- Asked by: Craig Hoy, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 21 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how much funding it has provided to businesses to enable them to pilot a four-day week in the current parliamentary session to date, and how much it estimates it will have provided in total by the end of the current parliamentary session.
Answer
No funding has been provided to any private business this parliamentary session to pilot a 4 day working week and there is currently no planned funding for Private Sector Pilots. The Scottish Government recognises the environmental, health and wellbeing benefits, and efficiency gains that a four-day working week could bring and have taken forward unique pilots in public sector organisations in Scotland.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 21 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many people were interviewed as part of the Pain Management Panel report, which was published in November 2022, broken down by NHS board area; what its position is on whether publishing the views of 16 people in the report presents a fair representation of the 800,000 people in Scotland who experience chronic pain; for what reason (a) the reported screening questionnaire used to produce the report did not directly ask participants about whether their condition had been diagnosed by a health professional and (b) respondents were reportedly paid £200 each to participate in the survey; whether known pain patient volunteers were asked to take part in the survey, and whether it sought guidance from NICE or any other body on the suitability of a "no impact" categorisation being used in the survey.
Answer
The Pain Management Panel consisted of 16 people with lived experience of chronic pain. A sampling framework was developed by The Lines Between to ensure diversity within the panel across participants’ experiences, circumstances, and characteristics. The sampling framework was designed to recruit 15 participants to the pain management panel with the intention to interview a group of 22-25 people to mitigate potential attrition during the project.
The Scottish Government does not hold information on how many people were interviewed.
The Scottish Government does not hold information on which NHS board area the volunteers lived in. More information on the demographics of the panel can be found in the report.
The Scottish Government does not hold any special category data, such as details of a medical diagnosis, for the participants of the pain management panel.
The Pain Management Panel is just one of the ways we engage with people with lived experience. The report was primarily intended to provide detailed qualitative information and illustrative examples of participants’ experience living with chronic pain, rather than being an exact representation of the prevalence of chronic pain in Scotland’s wider population.
Participants in the panel were reimbursed for their time in line with the Scottish Government’s guidelines.
This term ‘no impact’ was proposed by the Scottish Government as a contraction of ‘did not experience any limitation on life or work activities over the past three months’. This was designed to align with the questions in the Scottish Health Survey which showed that 22% of the more than 4000 adults surveyed did not experience any impact on their work or life activities.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus Robertson on 21 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what support it is providing for the renovation and restoration of the People’s Palace Museum and Winter Gardens at Glasgow Green.
Answer
The Scottish Government has not to date, provided any direct financial support for the People’s Palace redevelopment project. However, I understand that this project was accepted onto Historic Environment Scotland’s, Historic Environment Repair Grant programme in May 2023 and is currently going through the development process.
I will be meeting with Glasgow Life in the coming months to learn more about the project and the opportunities it could deliver for the local community, the wider heritage sector, Scotland’s economy, and tackling child poverty.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 21 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what progress has been made on its financial support of the Scottish Events Campus expansion project.
Answer
As substantial financial pressures persist, we are unable to confirm whether it is possible to provide financial support to fund the planned expansion of the Scottish Events Campus (SEC). However, we continue to be open to further engagement with the SEC, which has an excellent track record and reputation for hosting conferences, concerts and events, ranking highly as it does in the global Pollstar rankings and contributing to Scotland’s reputation as The Perfect Stage.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 21 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the cumulative impact of (a) existing, (b) consented and (c) proposed wind farm developments on (i) kittiwake, (ii) gannet, (iii) white-tailed eagle and (iv) hen harrier populations, and whether it will publish any underlying data modelling.
Answer
For offshore wind, as part of the environmental assessment processes undertaken for the updated Sectoral Marine Plan for Offshore Wind Energy, a cumulative assessment considering existing, consented and proposed impacts on protected seabird species is being undertaken and will published for consultation this Spring.
For onshore wind, at present, a full cumulative impact assessment across all onshore wind farm developments has not been undertaken.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 15 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Allan on 21 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to the Electricity Act 1989, what information it has on how many respondents to section 36 planning applications were not contacted by its Planning and Environmental Appeals Division (DPEA) in advance of a public inquiry, when they should have been, in each of the last five years, broken down by inquiry.
Answer
The Planning and Environmental Appeals Division (DPEA) are not aware that this has been a recurring issue other than for one recent specific case, where Energy Consents Unit (ECU) hadn’t initially passed all representee contact details to them from the outset. Steps were taken to ensure no parties were prejudiced and all who wanted to take part in the process were given the opportunity to do so.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 08 May 2025
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 21 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will escalate the emergency repairs and "living ruin" project at Springburn Winter Gardens from the reserve list of the Regeneration Capital Grant Fund projects for the 2025-26 financial year, in light of it being an at-risk, category A-listed landmark building that is surrounded by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation decile 1 and quintile 1 areas.
Answer
It was not possible to support all of the submitted projects within the available budget. There is currently no scope to support the reserved projects however should additional budget become available this will be considered. As part of the pipeline approach reserved projects can be considered for support in future years, subject to annual budget availability.
- Asked by: Pam Duncan-Glancy, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 08 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 21 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will clarify the meaning of its aim to "rationalise the qualifications offer in the senior phase", and how it will do this.
Answer
I made it clear when responding to the Independent Review of Qualifications and Assessment (IRQA) in September last year that it is vitally important that all young people have a clear and coherent senior phase offer, which aligns with pathways that are available in both higher and further education, and on into employment.
As indicated in the Scottish Government response to the IRQA, the work to rationalise the qualifications offer in the senior phase will be undertaken by the current qualifications body and subsequently Qualifications Scotland. The work should ensure high-quality qualifications in senior phase that:
- suit all pupils regardless of their age, stage, and ambition;
- is clear and easy for pupils to understand and navigate;
- delivers greater parity of esteem between different qualification types;
- delivers the skills and knowledge to grow our economy and
- will be maintained, reviewed and updated on a regular basis.
During 2024-25 SQA worked with stakeholders to identify and remove underutilised qualifications from their portfolio and, after extensive engagement, will remove 143 qualifications mostly on the grounds of no or low uptake.
An essential part of rationalisation of the senior phase offer will be guided by the evidence gathered from reviewing the types of qualifications available, patterns of delivery, their intended purposes, and how effectively they are fulfilling those purposes.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 08 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 21 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how much of the £2.64 million awarded to the Glasgow Meat Market sheds regeneration project by the Regeneration Capital Grant Fund in the 2021-22 financial year has been spent to date.
Answer
£636,431.99 has been spent to date.
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 08 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 21 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how much of the Low Emission Zone (LEZ) Retrofit Fund has been allocated to be used for businesses in Aberdeen's LEZ since its introduction, and how much of that allocation was distributed to businesses.
Answer
£8,100,000 has been allocated to the Low Emission Zone (LEZ) Retrofit Fund in Scotland since 2020. There was no allocation per city in order to allow flexibility to respond to demand dependant on applications received each year.
26 applications for this funding have been received from businesses in the Aberdeen area. The majority of applications were rejected due to applicants not meeting the eligibility requirements. 4 applicants were eligible and offered funding, however only 2 accepted these offers. The amount received by these businesses to support retrofitting of vehicles to meet LEZ standards was £14,066 in total.
Over 98% of the vehicles retrofitted through this scheme have been taxis and mostly within Edinburgh and Glasgow. Lower demand retrofit funding in Aberdeen may be attributed to a combination of local taxi licencing conditions and vehicle eligibility, combined with an LEZ exemption for taxis in the city.