- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 09 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 7 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether the shooting of native woodcock is regulated through a licensing scheme.
Answer
There is no licensing scheme regulating the shooting of woodcock in Scotland. Resident and migratory woodcock can only be shot during the open season, which is between 1 September and 31 January, as set out in the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. Outwith these dates, woodcock cannot be taken or killed.
- Asked by: Katy Clark, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 09 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 7 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what plans it has to review whether the Scottish Futures Trust is ideally placed and qualified to manage the Learning Estate Investment Programme.
Answer
The Learning Estate Investment Programme’s (LEIP) outcomes Governance Board, which is co-chaired by Scottish Government and COSLA, scrutinises all aspects of the LEIP on an ongoing basis.
The LEIP has undergone a Gateway Review Strategic Assessment, the recommendations of which have been implemented across the LEIP. A further Gateway Review will commence this month.
Scottish Futures Trust (SFT) provides expertise, for example, in programme and data management, schools design, as well as commercial and financial modelling, and the Scottish Government engages regularly with SFT on ongoing management of the LEIP. SFT also managed the previous Scotland’s Schools for the Future Programme which saw the construction of 117 new or refurbished schools and benefited over 60,000 pupils across the country.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 09 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 7 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether it is considering introducing further restrictions on the shooting of native woodcock, in light of the reported decline in European woodcock populations over the last 10 years, current pressures from bird flu and the unusually cold winter.
Answer
The Scottish Government understands concerns over the decline of European woodcock populations. At present, all woodcock in Scotland are classed as a quarry species and as such are listed on Schedule 2 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, which determines the species that can be killed or taken.
As set out in my response to PQ S6W-14320, NatureScot are currently carrying out a review of Schedule 2 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. Once the review has been completed, they will provide a report to the Scottish Government for Ministers to consider whether any changes to the Schedule are required.
- Asked by: Bob Doris, MSP for Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Initiated by the Scottish Government.
Answered by Jamie Hepburn on 7 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on the implementation of the Career Review recommendations.
Answer
Today the Career Review Programme Board, chaired by Grahame Smith, have published the Career Review: Final Report, titled 'Skills and experiences to grow and succeed in a rapidly changing world' . This report concludes a comprehensive review of Scotland's career services and provides detail on how the ten recommendations that the Scottish Government accepted in February 2022 will be taken forward.
The report is available at www.careerreview.scot
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 27 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 7 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, further to Recommendation 7 in the first report of the independent review of the role of incineration in the waste hierarchy, what consideration is being given in discussions with local authorities regarding the development of solutions to manage residual waste ahead of the landfill ban in 2025.
Answer
The independent review of the role of incineration in the waste hierarchy recommended that in view of the upcoming ban on landfilling biodegradable municipal waste, Scottish Government should work with local authorities to ensure they have a solution to manage their residual waste in 2025. The ban is in line with Committee on Climate Change recommendations and will come into force on 31 December 2025.
Through work overseen by a dedicated Programme Board (which includes representation from Cosla, SOLACE, SEPA and Zero Waste Scotland), we are continuing to support local authorities to collaboratively secure landfill ban compliant residual waste treatment options. We are doing this by facilitating collaborative procurement and funding provision of additional technical, procurement and legal support.
We will continue to work closely with local authorities and commercial operators to support those that do not currently have solutions to treat their residual waste ahead of the forthcoming ban.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 27 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 7 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-15004 by Richard Lochhead on 23 February 2023, whether it will work with Glasgow City Council, the Glasgow City Region Cabinet and COSLA, to determine the feasibility of raising capital for the proposed Levelling Up Fund projects through the issuing of sub-sovereign bonds.
Answer
I appreciate the disappointment the Glasgow City Region will be experiencing following the UK Government’s decision not to support their bids for Levelling Up funding.
Any borrowing by local authorities, whether it’s through the public works loans board or through the issuance of bonds, is for local authorities to determine affordability themselves, subject to the conditions of their prudential borrowing regime.
However, any decisions to permit local authorities to issue bonds would require Ministerial consent. Ambitious investment strategies have led to financial insolvency in certain English local authorities and therefore this would require very careful consideration. My officials would be happy to discuss proposals with Glasgow City Council.
- Asked by: Katy Clark, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 23 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Christina McKelvie on 7 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what consideration it has given to establishing the post of an Older People’s Commissioner.
Answer
We do not have plans to introduce legislation to establish an Older People’s Commissioner. There are existing commissions that protect the rights of older people. The Scottish Human Rights Commission (SHRC) and the UK Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) already play a role in relation to the rights of older people in respect of age as a protected equality characteristic. In addition, we continue to work closely with the Older People’s Strategic Action Forum on a range of priorities for advancing age equality.
