- Asked by: Neil Bibby, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 November 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Humza Yousaf on 20 December 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what data it holds on the waiting times for ophthalmology care in (a) an outpatient setting and (b) day cases, in each NHS board area from (i) 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021 and (ii) 1 April to 25 November 2021.
Answer
The link below leads to the latest elective waiting times publication which was published on Tuesday 30 November for the quarter ending 30 Sep 2021. This provides number of patients waiting and seen by specialty for outpatients and inpatient / day cases.
Stage of treatment waiting times - Inpatients, day cases and new outpatients 30 November 2021 - NHS waiting times - stage of treatment - Publications - Public Health Scotland
The split between inpatient and day case is not published. in addition, this publication only covers details up to the end of September 2021, with the information on the quarter ending 31 December 2021 due to be published at the end of February.
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 29 November 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 20 December 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what funding (a) it and (b) Zero Waste Scotland has provided to local authorities to help them to promote their recycling and re-use services, in each year since 2011.
Answer
Through Zero Waste Scotland, Scottish Government has provided the amounts shown in the table below, since 2011, directly to support local authorities’ recycling and re-use services. These grants included support for communications.
Year | Local Authority Recycling & Reuse Support grants |
2011-12 | £3,182,681 |
2012-13 | £6,203,051 |
2013-14 | £9,149,943 |
2014-15 | £7,626,023 |
2015-16 | £3,960,213 |
2016-17 | £2,401,370 |
2017-18 | £3,443,053 |
2018-19 | £1,787,127 |
2019-20 | £1,248,233 |
2020-21 | £1,016,949 (costs related to supporting local authorities during pandemic) |
In addition to this funding, the second table below shows direct support for local authorities for communications support since 2011, where communications were not related directly to wider recycling and reuse grant awards.
Year | Specific recycling/reuse communications funding |
2011-12 | 678,500 |
2012-13 | 39,900 |
2013-14 | £64,704 + additional included in recycling costs above where relevant |
2014-15 | £220,852 |
2015-16 | £1,611,301 |
2016-17 | N/A included in wider recycling reuse grants above |
2017-18 | N/A included in wider recycling reuse grants above |
2018-19 | N/A included in wider recycling reuse grants above |
2019-20 | £30,000 |
2020-21 | Costs not yet available |
The funding set out in the tables is over and above monies provided through the Local Government Settlement, which for 2022-23 was over £12.5bn. Local councils are responsible for deciding how to spend revenue and operate day-to-day services.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 30 November 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Humza Yousaf on 20 December 2021
To ask the Scottish Government how many patients have (a) contracted and (b) died from fungal infections at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, since the public inquiry was announced in June 2020.
Answer
The information requested relating to how many patients a) contracted and (b) died from fungal infections at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital is not centrally held by the Scottish Government, due to the possibility of patient identifiable information.
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 December 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 17 December 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what (a) strategy and (b) resilience planning was undertaken to account for the possibility of extraordinary events, such as Storm Arwen, occurring during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated measures, such as lockdown.
Answer
Resilience structures in Scotland are designed to be adaptable and responsive to a wide range of risks.
Ministers regularly receive briefing on specific risks or emergencies throughout the year and the Scottish Government’s resilience arrangements constantly monitor for emerging issues and threats.
In the autumn of 2021, recognising the heightened risk of concurrent events – including COVID, winter weather, and supply chain issues – additional reporting and monitoring arrangements were put in place to ensure Ministers retain a close oversight of the complex and overlapping risk picture. Since 30 September, this has included daily reporting and weekly meetings of SGORR, with assessments on the key concurrent risks facing Government and planning activity being taken.
- Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 December 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Clare Haughey on 17 December 2021
To ask the Scottish Government how many young people have been matched with an adopter via Scotland’s Adoption Register in each year since 2011.
Answer
This information is publically available on the Scottish Adoption Register’s Website in the Annual Report for 2021-21
Year | Number of Matches |
2011-12 | 8 |
2012-13 | 34 |
2013-14 | 59 |
2014-15 | 78 |
2015-16 | 89 |
2016-17 | 92 |
2017-18 | 96 |
2018-19 | 100 |
2019-20 | 75 |
2020-21 | 81 |
- Asked by: Edward Mountain, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 03 December 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Humza Yousaf on 17 December 2021
To ask the Scottish Government when work will resume on developing proposals for an additional medical school in Scotland.
