- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 22 August 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 8 September 2025
To ask the Scottish Government in what ways it is supporting Argyll and Bute Council in relation to the reported closure of the B8035 at Gribun Rocks as a result of rock falls.
Answer
Transport Scotland has had no requests for support from Argyll and Bute Council regarding the closure of the B8035. Transport Scotland has responsibility for the trunk road network, and as such has no responsibility for the maintenance or repair of any local road.
Local authorities have a duty under the Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 to manage and maintain local roads in their area and duties under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 to secure the expeditious, convenient and safe movement of traffic.
Ultimately, it is for locally elected representatives to make local decisions on how best to deliver services to their local communities.
- Asked by: Michael Marra, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 22 August 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 8 September 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what active travel plans for the Western Gateway area of Dundee have been submitted to it by Dundee City Council, and when any decisions will be made on allocating funding.
Answer
Dundee City Council have submitted an application to Tier 2 of the Active Travel Infrastructure Fund for design funding to develop active travel options for the Western Gateway development area. These include a segregated cycle route, speed limit reduction measures, pedestrian and cycle crossings, modal filters, a cycle-friendly road project, and shared use paths.
Successful Active Travel Infrastructure Fund applications for 2025-26 for design are yet to be awarded.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Friday, 22 August 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 8 September 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has considered providing multi-year contracts to not-for-profit organisations providing care services.
Answer
Current procurement legislation and guidance enables multi-year contracts for social care services. Scottish Government is working with procurement professionals and providers to consider how national procurement guidance can be updated to deliver on the Feeley Review recommendations which includes consideration of longer term contracts for providers, including not for profit providers. Scottish Government does not hold contracts for delivery of social care services. Local Government are the contract holders for social care services and will make decisions on contract terms including length.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 August 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kate Forbes on 8 September 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, regarding its policy to not use public money to support the manufacture of munitions or weapons, what its position is on whether an SSN submarine is a weapon in itself, as opposed to a naval vessel that may be used as a platform to carry conventional non-nuclear weapons or munitions.
Answer
As of 3 September 2025, the Scottish Government no longer has a policy prohibiting the use of public funds to support the manufacture of munitions.
- Asked by: Emma Roddick, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 25 August 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 8 September 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the compatibility of the provision of non-therapeutic male circumcision on the NHS with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Incorporation) (Scotland) Act 2024.
Answer
The Scottish Government is currently considering its guidance on non-therapeutic male circumcision. The Scottish Government takes the safety and wellbeing of all children and young people very seriously and we are committed to ensuring that children’s rights are respected, as set out in United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC).
- Asked by: Sharon Dowey, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 25 August 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 8 September 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the Scottish Parliament Information Centre briefing, Neurodevelopmental Pathways and Waiting Times in Scotland, which was published on 24 June 2025 and states that "NHS Ayrshire and Arran have no functioning operational pathway for adult neurodevelopmental assessments", what consideration it has given to the impact of the lack of such an operational pathway on community healthcare, and what its position is on whether it is sustainable for the NHS board to operate in such a way.
Answer
My officials have engaged with all health boards to understand what provision they have in place to deliver adult neurodevelopmental assessments. In relation to NHS Ayrshire and Arran, we are exploring how to address current issues that may be limiting access to assessments for all adults who may seek them. Our understanding is that neurodivergent adults in Ayrshire and Arran can be referred for neurodevelopmental assessments where they have been diagnosed with a co-occurring mental health condition.
The Scottish Government funds the National Autism Implementation Team (NAIT), which is currently supporting NHS Ayrshire and Arran to develop, enhance and redesign existing local adult neurodevelopmental services. We continue to scope the work required to improve Adult Neurodevelopmental Pathways nationally, understanding that a stepped care model is needed to reduce waiting times for adult neurodevelopmental assessments and ensure a consistent approach across Scotland.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 25 August 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 8 September 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many parents who have been offered a Baby Box declined to take one, in each year since their introduction.
Answer
The Scottish Government’s universal Baby Box programme, the only one in the UK, opened for registration on 15 June 2017 and nationwide delivery of Baby Boxes began on 15 August 2017. Every baby born and resident in Scotland is eligible for a Baby Box.
To receive a Baby Box parents have to opt in to receive a Baby Box through the registration process via their midwife.
The following table details the number of births registered each year, the number of Baby Box registrations and the number of families who did not register for a Baby Box.
Time period | Live Births | Registrations for Baby Boxes for babies due within period | Number of births not registered for Baby boxes within relevant period |
2024 | 45,763 | 40,712 | 5,051 |
2023 | 45,935 | 41,117 | 4,818 |
2022 | 46,959 | 41,207 | 5,752 |
2021 | 47,786 | 43,079 | 4,707 |
2020 | 46,809 | 45,877 | 932 |
2019 | 49,863 | 46,266 | 3,597 |
2018 | 51,308 | 47,702 | 3,606 |
Quarter 4 2017 | 12,821 | 11,730 | 1,091 |
Quarter 3 2017 | 13,847 | 6,171 | 7,676 |
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 15 August 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 8 September 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many current civil service posts have remained unallocated or functionless for more than six months.
Answer
‘Unallocated’ and ‘Functionless’ are not terms which are applied to the categorisation of roles within the Scottish Government.
The Scottish Government continually monitors its operations to ensure its resources are deployed as effectively and efficiently as possible. This is achieved through prioritisation, effective vacancy management and adapting to changing needs.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness and Nairn, Independent
-
Date lodged: Monday, 01 September 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 8 September 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what information it has on how many orders for witness anonymity under common law and section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, similar to those imposed by Lady Dorrian in the case HMA v Alexander Elliot Anderson Salmond, have been imposed in each year since 2015; in which cases they were imposed; whether it will provide details of the nature of the crimes involved in these cases, and whether there have been any other cases since 2015 where a similar type of order ensuring witness anonymity has been imposed under different provisions.
Answer
This question relates to operational matters that are the responsibility of the Scottish Court and Tribunals Service (SCTS) corporate body. The question has been passed to the Chief Executive of the SCTS who reply in writing within 20 days.
- Asked by: Richard Leonard, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 19 August 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 8 September 2025
To ask the Scottish Government when it expects discussions to begin between CalMac Ferries Ltd and the recognised trade unions regarding (a) commercial crewing levels and (b) route-specific sea trials for the MV (i) Isle of Islay, (ii) Glen Rosa, (iii) Loch Indaal, (iv) Lochmor and (v) Claymore.
Answer
Discussions have already taken place for the MV Isle of Islay in relation to commercial crewing levels in which trade unions, with the exception of RMT, have agreed the crew numbers.
A meeting will be scheduled by CalMac Ferries Ltd within the coming weeks with the RMT to continue discussions. This same approach will be taking forward for all new vessels entering service.
In regards to the route specific sea trials mentioned, CalMac have confirmed that once that vessel is under their operation, the vessel personnel will operate under the terms of their individual Seafarer Employment Agreements and Collective Agreements, which they do not envisage as needing to be re-negotiated.