition of austerity.
Answer
Austerity measures are those which take forward a definite policy of reducing public spending on programmes and activity irrespective of the impact on the outcomes of those programmes and activity.
For example, the Labour UK Government’s severe restriction on the Winter Fuel Payment, and its consequent impact of reducing the budget for these programmes in Scotland by up to £160m, is a clear implementation of Westminster austerity.
This has followed Scotland long being subject to the austerity policies of the Conservative UK Government. In the face of this, the Scottish Government has stepped in to support people and services where it has been needed most – on social security, health, public sector pay, and public services – and has used all levers at its disposal to do so and mitigate the impact of Westminster austerity in Scotland. This includes an around £1.5 billion in 2024-25 from Scotland’s progressive Income Tax policy.
The new Labour UK Government’s commitment to the same debt rule as the previous government was always going to entail a similar fiscal constraint, and the UK Government is now pursuing policies that appear to be a continuation of Conservative austerity. Further spending cuts and austerity by the new UK Government will impact on the funding available for the budget here in Scotland.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 17 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will ensure that the forthcoming commercial tender to procure a new fleet of Intercity trains will include a clause to allow the option to order additional trains in the future, which would allow ScotRail to increase its fleet size as passenger demand requires or to support potential future uplifts in service levels without any additional costs that could be associated with completing a further procurement process.
Answer
A full ScotRail fleet strategy is being developed and refined, taking into account the fiscal constraints as well as other relevant government policies.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 17 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government to what extent it has engaged with key stakeholders, such as rail workers and passengers, in relation to the development of the forthcoming commercial tender to procure a new fleet of Intercity trains to ensure that (a) the specification for this new fleet is reflective of the needs and wants of staff and service users and (b) they provide a comfortable environment with, for example, an increase in the number of table seats rather than airline-style seats and ensuring that seats align with windows, which is reportedly a proven driver in making rail travel an attractive alternative to car travel.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-29572 on 17 September 2024. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
ScotRail will engage with various stakeholders during the process in order best to meet passenger needs.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 17 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will ensure that (a) the forthcoming commercial tender to procure a new fleet of Intercity trains will build upon any benefits already delivered by the existing High Speed Train fleet and (b) this new fleet will provide (i) an uplift in capacity and (ii) adequate facilities to support an increase in leisure and tourist travel, such as family-friendly facilities, ample bicycle and luggage storage, and improved catering provisions, which have reportedly played a key role in supporting ScotRail’s post-COVID-19 pandemic recovery.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-29572 on 17 September 2024. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
- Asked by: Tess White, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 September 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 17 September 2024
To ask the Scottish Government how funding to local authorities for flood defences will change as a result of the in-year spending reductions outlined in its fiscal statement on 3 September 2024.
Answer
Within an extremely challenging financial context, the Scottish Government has made difficult funding decisions. Local authorities have received all the funding they have requested for flood protection in 2024-25 and, as such, £26 million from the Flood Risk Management Programme is being repurposed this financial year to support local government pay and avoid impactful industrial action. We have sought assurances from local authorities through COSLA that redirection of this portion of the funding will not impact on councils progressing with their flood protection schemes as planned.