- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 13 December 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Natalie Don on 9 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W- 21565 by Natalie Don on 4 October 2023, whether it will publish the outcomes of the research by The Lines Between before the end of 2023.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-23892 on14 December 2024. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers .
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 13 December 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Claire Baker on 9 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body whether it has made any commitments to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals within its functions, and, if so, what commitments it has made.
Answer
One
of our Strategic Change Objectives outlined in the SPCB
Strategic Plan is ‘Adapting for a sustainable future’. This focuses on
reducing our carbon emissions and embedding Sustainable Development thinking
across the parliament.
Our
Sustainable
Development Plan includes work under two key pillars - Climate Change, and
Enhancing Scrutiny. Work in these areas is supported by a third pilar on
engagement and embedding sustainable development thinking.
We
are systematically using the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs) as a framework to help us identify priorities in
our sustainability work, and use this to help evolve our related
training and engagement. This includes a course related to the SDGs and the
role of Parliaments – developed by the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association,
which is available to MSPs, MSP staff and SPCB staff regarding the SDG and the
role of Parliaments.
Within
the SPCB we are mapping Parliament’s strategic goals to the SDGs identifying
the top priorities and the leadership required to embed them into the
organisation. The outcome of this work will help us to shape the Session 7
Strategic Plan. We are publicly committed to being Net Zero Ready by 2038
at the latest and we have created a related Climate Change Adaptation risk
assessment and action plan.
As
part of the Scrutiny pillar, we are delivering the Conveners Group Session 6
strategic priority on climate change and net zero. There are seven areas of
work to strengthen scrutiny of climate change across the Scottish Parliament.
These include reviewing parliamentary processes and procedures, commissioning
research to illustrate how climate change impacts on policy areas across
subject committees and further rolling out of the Sustainable
Development Impact Assessment tool. This is part of the work to develop
a model for parliamentary scrutiny of climate change. This wider work
includes enhancing engagement with diverse research evidence and expertise,
embedding public participation, strengthening connections with strategic
partners and sharing good practice. SPICe is publishing an updated blog on this
work in January 2024.
Our
Sustainable Development Performance Manager and Senior Analyst (Climate Change
Scrutiny) would be delighted to meet with you to discuss more fully our work on
Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals.
- Asked by: Mercedes Villalba, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 13 December 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 9 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the report, Killing to Kill: An Ethical Assessment of “Predator Control” on Scottish Moors, by the Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics.
Answer
There are a range of strongly-held views on wildlife management in Scotland. The Scottish Government takes the view that field sports are an important component of the rural economy. We accept that control of predators is sometimes necessary for the management of field sports businesses, as it is for other land management purposes. Our aim is to ensure that all legal predator control is carried out in a way that is consistent with best practice in animal welfare standards.
There are strict regulations governing the setting of traps in Scotland which must be undertaken in accordance with the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 and the Spring Traps Approval (Scotland) Order 2011. We are strengthening this legal framework through the wildlife Management and Muirburn Bill, which includes provisions for mandatory training and licensing for trap operators. We also intend to bring proposals forward for a complete ban on the use of snares in Scotland during Stage 2 of the Bill, as we believe the use of these devices poses an unacceptable welfare risk to wildlife and domestic pets.
We also increased the penalties for illegal use of traps and snares alongside other wildlife offences in the Animals and Wildlife (Penalties, Protections and Powers) (Scotland) Act 2020.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 December 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 9 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to improve the accessibility of ovarian cancer surgery, in light of reports from women who have had to travel to England for treatment.
Answer
I refer the member to the response to question S6W-23824 on 9 January 2024. Improvement action has also been progressed in other areas of Scotland.
Any arrangements for NHS patients to be treated at an Independent Sector hospital would need to be made between the patient, NHS Board and their clinical team.
While a patient has the right, at any time, to exercise choice and seek private treatment, there can never be the expectation that the NHS will pay for it. The reimbursement of any costs incurred when a patient opts for private treatment is a matter for consideration by the local Health Board.
All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers .
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 December 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 9 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of (a) waiting times for neurology services and (b) possible strategies to address any backlogs.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-23817 on 8 January 2024. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 18 December 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 9 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide a breakdown by local authority of the number of inspections carried out in relation to licensing of (a) animal welfare establishments and (b) organisations engaged in rehoming activities under the Animal Welfare (Licensing of Activities Involving Animals) (Scotland) Regulations 2021, and how many such licences have been issued.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not hold this information. Local authorities are responsible for enforcing the Animal Welfare (Licensing of Activities Involving Animals) (Scotland) Regulations 2021 and accordingly they undertake inspections and issue licences.
Information on the number of inspections undertaken and licences issued related to animal welfare establishments and organisations engaged in rehoming activities may be requested from individual councils.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 15 December 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 9 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will revise the Scottish Transport Appraisal Guidance (STAG) model for future rail infrastructure investment, in light of patronage projections for the reopening of Stow, Galashiels and Tweedbank stations on the Borders Railway reportedly having been underestimated for the first year of opening by, respectively, 313%, 330% and 681%.
Answer
Transport Scotland keeps forecasting methodology under review to ensure best practice. The Borders Railway business case demand forecasts were based on modelling that was informed by surveys of residents regarding their potential use of the line. This resulted in forecasts that underestimated demand from Borders stations and overestimated demand from Midlothian stations.
Rail demand forecasting has developed considerably since the demand forecasts for the Borders Railway business case were first developed in 2008. A post-opening hindcast from the South East Scotland Transport Partnership (SESTran) Regional model for those Borders stations gave forecasts within 30% of actual demand. Where available, Transport Scotland recommends to promotors the use of Regional models for new station demand forecasts .
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 15 December 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 9 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of Public Health Scotland data confirming that the percentage of frontline NHS spend allocated to mental health services was 8.78% in 2021-22, whether it is still on track to meet its commitment to allocate 10% of NHS spend to mental health services by the end of the current parliamentary session.
Answer
We continue to work towards delivery of the commitment that at least 10% of frontline health spending will be dedicated to mental health by the end of this parliamentary session.
The NHS Recovery Plan 2021-2026 Annual Progress Update published in December 2023 confirmed that NHS expenditure on mental health rose from £1.25bn in 2020-21 to £1.3bn in 2021-22, an increase of £51.5m or 4.1% - representing 8.8% of total NHS expenditure.
- Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Cunninghame North, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 14 December 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 9 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-22009 by
Michael Matheson on 11 October 2023, in light of its intention to "empower and
support NHS leadership in the use of these new technologies, to help build and
share a wider knowledge base, rather than appointing a single AI champion", how
it plans to overcome any differing governance protocols across NHS boards in
this context, and what its position is on whether not having a single
artificial intelligence (AI) champion for all NHS boards will (a) inhibit
innovation and (b) lead to the (i) delayed adoption and (ii) increased cost of
new AI technologies.
Answer
At its heart, AI is the leveraging of advanced digital technology using large data sets, and we are treating AI with the same rigour as any other new technology or innovation. As such, its use comes under existing digital and data governance mechanisms. At a national level, the Scottish Government, with its partners COSLA, have established a new Strategic Leadership Board for Digital and Data Transformation.
This Leadership Board is supported by a number of sub-boards, including a dedicated Data Board for Health & Social Care. Through this new national governance, we will continue to work towards embedding greater use of digital and data driven innovations across health and social care (including ensuring necessary support is in place for skills and training), consider what capabilities, processes and procedures are required at a local level to support adoption and therefore assess what additional mechanisms may be required nationally.
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 December 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 9 January 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-23295 by Mairi McAllan on 11 December 2023, whether the allocation of funding from the Water Environment Fund for measures to remove invasive non-native species is no longer being reviewed on an annual basis.
Answer
Each year the Scottish Government provides the Scottish Environment Protection Agency with a grant from the Water Environment Fund (WEF) to support work to deliver our River Basin Management Plan. The projects this supports is reviewed on an annual basis to ensure funding through WEF is targeted on projects which will derive the greatest benefit to Scotland’s rivers and neighbouring communities.
Currently, alternative funding streams for projects to remove Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) in Scotland enable more effective use of resource and provide greater benefits for biodiversity. Subsequently, WEF funding is at the moment prioritising restoring rivers and improving fish migration.
For more information on funding for INNS, I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-23295 on 11 December 2023. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers .