- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 19 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many food crime cases were referred to the Procurator Fiscal by Food Standards Scotland in each financial year, from 2020-21 to date.
Answer
In 2020 3 cases were referred to the Procurator Fiscal by Food Standards Scotland and one in each year for 2021,2022, 2023 and 2024. In four of the cases the principal charge was reported as culpable and reckless conduct, a serious crime at common law in exposing others, and the public in general, to a significant risk to life or health. Two other cases reported were reported by FSS over the relevant period, but have not been included in the statistics as they relate to animal welfare offences which do not fall within the definition of food crime.
- Asked by: Rachael Hamilton, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 06 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 19 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what communication it has had with local authorities regarding its review of the guidance on mothballing, and whether it has advised any local authorities to pause any mothballing proposals until they receive updated guidance from it.
Answer
Statutory responsibility for decisions about the learning estate, including mothballing, rest with local authorities. The Scottish Government issues guidance to support local authorities’ implementation of their statutory responsibilities.
As the First Minister stated on 24 April, we are reviewing current guidance on the mothballing of schools and nurseries to provide greater clarity on whether it is an appropriate action to take. Scottish Government officials have regular engagement with local authorities and their representative bodies on a range of issues, including mothballing, and Ministers are considering a range of local government and stakeholder views on mothballing through the review process.
We will update Parliament further on this work in due course. While the review is underway, the existing guidance on mothballing (which is included in the Statutory Guidance on the Schools Consultation (Scotland) Act 200) remains in place.
- Asked by: Rachael Hamilton, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 06 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 19 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government when it plans to publish the outcome of its review of the guidance on mothballing.
Answer
Statutory responsibility for decisions about the learning estate, including mothballing, rest with local authorities. The Scottish Government issues guidance to support local authorities’ implementation of their statutory responsibilities.
As the First Minister stated on 24 April, we are reviewing current guidance on the mothballing of schools and nurseries to provide greater clarity on whether it is an appropriate action to take. Scottish Government officials have regular engagement with local authorities and their representative bodies on a range of issues, including mothballing, and Ministers are considering a range of local government and stakeholder views on mothballing through the review process.
We will update Parliament further on this work in due course. While the review is underway, the existing guidance on mothballing (which is included in the Statutory Guidance on the Schools Consultation (Scotland) Act 200) remains in place.
- Asked by: Beatrice Wishart, MSP for Shetland Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 06 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 19 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the letter from the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health to Rt Hon Alistair Carmichael MP on 14 April 2025, which states that a pathway for the diagnosis and management of postural tachycardia syndrome has been withdrawn pending a review, when it expects the review process to conclude.
Answer
This is a matter for NHS National Services Scotland, which established the national Long Covid Strategic Network and requested that Health Improvement Scotland perform the evidence review.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 19 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, whether it will provide the (a) office seating capacity and (b) annual running cost of each building (i) 4 Atlantic Quay (Glasgow), (ii) 5 Atlantic Quay (Glasgow), (iii) Bothwell House (Hamilton), (iv) Cadzow Court (Hamilton), (v) Compass House (Dundee), (vi) Denholm House (Livingston), (vii) Alexander Fleming House (Elgin), (viii) Hadrian House (Falkirk), (ix) Tankerness Lane (Kirkwall), (x) Longman House (Inverness) (xi) Marine Scotland (Eyemouth), (xii) Marine Scotland (Peterhead) and (xiii) St Andrews House (Edinburgh).
Answer
The information requested is set out in the following table:
Office | Seating capacity | Annual running cost (2024-25) |
4 Atlantic Quay (Glasgow) 1 | 670 | £51,465.41 |
5 Atlantic Quay (Glasgow) | 764 | £1,507,095.13 |
Bothwell House (Hamilton) 2 | 12 | £13,708.11 |
Cadzow Court (Hamilton) | 32 | £38,310.42 |
Compass House (Dundee) | 22 | £19,121.78 |
Denholm House (Livingston) | 124 | £95,660.21 |
Alexander Fleming House (Elgin) | 23 | £50,462.25 |
Hadrian House (Falkirk) | 36 | £38,435.06 |
Tankerness Lane (Kirkwall) | 26 | £51,360.40 |
Longman House (Inverness) | 148 | £127,877.81 |
Marine Scotland (Eyemouth) | 2 | £13,984.23 |
Marine Scotland (Peterhead) | 20 | £42,493.61 |
St Andrews House (Edinburgh) | 1775 | £1,601,075.15 |
1 – Office closed July 2024
2 – Office closed May 2025
The figures in the Annual running cost (2024-25) column take account of the following:
Facilities Management Hard Services fixed contract costs
Facilities Management Soft Services fixed contract costs
Utilities
- Asked by: Pam Duncan-Glancy, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 19 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government who will be invited to the data summit on additional support for learning, as announced in its Programme for Government 2025-26.
Answer
The Scottish Government will hold a data summit with all local authorities in Scotland on Additional Support for Learning focused on recommending actions for improving consistency of identification, support and reporting of children’s needs at a local level.
Invitations will be extended to all local authorities, COSLA, and other relevant stakeholders to ensure broad engagement across the sector.
- Asked by: Pam Gosal, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 16 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what the total amount is that has been spent to date on the For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers case.
Answer
- Asked by: Pam Gosal, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 16 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an outline of the legal advice that it received for the For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers case.
Answer
The content of any legal advice is confidential.
- Asked by: Pam Gosal, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 16 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether any civil servants were involved in any work related to the For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers case.
Answer
Civil servants were involved in work related to For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers as part of their role to support and advise Ministers.
- Asked by: Paul O'Kane, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 29 April 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 16 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has conducted any analysis of the appropriate level of payment for Funeral Support Payment since its introduction in 2019.
Answer
The Funeral Support Payment helps towards funeral costs, it is not intended to cover the full cost of a funeral.
There is a statutory duty to uprate the payment annually in line with inflation, unlike the UK Government equivalent which does not increase annually.
The Scottish Government published the Funeral Support Payment evaluation in July 2022, which found that the payment reduced the need for people to borrow money to arrange a funeral.
We are committed to continually improving Scottish benefits and last year made improvements to the payment, further supporting bereaved people.