Answer
The September 2019 Programme for Government commitment to develop proposals for a new medical school was paused in March 2020 due to the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic. We are currently considering how this commitment can be implemented or linked to the new Programme for Government (PfG) Commitment to increase medical undergraduates by 100 per year and to double the number of Widening Access places over the lifetime of this parliament.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 December 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Humza Yousaf on 17 December 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the pressure that existing NHS staff are reportedly under in carrying out their day-to-day responsibilities, how it is ensuring that mandatory staff training is provided to newly recruited staff.
Answer
The Staff Governance Standard, which has legislative underpinning, requires all health Boards to demonstrate that they are ensuring that staff are appropriately trained and developed and that resources, including time and funding, are appropriately allocated to meet local training and development needs taking into account the current priorities of both the service and service users.
Boards are expected to have systems in place to identify areas that require improvement and to develop action plans that will describe how improvements will be made. The Scottish Government also seek assurance from all Boards that they are meeting the Standard through the annual Staff Governance Monitoring exercise.
- Asked by: Gillian Mackay, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 03 December 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 17 December 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-04467 by Maree Todd on 30 November 2021, whether gamete storage is provided by the NHS to people who are considering or undertaking gender transitioning.
Answer
NHS Scotland will consider fertility preservation and gamete storage for patients who have been assessed and referred by the Gender Identity Service as suitable for gender reassignment.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 December 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 17 December 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what steps it is taking, in addition to encouraging natural ventilation, to make classrooms safer learning environments for children during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Answer
The Scottish Government Reducing Risks in Schools guidance contains a range of mitigations, such as use of face coverings, distancing requirements in schools and on school transport, and guidance for visitors and in-school events. This guidance is currently under active review, with input this week from the COVID-19 Education Recovery Group and the Advisory Sub-Group on Education and Children's Issues . A new version will be published this week. The guidance will remain under regular review and, where the scientific advice supports it, mitigations will be enhanced or removed as appropriate.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Friday, 03 December 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 17 December 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what the (a) target and (b) actual average timescale has been for assessing applications for grant assistance to deliver affordable housing above Affordable Housing Investment Benchmark level, in each quarter since Q1 2016.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not set a target timescale for assessing applications for grant assistance to deliver affordable housing above the applicable affordable housing investment benchmark level.
Using information from our Housing and Regeneration Programme system (HARP), we have compiled the following table showing the average calendar days from the initial tender application submission date to the actual tender approval date for those projects submitted at above benchmark level over the period Quarter 3 2017-18 to Quarter 2 2021-22. It should be noted, however, that while we encourage early engagement on likely project costs prior to tender applications being submitted, there can be instances where applications have missing information or require further, more detailed work by the grant applicant before they can be fully assessed.
Financial year quarter | Total projects approved above the applicable benchmark | Average time between the initial tender submission and the actual approval date |
(calendar days) |
2016-17 Q1 | 5 | Data not available |
2016-17 Q2 | 7 | Data not available |
2016-17 Q3 | 20 | Data not available |
2016-17 Q4 | 45 | Data not available |
2016-17 Total/ Average | 77 | Data not available |
2017-18 Q1 | 16 | Data not available |
2017-18 Q2 | 14 | Data not available |
2017-18 Q3 | 14 | 22 |
2017-18 Q4 | 41 | 19 |
2017-18 Total/ Average | 85 | 20 |
2018-19 Q1 | 10 | 41 |
2018-19 Q2 | 13 | 30 |
2018-19 Q3 | 22 | 33 |
2018-19 Q4 | 47 | 26 |
2018-19 Total/ Average | 92 | 30 |
2019-20 Q1 | 19 | 31 |
2019-20 Q2 | 14 | 38 |
2019-20 Q3 | 35 | 25 |
2019-20 Q4 | 82 | 25 |
2019-20 Total/ Average | 150 | 27 |
2020-21 Q1 | 9 | 19 |
2020-21 Q2 | 16 | 44 |
2020-21 Q3 | 17 | 27 |
2020-21 Q4 | 30 | 29 |
2020-21 Total/ Average | 72 | 31 |
2021-22 Q1 | 12 | 21 |
2021-22 Q2 | 21 | 42 |
2021-22 Total/ Average | 33 | 35 |
Data on tender submission dates from Quarter 1, 2016-17 to Quarter 2, 2017-18 is not available as this pre-dated our HARP system and the historic information was not migrated to HARP.