- Asked by: Richard Leonard, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Friday, 20 December 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 9 January 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6T-02170 by Fiona Hyslop on 5 November 2024, in relation to the proposed reduction in ticket office opening hours in the evenings on the ScotRail network, what further details it can provide in response to the reported concerns of passengers travelling at night, particularly women, regarding safety and antisocial behaviour.
Answer
The passenger safety, especially women and girls’, is one of the Scottish Government’s priorities. The Scottish Government expects that, once ScotRail’s plans have been implemented, the improved staff visibility and ScotRail having ability to deploy staff more flexibly will not only improve feeling of safety for all passengers, including women and girls, but also maintain an environment, which helps to deter any potential anti-social behaviour.
- Asked by: Richard Leonard, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Friday, 20 December 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 9 January 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6T-02170 by Fiona Hyslop on 5 November 2024, in relation to the proposed reduction in ticket office opening hours on the ScotRail network, what further details it can provide in response to the reported concerns of passengers and staff that the proposals will introduce uncertainty about the presence of staff who can provide support and address any antisocial behaviour at stations.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to the question S6W-32071 on 9 January 2025. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers
- Asked by: Katy Clark, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 20 December 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 9 January 2025
To ask the Scottish Government when it expects to complete the due diligence process in connection with the direct award of the Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Services contract before 30 September 2025; what assessment it has made of the cost to taxpayers of the UK Government’s mandatory requirement to refer Scottish Government contracts to the Competition and Markets Authority, since 2022 to date, and when Transport Scotland officials last met with the chair and representatives of the Ferries Communities Board to discuss the Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Services 3 contract.
Answer
We expect to complete the due diligence in Spring 2025, prior to award of the new contract in October 2025.
The costs included in the referral to the CMA are the overall costs of providing ferry services over the coming years, which include the costs of increasing the number of vessels in the fleet, resulting in an increased charter cost to reflect the value of new assets.
Transport Scotland officials met with the Ferries Communities Board on 18 December 2024 to discuss issues related to Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Services 3 contract.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 December 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 9 January 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what the current operating subsidy for the Caledonian Sleeper is, broken down by (a) route and (b) passenger segment.
Answer
The final subsidy for all Caledonian Sleeper services for the financial year 2024-25 will be known when the accounts for this year have been finalised and published.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 December 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 9 January 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it requested any changes to the A96 Corridor Review from earlier drafts.
Answer
As with all projects, Transport Scotland Officials regularly discuss and review draft documents prepared by its technical advisors on an ongoing basis as part of the process to finalise reports prior to seeking Ministerial approval to publish. No changes were made by the Scottish Ministers to the draft outcomes of the A96 Corridor Review that identified an optimal Refined Package of improvements.
The position of the Scottish Government has not changed – the current favoured position is to fully dual the A96, and we are already taking forward the dualling process from Inverness to Nairn, including Nairn Bypass.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 December 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 9 January 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what alternative fuels, such as hydrogen- or battery-powered trains, are being considered as interim solutions for the railway network.
Answer
The Scottish Government is considering all sensible alternative fuel options for the development of the Scottish rail network.
- Asked by: Roz McCall, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 18 December 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Natalie Don-Innes on 9 January 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the 2025-26 Budget statement on 4 December 2024, how it plans to fund third sector organisations through the Children and Young People’s Early Intervention Fund in 2025-26.
Answer
The Scottish Government is committed to delivering vital public services and supporting our third sector but continues to face the most challenging financial situation since devolution.
The 2025-26 draft budget, which will be subject to the approval of the Parliament, included an allocation for the Children, Young People, Families Early Intervention and Adult Learning and Empowering Communities (CYPFEI & ALEC) and Children, Young People, Families and Adult Learners (CYPFAL) third sector funds.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 18 December 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 9 January 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how much has been spent on the Best Start Grant School Age Payment, and how many payments have been made, in each year since the payment was introduced, also broken down by local authority area.
Answer
Social Security Scotland routinely releases information on Best Start Grant and Best Start Foods including the number and value of payments.
Since the introduction of Best Start Grant School Age Payment in June 2019, £34,086,106 has been paid to eligible clients. The following table shows the total number and value of School Age Payments made over each financial years since its introduction:
| | Number of School Age Payments | Value of School Age Payments |
Total | 123,140 | £34,086,106 |
2019-2020 | 17,875 | £4,542,500 |
2020-2021 | 22,570 | £5,743,500 |
2021-2022 | 17,515 | £4,496,130 |
2022-2023 | 21,385 | £5,804,114 |
2023-2024 | 23,235 | £6,923,279 |
2024-2025* | 20,555 | £6,576,583 |
*Note: The 2024-25 financial year only covers data until the end of September 2024.
Further breakdown of payment values by local authority area is available in Table 11 of the latest Best Start Grant and Best Start Foods Official Statistics publication on Social Security Scotland’s statistics webpage: Social Security Scotland - Statistics.
The next forthcoming quarterly Best Start Grant and Best Start Foods publication will be released on 25 February 2025, covering data up to 31 December 2024.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 16 December 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Paul McLennan on 9 January 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what its latest estimate is of what the total cost
will be of remediating buildings in Scotland found to contain unsafe reinforced
aeriated autoclaved concrete (RAAC).
Answer
The Scottish Government does not hold this information centrally. It should be noted that the presence of RAAC does not in of itself mean that a building is unsafe. Further information on RAAC in the Public Sector in Scotland can be found in this report Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) across the public sector in Scotland - gov.scot
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 16 December 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Paul McLennan on 9 January 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how much it estimates will be raised for cladding
remediation through developer contributions.
Answer
The Scottish Government has been clear that it will do what is right and necessary to fix the issue of unsafe cladding fully and from the outset. Developers have a key role to play in the assessment, risk mitigation and remediation of buildings with potentially unsafe cladding. We are working collaboratively with them to ensure a fair and proportionate approach to meeting the costs of cladding remediation.
We shared a draft Developer Remediation Contract on 24 September 2024 with the nine developers who signed the Developer Commitment Letter in 2023. The cost to developers who sign the legally binding contract will depend on how many, if any, buildings with potentially unsafe cladding they have developed, and the scale of remediation or mitigation required for each of those buildings following their assessment. Developers agreeing and signing the legally binding developer remediation contract will be a positive step to ensuring the safety of homeowners and residents in multi residential properties with unsafe cladding.
Additionally, this year’s Programme for Government announced that, subject to the devolution of the necessary powers, the Scottish Government intends to bring forward a Bill to establish a Building Safety Levy in Scotland to support the funding of the cladding remediation programme. As set out in the recent consultation on the Scottish Building Safety Levy, we estimate that this measure would seek to raise £30 million per annum.