- Asked by: Finlay Carson, MSP for Galloway and West Dumfries, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 April 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 25 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the UK Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act 2023, how much correspondence it has received on the issue of gene editing in Scotland since the start of 2023.
Answer
The Scottish Government records and processes correspondence addressed to Scottish Ministers on its Ministerial and Corporate Correspondence (MiCase) System. Since the start of 2023, there have been three pieces of correspondence regarding gene editing recorded and processed via the MiCase system.
Scottish Government officials are also in frequent contact with a range of stakeholders and officials in other UK administrations, where gene editing may form part of ongoing correspondence around regular liaison meetings on a range of policy topics.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 April 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 25 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-15872 by Lorna Slater on 24 March 2023, regarding its reference to all capital costs being met by investors, whether that is the capital costs of any planting or peatland restoration scheme remaining after payments from forest or peatland grant schemes and other contributing payments from other Scottish Government funds to the land owners or managers concerned, and what the estimated proportion is of the total capital costs involved that will be paid for by contributions from (a) Scottish Government funds, (b) private investor funds and (c) the landowners.
Answer
Private investment from the partnership will cover all capital costs although land managers may also choose to apply to existing grant schemes, in which case there will be a mix of funding. The usual processes and policies for public grants will apply.
Until investment cases have been completed and agreements reached with individual land managers, it is not possible to determine the proportion of funding that will each come from private investment, existing grant schemes and, if applicable, landowners. It is likely that this will vary from project to project.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 April 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lorna Slater on 25 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-15870 by Lorna Slater on 24 March 2023, whether the Scottish Land Commission agreed to the wording referring to it prior to the publication of the Memorandum of Understanding, and what the estimated monetary value of staff resources is that will be deployed by the Scottish Land Commission and NatureScot in support of the private wealth investments envisaged.
Answer
Not being a party to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), the Scottish Land Commission did not provide comment or input into its wording. The MOU published in March incorrectly listed the Scottish Land Commission as having a decision making role on the project board, rather than correctly identifying its role as advisory. Both NatureScot and the Scottish Land Commission have since clarified the role of the SLC with the partnership.
As this partnership is at an early stage, NatureScot is currently not able to provide an estimate of the staff resource costs associated with this work. The Scottish Land Commission’s advisory role will be provided in line with its existing good practice programme.
- Asked by: Oliver Mundell, MSP for Dumfriesshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 03 April 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 25 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how many applications for slurry storage have been received through the Agri-Environment Climate Scheme for 2023.
Answer
61 Slurry Storage applications will be considered for funding through the Agri-Environment Climate Scheme for 2023.
- Asked by: Jeremy Balfour, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 06 April 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 25 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what action it can take to remove any charges for the completion of the Debt and Mental Health Evidence Form in Scotland.
Answer
The Scottish Government is not looking to revise the GP contract to affect the ability of GP practices to charge for voluntary completion of Debt and Mental Health Evidence Forms in Scotland. This is not work that could be considered covered by general medical services funding so if GP practices are not permitted to charge, there is a risk they will not carry out the work when requested.
- Asked by: Donald Cameron, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 06 April 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jamie Hepburn on 25 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how many civil servants will be allocated to work for the Minister for Independence.
Answer
The majority of civil servants are not allocated to work directly for individual Ministers as part of their roles in supporting and delivering the Scottish Government’s priorities. Work related to my responsibilities is no different.
I have one member of staff allocated to work in my private office.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 April 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Siobhian Brown on 25 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what it is doing to support victims of human trafficking who are trafficked to Scotland and forced to work or beg for their handlers.
Answer
Any form of human trafficking or exploitation is completely unacceptable.
The Human Trafficking and Exploitation (Scotland) Act 2015, which was passed unanimously by the Scottish Parliament, gives police and prosecutors greater powers to detect and bring to justice those responsible for trafficking as well as strengthening protections for survivors.
In the current financial year, Migrant Help and the Trafficking Awareness Raising Alliance will share over £2.1m to support adult victims of human trafficking and exploitation. We are also providing funding to Justice and Care to support two Victim Navigators who work alongside Police Scotland's National Human Trafficking Unit; funding to JustRight Scotland to support the work of their Scottish Anti-Trafficking Centre, including the provision of early legal advice to potential victims. Furthermore, we are funding Survivors of Human Trafficking in Scotland to deliver a long-term support pilot to those recovering and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde to provide a national psychological trauma support service to adult trafficking victims.
We will continue to work with partners across Scotland and beyond to provide support to victims and combat those who seek to profit from the exploitation of others.
- Asked by: Sandesh Gulhane, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 April 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 25 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government when the findings of its Health and Wellbeing Census, showing how frequently S2-S4 pupils use e-cigarettes, will be published.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-15719 on 22 March 2023. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers
- Asked by: Brian Whittle, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 April 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 25 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will outline the rationale for the increased funding for the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh from £28.7 million in 2022-23 to £33.8 million in 2023-24, and whether it will provide further information on what this increased expenditure is expected to cover.
Answer
The increase in funding to the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (RBGE) in 2023/24 reflects re-profiled spending plans for the Edinburgh Biomes project.
- Asked by: Pam Gosal, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 03 April 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 25 April 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether it plans to conduct a review of gender identity services for children and young people, similar to the Cass Review in England.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not seek to replicate the work of the Cass Review. However, as we have previously stated, the interim findings of that Review continue to be closely considered by both Scottish Government and NHS Scotland, alongside broader national and international evidence. As part of this, officials and senior clinicians from the Scottish Government and NHS Scotland have also met with Dr Cass and members of the Cass Review team to discuss respective approaches.
Our Strategic Action Framework for NHS gender identity service improvement includes a commitment to support the establishment of nationally commissioned Young Person’s Gender Identity Service. Discussions and scoping with NHS National Services Scotland and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, to consider current and future national provision, are ongoing.