We are committed to promoting the rights of older people and ensuring that they benefit from all that we are doing to improve people’s lives. That is why we provide over £2.2million to support older people's organisations to tackle inequality and discrimination and support our aim to promote the rights of older people.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 7 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what information it has on how much has been spent on providing people with emergency accommodation in each year since 1999, broken down by local authority area.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not collect data on local authority expenditure for the provision of emergency accommodation to households experiencing homelessness. This information would need to be requested from each local authority directly.
The majority of homelessness funding since 1999 has been provided to local authorities through the annual local government finance settlement, which is £13.2 billion in 2023-24. Each local authority is responsible for managing and administering their own budget on the basis of local needs and priorities, and have discretion as to how they use this resource to prevent and respond to homelessness, including providing emergency accommodation. This has been supplemented in recent years by £5.5 million from the Scottish Government’s health and housing budgets for the Housing First pathfinder and identifiable resource as follows:
Financial Year | Rapid Rehousing Transition Plans | Homelessness Support |
2017-18 | £0m | £22.5m |
2018-19 | £2m | £23.5m |
2019-20 | £8m | £23.5m |
2020-21 | £13m [1] | £23.5m |
2021-22 | £8m | £23.5m |
2022-23 | £8m | £23.5m |
Total | £34m | £140.0m |
[1] The Scottish Government provided an additional £5 million to local authorities for rapid rehousing transition plans in December 2020 as part of its Winter Plan for Social Protection.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 7 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how many reports have been made to Police Scotland in each of the last five years regarding breaches of the short-term let licensing legislation.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not hold this information. Licensing schemes are administered by licensing authorities. The Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 (Licensing of Short-term Lets) Order 2022 came into force on 1 March 2022, and required licensing authorities to establish schemes in their areas by 1 October 2022.
- Asked by: Katy Clark, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 09 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 7 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what actions it is taking on each of the headline recommendations made in Audit Scotland’s 2020 review, Privately financed infrastructure investment: The Non-Profit Distributing (NPD) and hub models.
Answer
The Scottish Government welcomed Audit Scotland’s report, which provided useful lessons which we are already implementing through successor schemes to the NPD and hub models which the report considered. These schemes allowed us to deliver much needed new schools, new NHS facilities, new colleges and other key infrastructure that would otherwise not have been possible. They also provided a significant boost to the Scottish economy at a time of constrained private sector investment.
The eleven main recommendations in the Audit Scotland report are in included within the following tables along with accompanying Scottish Government comments.
The Scottish Government should:
REPORT RECOMMENDATION | SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT COMMENTS |
1. Better document and report how decisions on the use of private finance are made at a programme level, and how the overall combination of programme and project funding aims to maximise investment and benefits (paragraph 29) | The Scottish Government’s five-year Infrastructure Investment Plan (IIP) published in February 2021 showed how we will enhance our approach to choosing the right future investments and introduced a new infrastructure investment hierarchy. We consulted on the new IIP to ensure the right final approach that benefits the whole of Scotland both now and in the future. The IIP builds on the recommendations of the independent Infrastructure Commission for Scotland. As a result of the Commission and consultation, the IIP includes the following: ? An expanded definition of infrastructure to include Natural Infrastructure. ? A new investment hierarchy framework to prioritise making the most of existing infrastructure ahead of building new assets. ? Commitments to develop new methods of appraisal and prioritisation to ensure they match long-term goals. ? A commitment to prepare a cross-sector infrastructure needs assessment to inform the next Infrastructure Investment Plan. ? A commitment to develop a broader approach to public engagement in forward infrastructure plans. |
2. Better communicate the rationale of project financing and funding decisions to public sector organisations and Parliament (paragraph 32) | Local authorities determine their own programmes for capital investment and are required by legislation to comply with The Prudential Code for Capital Finance in Local Authorities, which was developed by the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA). The Prudential Code requires local authorities to ensure that all capital investment decisions are prudent, affordable and sustainable. |
3. Continue to monitor existing NPD and hub projects to review if the models are successfully achieving their original aims, and documenting lessons learned (Parts 2 and 3) | The Scottish Government annually update and publish information relating to contracts within the NPD programme which includes unitary charge payments, fixed debt providers, SPV’s and equity holders. This information is available from the following link www.gov.scot/npd . The Scottish Futures Trust also publishes NPD and hub DBFM investor information as well as NPD and hub financial indicator information. This is available from the following respective links www.scottishfuturestrust.org.uk/npd www.scottishfuturestrust.org.uk/hub |
4. Set out how the MIM will operate, and establish clear criteria for selecting programmes and monitoring risks (paragraph 88) | The approach to the Mutual Investment Model (MIM) governance is being developed and considered following SFT’s options appraisal. The use of MIM is being considered alongside a range of financing approaches including capital grant, capital borrowing, financial transactions and other forms of finance when determining how to finance projects. |
5. Develop its public reporting to provide more information on the costs and benefits of using private finance, the management of risks and outcomes delivered, and its contribution to supporting economic policies and growth (paragraph 97) | The Scottish Government monitor the affordability of revenue financed investment through imposing a cap on revenue commitments which is assessed as part of the annual budget process. This is in place to ensure that revenue-funded methods of investment are used at a sustainable level and do not overly constrain our choices in future years. Procuring authorities have governance processes in place to evaluate their revenue financed projects through for example, post project reviews and post project evaluations. They also monitor the contractual commitments of the private sector in delivering the associated public facilities for use. A key requirement of the NPD programme was to deliver local community benefits and support the local economy. The Scottish Futures Trust have confirmed that contractual targets were exceeded for the number of work placements, graduates and apprentices employed and the construction phases supported approximately 8,000 jobs across Scotland. This information is available from the following link www.scottishfuturestrust.org.uk/community-benefits The Scottish Government publish an annual progress report relating to the Infrastructure Investment Plan which outlines the contribution made to economic development by major capital projects. This is available from the following link www.gov.scot/iip-progress-report |
The Scottish Futures Trust should:
REPORT RECOMMENDATION | SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT COMMENTS |
6. Demonstrate more clearly the links between the financial savings attributed to centralised activity and individual projects (paragraph 52) | From 2019-20, SFT changed its approach of reporting from financial benefits (i.e., an annual Benefits Statement) to Outcomes Reporting. In SFT’s 2019-24 Corporate Plan, it published ten infrastructure outcomes which further the goals of the Scottish Government’s National Performance Framework (NPF). Together with many public and private sector partners SFT are working to deliver business objectives which are aligned to those ten infrastructure outcomes. SFT’s latest updated Outcomes Report was published on 17 November 2022 and is available from the following link www.scottishfuturestrust.org.uk/outcomes |
7. Monitor any secondary market transactions in hub equity and NPD and hub Special Purpose Vehicle equity to record ownership and, potentially, to inform the design of future privately financed contracts (paragraphs 58 and 76). | The Scottish Futures Trust publishes NPD / hub DBFM investor information as well as NPD / hub financial indicator information. This is available from the following respective links: www.scottishfuturestrust.org.uk/npd www.scottishfuturestrust.org.uk/hub The Scottish Government also annually update and publish information relating to contracts within the NPD programme which includes unitary charge payments, fixed debt providers, SPV’s and equity holders. This information is available from the following link www.gov.scot/npd If private sector companies subsequently choose to ‘trade’ future income for upfront cash, the initial investors accelerate their return, but no additional profit is made over the life of the project. This does not increase what is paid by the public sector, or impact the value-for-money of the underlying NPD contracts |
Councils and other public sector organisations should:
REPORT RECOMMENDATION | SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT COMMENTS |
8. Systematically assess the implications of participating in the financing and contract approaches led by the Scottish Government, before going ahead with individual projects (paragraphs 30–32) | The NPD programme allowed the delivery of much needed new infrastructure such as schools, new NHS facilities, new colleges and other key infrastructure that would otherwise not have been possible. Audit Scotland reported this, and that NPD had supported £3.3 billion of additional investment in Scotland’s infrastructure. In relation to NPD projects, the Scottish Futures Trust published a ‘Value for Money Assessment Guidance: Capital Programmes and Projects’ on behalf of the Scottish Government which described the value for money process for capital programmes and projects and the requirements that Procuring Authorities need to consider before making relevant investment decisions. This included guidance on Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments. The guidance was mandatory for all capital programmes and projects for the Scottish Government, its associated Directorates, Executive Agencies, Non-Departmental Public Bodies and for all public bodies in receipt of funding from the Scottish Government or its Agencies. Other accompanying guidance notes were also subsequently published. See also recommendation 2. |
9. Clearly report current commitments under privately financed contracts, and the ongoing commitments related to these, as part of their annual budget setting (paragraph 32) | See recommendation 2. |
10. Review all projects and services procured through the hubs to assess the costs, savings and benefits against other procurement options (page 29). | See recommendation 1. |
The Scottish Government and councils should:
REPORT RECOMMENDATION | SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT COMMENTS |
11. Continue to work together to develop arrangements for the new schools investment funding model, ensuring opportunities and risks are fully understood and properly managed (paragraph 93). | The first phase of school projects to benefit from the Learning Estate Investment Programme (LEIP) were announced in September 2019 and a second phase was announced in December 2020 (37 projects in total). The first LEIP projects started construction during the summer of 2021. Phase 3 of LEIP was opened to local authorities in 2022 and we hope to announce the successful projects soon. |