- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 October 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 26 October 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what steps it will take to ensure that the issues highlighted in the 2013 UK Parliamentary Inquiry into Abortion on the Grounds of Disability and, in particular, its finding that many parents are steered towards abortion and feel that they do not receive adequate information regarding other options, are not exacerbated by the introduction of cell-free DNA non-invasive prenatal testing techniques.
Answer
All pregnant women in Scotland are already offered a screening test for Down’s syndrome. If the screening test shows that the chance of having a baby with Down’s is high, women then have the option of having an invasive diagnostic test. The proposed change recommended by the UK National Screening Committee (UKNSC) is for Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) to be offered to women who are deemed at higher risk following the current primary screen. NIPT is not diagnostic and an invasive diagnostic test will still be required to receive a definitive diagnosis.
For women who choose to have NIPT, this will add in an extra step in the screening programme. The impact of this, and the choices women make at different points in the pathway, is something that the UKNSC hope to gain a better understanding of through further research. A recommendation has therefore been made to evaluate the introduction of NIPT to Down’s syndrome screening. This will include scientific, ethical and user input to better understand the impact on women, their partners and the screening programme around the offer of NIPT or invasive testing following screening.
The Scottish Government is fully committed to ensuring that pregnant women in Scotland have access to high quality, safe and effective screening services and the Scottish Screening Committee is now looking at the use of NIPT as an additional screening test for Down’s syndrome in Scotland.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 02 October 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 26 October 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what legislation governs access arrangements for people who are accompanied by assistance dogs, and whether it plans to amend this.
Answer
The Equality Act 2010 states that it is unlawful for a service provider to discriminate against a disabled person by direct or indirect discrimination, discrimination arising from a disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment, discrimination by association, victimisation or discriminatory advertisements. This legislation would prohibit discriminatory access arrangements.
The Scottish Government has no plans to seek amendments to the Equality Act 2010.
There are also specific pieces of legislation related to the licensing of taxis and private hire cars as covered in the answer to S5W-11728 on 25 October 2017. Further, the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh Regulations 1989 (SI 1989/830) exempt guide dogs from the general prohibition on taking animals into any of the four Royal Botanic Gardens.
All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 October 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 25 October 2017
To ask the Scottish Government how many places have been available on nursing training courses in each year since 2007, broken down by institution, and how many were taken up.
Answer
Table 1, a copy of which has been placed in SPICE (Bib 59239) highlights data from NHS Education Scotland and Scottish Funding Council showing both the recommended and actual intakes to pre-registration nursing and midwifery programmes, broken down by institution from 2007 to 2015. Figures for 2016 have not been published yet.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 October 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 25 October 2017
To ask the Scottish Government how many ground E terminations have been performed under the Abortion Act 1967 in each year since 1999, and what information it has on records in previous years.
Answer
The number of ground E terminations performed under the Abortion Act 1967 in each year since 1999 are presented in Table 1.
Grounds for abortion have been recorded on the ISD Abortion database since 1991. Data are included on previous years in the annual termination of pregnancy report, with some tables showing data going back to 1968. For example, data from 1968 are available on all terminations by gestational age and by age of woman.
Table 1. Number of Ground E terminations in Scotland from 1999 to 2016.
Year
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
|
Number
146
154
141
144
172
190
148
183
168
160
154
148
136
164
153
185
191
214
|
Source: Notifications (to the Chief Medical Officer for Scotland) of abortions performed under the Abortion Act 1967, ISD Scotland Ref: IR2017-01604
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 02 October 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 25 October 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to reports that some taxi and minicab operators do not allow assistance dogs in their vehicles.
Answer
As a Government we are committed to promoting and protecting equality and human rights for disabled people enabling them to participate in and to make a full contribution to daily and public life, and we recognise the vital role which assistance dogs, including guide dogs, play in helping disabled people with practical tasks and in providing emotional support and independence.
Within Scotland taxis and private hire cars are licensed by Licensing Authorities (local authorities) under the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982. The licences of both taxis and private hire cars should contain a prescribed condition that requires the driver to a) permit assistance dogs (as defined by The Taxi Drivers’ Licences (Carrying of Guide Dogs and Hearing Dogs) (Scotland) Regulation 2003), to accompany the disabled person on any journey and, b) not to make an additional charge for this. However a Notice of Exemption can be issued by the local authority to the driver, if there are medical grounds as to why the driver should be exempted from complying with this condition. Such notices should be displayed clearly on the vehicle so that potential customers can see this.
Where a customer has a complaint this should be directed to the local Licensing Authority, made up of locally elected councillors, who can seek a review of the licence.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 September 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 25 October 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on flash glucose monitoring systems being available in the NHS; what assessment it has made of the number of (a) children and (b) adults who may benefit from them being available in the NHS, and when it expects this will happen.
