- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 17 June 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 5 July 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to expand coverage of designated renal social work support.
Answer
Employment of social workers rests with local authorities and the Scottish Government does not hold any information on numbers of renal social workers.
- Asked by: Foysol Choudhury, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 17 June 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 5 July 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of psychosocial support for people with chronic kidney disease.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-28205 on 5 July 2024. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 June 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 5 July 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what the cost of supporting the Pain Management Task Force has been since it started meetings in June 2022, including a breakdown of any payments for (a) workers, (b) secondments, (c) members, (d) travel costs, (e) IT and (f) other expenses.
Answer
There have been no costs specifically incurred in supporting the Pain Management Task Force and associated Short Life Working Groups for either the 2022-23, 2023-24 or 2024-25 financial years, beyond the pay of NHS staff and civil servants undertaking this work as a part of their role.
- Asked by: Pauline McNeill, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 June 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 5 July 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what it is doing to assist Glasgow Airport in increasing passenger numbers.
Answer
The Scottish Government has always recognised the importance of Scotland’s international connectivity and we are committed to working with all Scotland’s airports to help grow international connectivity.
Our International Strategy, published earlier this year, makes reference to that commitment and our overall ambition is for Scotland to be at least as well connected as peer nations.
Transport Scotland, along with VisitScotland and Scottish Development International, works to help Scotland’s airports grow international connectivity and secure new routes that are essential for inbound tourism, business connectivity and the economy as a whole. This includes work to grow our connectivity to the US and Canada given the importance of these links for business, exports and tourism. That role is a complementary one with each airport competing on their own merits for new routes and capacity.
Representatives from the Scottish Government recently took part in the route development forum Routes Europe 2024, meeting with a number of airlines to discuss future opportunities and promote Scotland as a market that can sustain more direct connectivity. We also have regular engagement with airlines to discuss future opportunities to further develop Scotland’s connectivity to North America. These discussions are commercially sensitive and I am unable to share specific details.
- Asked by: Pauline McNeill, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 June 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 5 July 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what it is doing to help Glasgow Airport to secure the return of transatlantic flights.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-28273 on 5 July 2024. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers .
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 June 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 5 July 2024
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason it has not published the report for the 2021 missed emissions target under section 36 of the Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009, during the pre-election period, in light of reports that this report has already been substantially delayed and is critical to understanding how the Scottish Government plans to learn from its failures in order to reach its net zero targets.
Answer
The published pre-election guidance sets out that announcements and publications from the Scottish Government, particularly those including a cross border or reserved element, can have a bearing on the UK general election campaign. Regrettably, in line with the guidance applying during the pre-election period, a decision was made not to publish this report as planned ahead of the Scottish Parliament entering summer recess on 29 June. We are committed to discharge this report as soon as reasonably practicable once the Scottish Parliament has reconvened after summer recess.
Our commitment to ending Scotland’s contribution to global emissions as soon as possible, and by 2045 at the latest, is unwavering and work to take forward this report remains a priority.
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 18 June 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 5 July 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide a breakdown of the outstanding medium-term Cleaner Air for Scotland 2 (CAFS2) recommendations that are not due to be completed until after 2024, as listed in the Cleaner Air for Scotland 2 - Towards a Better Place for Everyone: 2023/24 Progress Report, including for what reason they are outstanding in each case.
Answer
The Scottish Government published the annual Cleaner Air for Scotland 2 progress report on 17 June 2024, providing an update on progress on delivering the actions.
Of the twenty medium term actions, the timeframe for completing three of these actions has been extended beyond 2024. The reasons for this are as follows.
Action | Reason for extending |
The Scottish Government will support investigation into the method of assessing risk of significant harmful ecological effects from atmospheric nitrogen (nitrogen deposition and elevated concentrations of ammonia and NOx), comparing critical loads/levels with dose-response or other options. | Commissioned research under our Strategic Research Programme will deliver a number of the CAFS2 actions by 2026. The James Hutton Institute are leading on the Nitrogen Impacts on the Natural Environment (NINE) project which will deliver the outcomes of these two actions by 2026. |
The Scottish Government with support from SEPA and NatureScot will assess the potential costs of implementing identified improvements to the current site condition monitoring of designated conservation sites, to improve on current methods which don't detect air pollution effects. |
Public bodies should incorporate travel from employee commutesas part of their corporate carbon footprint and will report these emissions via their public bodies duties reporting. | This action is being taken forward through new statutory guidance on public bodies’ climate change duties and climate change reporting which is due to be published in 2025. |
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 June 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 5 July 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide a breakdown of the cost to the public of producing the report, Scottish Government Pain Management Panel: Report on Phase 2 of engagement with the panel, regarding chronic pain information compiled by The Lines Between, which was the private firm commissioned by the Scottish Government.
Answer
In summer 2022, the Lines Between were commissioned to recruit, support and engage a diverse cross-section of people with chronic pain across Scotland to establish a Pain Management Panel to help inform the Pain Management Implementation Plan. The total cost of the contract with The Lines Between was £40,000 exclusive of VAT. The cost of formatting the report for publication on the Scottish Government website was £516.58.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 20 June 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 5 July 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what the cost was of setting up the Pain Management Task Force prior to it commencing meetings in June 2022, including a breakdown of any payments for (a) workers, (b) secondments, (c) members, (d) travel costs, (e) IT and (f) other expenses.
Answer
There were no costs incurred in setting up the Pain Management Task Force prior to meetings commencing in June 2022, beyond the pay of NHS staff and civil servants undertaking this work as a part of their role.
- Asked by: Gordon MacDonald, MSP for Edinburgh Pentlands, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 04 July 2024
-
Current Status:
Initiated by the Scottish Government.
Answered by Shona Robison on 5 July 2024
To ask the Scottish Government when it will publish its response to the Scottish Local Authority Remuneration Commission report on councillor pay.
Answer
The Scottish Government has today published its response to the SLARC report and it is available at : https://www.gov.scot/isbn/9781836014898 .