- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 16 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether it is working on any further agreements regarding the private finance funding of nature restoration, in light of the recently announced agreement between NatureScot, Hampden & Co, Lombard Odier Investment Managers and Palladium.
Answer
Through the National Strategy for Economic Transformation, the Scottish Government has committed to “establish a values-led, high-integrity market for responsible private investment in natural capital, supported by a national project pipeline for nature-based solutions”. This work is underpinned by our Interim Principles for Responsible Investment in Natural Capital, which can be found at the following link - https://www.gov.scot/publications/interim-principles-for-responsible-investment-in-natural-capital/ . These ensure investments deliver genuine benefits to the environment, support local communities and conform with the principles of a just transition.
NatureScot’s agreement with Hampden & Co, Lombard Odier and Palladium, announced on 1 March 2023, will help to deliver these commitments by creating new jobs, working with local communities and businesses, and bringing about landscape-scale restoration of natural capital. Neither NatureScot nor the Scottish Government are currently working on any other similar agreements. The Facility for Investment Ready Nature in Scotland (FIRNS), launched in February this year, will also support the establishment of a values-led, high-integrity market by helping organisations that seek to develop projects that use responsible private investment and market-based mechanisms to restore Scotland’s natural environment.
- Asked by: Oliver Mundell, MSP for Dumfriesshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 16 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what percentage of Food Standards Scotland’s annual budget has been spent on investigations in each of the last three years.
Answer
Food Standards Scotland has a dedicated Food and Feed Incident Team comprising a Head of Incidents, an Incident Manager and three incident officers. The team is also assisted by a Support Team comprising a Support Manager and Support Officer. These two individuals assist in the investigation of food- feed incidents, however, much of their time is spent on other divisional priorities.
When identifying the spend on food- feed investigations, consideration has been given to staffing costs along with other associated costs linked with carrying out the investigations. The spend is assuming the full time cost of all members of staff, including the support team.
The following table presents the annual spend on incidents for the last 3 years and the percentage of the overall Food Standards Scotland budget this reflects.
Year | Spend on Incidents | % of FSS budget |
2020- 2021 | 210,806 | 1.1%** |
2021- 2022 | 299,686* | 1.4%** |
2022- 2023 | 380,955 | 1.7%** |
* The Head of incidents and 1 of the Incident Officers were introduced between October and December 2021
**Rounded to the nearest 0.1%
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 16 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how many people currently employed by private companies that it contracts to deliver services are paid at least £10.90 an hour or an equivalent salary.
Answer
In our Scottish Government procurement: annual report 2021 to 2022 we reported that 94% of our contractors are committed to paying the real Living Wage, an increase of 2% points over the previous year. The Scottish Government considers Fair Work criteria on a case-by-case basis and requires suppliers to pay the real Living Wage to workers involved in the delivery of our contracts where it is relevant to the contract, non-discriminatory and proportionate to do so. We do not hold information about the specific number of contractor staff who benefit from this commitment.
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 16 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what analysis it has undertaken in the last five years on the impact of noise pollution on health.
Answer
Through Scotland’s implementation of the European Commission Environmental Noise Directive (Directive 2002/49/EC), Scottish Government ministers have a responsibility to produce noise maps of Scotland every five years. The fourth round of noise mapping is currently being undertaken. Action plans for the current round of noise mapping will be submitted in 2024 and will include the provision of information, consultation, and ultimate decision making on the issues of noise management.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 03 March 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 16 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what consideration it has given to developing a Scottish patients trial charter, to improve access to clinical trials.
Answer
The Scottish Government is not currently considering the development of a Scottish patients clinical trials charter.
On 13 February 2023 the Scottish Government published an independent report on Improving Equity of Access to Cancer Clinical Trials in Scotland. We will be working with the cancer clinical research community to prioritise and develop the report's 51 recommendations.
Improving equity of access to cancer clinical trials in Scotland - gov.scot (www.gov.scot)
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 16 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide details, including a list of attendees, of any discussions that it was involved in, or facilitated between producers and retailers, to (a) approve Circularity Scotland as the Deposit Return Scheme administrator and (b) confer any exclusive rights on Circularity Scotland in relation to the collection of scheme articles.
Answer
Circularity Scotland submitted an application to Scottish Ministers for approval to become a scheme administrator. Drinks producers, wholesalers and retailers across Scotland collaborated to create Circularity Scotland and support its application to become a scheme administrator. The Scottish Government did not engage in discussions with producers or retailers with regards to Circularity Scotland’s application. While Circularity Scotland is the only approved scheme administrator, it does not have exclusive rights in relation to the collection of scheme articles. There is no limit on the number of scheme administrators that can operate within the scheme.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 16 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how many public swimming pools have closed in each local authority area in each year since 1999.
Answer
The information requested is not held centrally by the Scottish Government.
We recognise the importance of swimming pools and other sports facilities in supporting the physical and mental health of the nation. sport scotland, our national agency for sport, are supporting Scottish Swimming to deliver the Scottish Swimming Facilities Project to accurately understand the current swimming pool provision, life cycle and predict the landscape in the short, medium and long term.
We have asked sport scotland to write to Mr Miles Briggs MSP with more details of the Scottish Swimming Facilities Project and to keep him updated as it progresses.
- Asked by: Jamie Halcro Johnston, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 16 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government on what date Transport Scotland first raised concerns with the Scottish Ministers that the 2025 deadline for completing the dualling of the A9 between Perth and Inverness was not achievable.
Answer
Transport Scotland applied its normal risk management practices from the beginning of its work on the A9 Dualling programme to the identification and assessment of factors that could affect delivery of the programme. Individual factors were raised with Ministers as relevant to issues on which Ministers were periodically briefed.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 16 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how many (a) adults and (b) children have received hospice care in each year since 1999.
Answer
This is a matter for independent hospices, Health Boards and Health and Social Care Partnerships. The information requested is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 16 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether it is the case that the removal of the M8 Woodside Viaducts between junctions 16 and 17 was not to be considered prior to commissioning a propping and repairs programme, and, if this is the case, what process was followed to determine such an approach, and who was authorised to make such a decision in the reported absence of wider consultation.
Answer
The M8 Woodside Viaduct is a vital element of the motorway and road network serving Glasgow, the wider region and country, carrying approximately 150,000 vehicles per day. The decision to restrict traffic lanes on the viaducts was made for safety reasons by Transport Scotland’s Director of Roads, as reducing the live traffic loading on the structure was a key aspect to its management, continued use and repair.
Demolishing the structure was ruled out due to the economic, environmental and social impacts on businesses and communities served by the local and trunk road network, including the costs, durations and traffic volumes involved. The refurbishment option was considered to have less economic, social, traffic and environmental impacts. This decision was supported by stakeholders, who expressed significant concern over the impact of lane closures, let alone full closure of the viaduct.