Answer
The Scottish Government notes the announcement by Abbott of the decision to include the Freestyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system on the England and Wales drug tariff. NHS Scotland has yet to receive official notification. Once received, NHS Scotland will follow the established due process for consideration of inclusion on the Scottish Drug Tariff.
The Scottish Diabetes Group are reviewing the evidence base on the clinical effectiveness of flash glucose monitors and will advise on its use within Scotland.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 October 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 25 October 2017
To ask the Scottish Government how many terminations after 24-weeks gestation have been performed in each year since the commencement of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.
Answer
The number of terminations after 24 weeks gestation (gestations of 24 weeks and over) from 1990 is displayed in Table 1.
The number of terminations of pregnancy in some individual years is very small. Disclosure control measures have been applied because of the sensitive nature of the data and also to reduce the risk of disclosing personally identifiable information.
Table1. Number of terminations of pregnancy performed after 24 weeks gestation, in Scotland, from 1990 to 2016.
Year
1990-1992
1993-1995
1996-1998
1999-2001
2002-2004
2005-2007
2008-2010
2011-2013
2014-2016
|
Number
20
20
15
20
19
13
22
24
37
|
Source: Notifications (to the Chief Medical Officer for Scotland) of abortions performed under the Abortion Act 1967, ISD Scotland.
Ref: IR2017-01603
Notes
Abortions in Scotland are carried out under the terms of the Abortion Act 1967. Doctors have a legal requirement to notify the Chief Medical Officer in Scotland of all abortions carried out in Scotland. Section 37(1)(d) of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 refers to those abortions performed under Ground E of the Abortion Act, that is, there is substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped.
ISD Statistical Disclosure Control Policy is available at the following link: http://www.isdscotland.org/About-ISD/Confidentiality/disclosure_protocol_v3.pdf.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 October 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 25 October 2017
To ask the Scottish Government how many ground E abortions relating to cases of "serious handicap", the term used in the Abortion Act 1967, there were in each year between 2005 and 2015, broken down by (a) diagnosed condition and (b) gestational week of pregnancy.
Answer
The number of ground E abortions between 2005 and 2015 by (a) diagnosed condition and (b) gestational age is available in the following tables 1a and 1b.
Statistical disclosure control has been applied to both tables because of the sensitive nature of the data and to reduce the risk of disclosing personally identifiable information.
ISD Statistical Disclosure Control Policy is available at the following link: http://www.isdscotland.org/About-ISD/Confidentiality/disclosure_protocol_v3.pdf.
Table 1a
Number of ground E abortions by diagnosed condition (1); 2005 - 2015
Ground E diagnosis
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All ground E
|
148
|
183
|
168
|
160
|
154
|
148
|
136
|
164
|
153
|
185
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The nervous system:
|
30
|
36
|
40
|
41
|
50
|
44
|
27
|
44
|
38
|
46
|
33
|
Anencephaly
|
8
|
16
|
15
|
14
|
16
|
18
|
9
|
15
|
8
|
16
|
10
|
Encephalocele
|
5
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
7
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
8
|
*
|
*
|
Hydrocephalus
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
9
|
7
|
*
|
5
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
Other malformations of the brain
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
6
|
*
|
8
|
*
|
8
|
11
|
6
|
6
|
Spina bifida
|
11
|
9
|
11
|
7
|
*
|
8
|
10
|
9
|
6
|
11
|
6
|
Other
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
6
|
9
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
7
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other congenital malformations:
|
37
|
32
|
24
|
34
|
31
|
40
|
33
|
42
|
29
|
46
|
47
|
Cardiovascular system
|
8
|
9
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
9
|
9
|
*
|
*
|
13
|
Respiratory system
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
Urinary system
|
*
|
*
|
5
|
5
|
6
|
9
|
*
|
*
|
7
|
7
|
12
|
Musculoskeletal system
|
11
|
7
|
5
|
12
|
10
|
10
|
11
|
13
|
5
|
10
|
12
|
Other
|
10
|
10
|
9
|
12
|
8
|
13
|
9
|
14
|
12
|
17
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chromosomal abnormalities:
|
45
|
74
|
65
|
66
|
51
|
38
|
48
|
56
|
53
|
76
|
80
|
Down’s syndrome
|
30
|
41
|
37
|
29
|
27
|
23
|
33
|
30
|
30
|
48
|
47
|
Edwards’ syndrome
|
9
|
17
|
10
|
11
|
13
|
8
|
8
|
9
|
13
|
16
|
19
|
Patau’s syndrome
|
*
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
5
|
*
|
6
|
*
|
Other
|
*
|
10
|
13
|
20
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
12
|
*
|
6
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other:
|
36
|
41
|
39
|
19
|
22
|
26
|
28
|
22
|
33
|
17
|
31
|
Fetus affected by maternal factors
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
Hydrops fetalis not due to haemolytic disease
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
5
|
7
|
*
|
7
|
*
|
*
|
Family history of heritable disorder
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
Multiple gestation
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
Other
|
30
|
35
|
30
|
14
|
16
|
18
|
18
|
17
|
24
|
12
|
29
|
* Indicates values that have been suppressed due to the potential risk of disclosure.
1 ICD10 codes:
|
|
Nervous system
|
|
Q00
|
anencephaly
|
Q01
|
encephalocele
|
Q03
|
hydrocephalus
|
Q04
|
other malformations of the brain
|
Q05
|
spina bifida
|
Q02,Q06, Q07
|
other
|
|
|
Other congenital malformations
|
|
Q20-Q28
|
the cardiovascular system
|
Q30-Q34
|
the respiratory system
|
Q60-Q64
|
the urinary system
|
Q65-Q79
|
the musculoskeletal system
|
Q10-Q18, Q35-Q56, Q80-Q89
|
other
|
|
|
Chromosomal abnormalities
|
|
Q90
|
Down’s syndrome
|
Q910-Q913
|
Edwards’ syndrome
|
Q914-Q917
|
Patau’s syndrome
|
Q92-Q99
|
other
|
|
|
Other conditions
|
|
P00-P04
|
fetus affected by maternal factors
|
P832-P833
|
hydrops fetalis not due to haemolytic disease
|
Z80-Z84
|
family history of heritable disorder
|
O30
|
multiple gestation
|
Table 1b
Number of ground E abortions by gestational age; 2005 - 2015
Gestation (weeks)
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
12 & under
|
17
|
30
|
32
|
29
|
24
|
30
|
22
|
30
|
21
|
29
|
26
|
13-14
|
22
|
33
|
26
|
28
|
29
|
24
|
29
|
38
|
41
|
43
|
50
|
15-16
|
16
|
27
|
16
|
16
|
23
|
13
|
15
|
16
|
27
|
24
|
29
|
17-18
|
25
|
33
|
44
|
37
|
21
|
26
|
18
|
12
|
14
|
27
|
24
|
19-20
|
36
|
31
|
32
|
23
|
32
|
22
|
22
|
25
|
17
|
19
|
26
|
21-22
|
22
|
21
|
13
|
14
|
13
|
26
|
24
|
27
|
20
|
29
|
23
|
23 & over
|
10
|
8
|
5
|
13
|
12
|
7
|
6
|
16
|
13
|
14
|
13
|
Source: Notifications (to the Chief Medical Officer for Scotland) of abortions performed under the Abortion Act 1967, ISD Scotland
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 02 October 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 20 October 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to ensure that people who are accompanied by assistance dogs can access (a) transport, (b) cultural venues and (c) other services, such as shopping facilities.
Answer
Assistance dogs should be accepted on all modes of travel, subject to one exception in the case of taxis and private hire cars for drivers with a medical exception certificate. Our Accessible Travel Framework commits us to take forward a number of work packages to improve accessibility. Transport Scotland is now actively supporting partners – disabled people’s organisations, transport providers and government – in this co-production process. Part of the work of the Framework involves ensuring training for transport staff about disability awareness is high-quality and this includes how to support people with assistance dogs.
VisitScotland works very closely with the Assistance Dog charities Canine Partners, Hearing Dogs for Deaf People and Guide Dogs Scotland, all of which are represented on the VisitScotland Accessible Tourism Steering group. VisitScotland is working with the Scottish Government to discuss a number of complaint cases concerning assistance dogs refused access to bars, hotels and restaurants. VisitScotland published a booklet on their web-site www.visitscotland.org/accessibletourism called "Take the Lead" which gives very clear advice and states that by law access should be granted except in exceptional circumstances. This booklet is distributed widely and it is also sent to those businesses who are the subject of an access complaint.
The Equality Act 2010 states that it is unlawful for a service provider to discriminate against a disabled person by direct or indirect discrimination, discrimination arising from a disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment, discrimination by association, victimisation or discriminatory advertisements. This legislation prohibits discriminatory access arrangements. The Equality and Human Rights Commission is the regulatory body responsible for enforcing the Equality Act 2010.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 26 September 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 9 October 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what plans it has to extend funding for the provision of formula milk and feeding equipment to mothers with HIV.
Answer
Providing formula milk to HIV-positive mothers is a form of HIV-prevention which lies within the remit of NHS health boards. Some boards do this in co-operation with third sector partners such as Waverley Care. Health Boards meet expenses for such measures from their Outcomes Framework allocation. The amount of spending on this would vary per board according to the local needs and circumstances. BHIVA guidelines are followed by Scottish healthcare professionals and boards at their professional discretion.