- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 2 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how many trees have been cut down or removed in order to make way for onshore windfarm development in the last 10 years, broken down by project and year.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-14793 on 2 March 2023. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 28 February 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-12922 by Jenny Gilruth on 21 December 2022, which states that it expects "an update from Transport Scotland on this matter imminently", whether the update has now been produced, and, if so, whether it will provide a revised answer to the question.
Answer
I can confirm that I have now received the update from Transport Scotland that Network Rail, who is delivering the project, has confirmed that a planned milestone was missed as the internal consultation with other Network Rail operational colleagues took longer than anticipated to arrive at a single option. However, this has no bearing on the overall project programme.
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 1 March 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the potential impact of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service capital budget for 2023-24 on the amount of maintenance work required in court buildings across the country.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 1 March 2023
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 21 February 2023
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to a report by WWF Scotland that states that Scotland will fall "significantly short" of its target for decarbonising heating in homes.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 21 February 2023
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 15 February 2023
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 23 February 2023
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on the Rural Housing Fund.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 23 February 2023
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 25 January 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 7 February 2023
To ask the Scottish Government when the next Climate Justice Fund independent evaluation will be conducted and concluded, and whether it will include analysis of (a) the £2 million loss and damage funding announced around COP26 and (b) the £5 million loss and damage funding announced at COP27.
Answer
The next evaluation is planned for the end of the current funding cycle (to March 31 2026) and will include all funding that has been allocated from within the Climate Justice Fund. The evaluation will cover whether or not the funding has achieved it’s strategic objectives, and whether the Fund as a whole is continuing to demonstrate best practice in delivering climate justice against the three pillars of justice that were adopted following the previous evaluation.
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 16 January 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 7 February 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-10553 by Jenny Gilruth on 20 September 2022, what the ScotRail budget for Rail Passenger Services (a) is for 2023 and (b) was in each of the years set out in the answer; how much of the budget remained unspent at the end of each of those years, or, if there was an overspend, how much the overspend was, and from which budget line any overspend was funded.
Answer
The draft budget for rail passenger services for (a) 2023-24 is £458 million, as published in December and remains subject to the Parliamentary approval process.
The following table sets out (b) budget against expenditure and explanations for variances that are included in the published outturn statements within the Scottish Government consolidated accounts each year.
Year | Budget £m | Expenditure £m | Comments |
2016-17 | 266 | 266 | No variance |
2017-18 | 311 | 170 | The underspend is offset by an overspend on the capital budget and relates to the reclassification of Fixed Track Access Charges expenditure. |
2018-19 | 183 | 155 | The underspend is offset by an overspend on the capital budget and relates to the reclassification of Fixed Track Access Charges expenditure. |
2019-20 | 150 | 180 | The overspend is due to increased revenue support in response to COVID-19 that was agreed to be funded within the wider SG budget. |
2020-21 | 659 | 659 | No variance |
2021-22 | 568 | 534 | The underspend is due to higher than expected fare box revenue that reduced requirement for COVID-19 support. |
2022-23 | 431 | | Full year not complete. No overspend is expected at this time. |
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 26 January 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 7 February 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-13828 by Michael Matheson on 24 January 2023, whether it will provide the information requested regarding whether it consulted (a) Wood Mackenzie (b) Rystad and (c) Westwood Global Energy as part of the development of its Draft Energy Strategy and Just Transition Plan, which was published on 10 January 2023.
Answer
The Scottish Government drew on data from Wood Mackenzie and other organisations in developing the draft Energy Strategy and Just Transition Plan.
As we committed to in the Bute House Agreement, the Scottish Government is undertaking in-depth analysis work to better understand Scotland’s energy requirements as we transition to net zero, ensuring an approach that supports and protects our energy security and our highly skilled workforce whilst meeting our climate obligations.
This work has already provided evidence which was used to underpin elements of the draft Energy Strategy and Just Transition Plan relating to the oil and gas sector, together with other commercially available data.
The independent report on the analytical work we have commissioned will be published in full, once it is complete and following independent panel review. We expect publication during the consultation period for the draft ESJTP.
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 25 January 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 7 February 2023
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-13349 by Mairi McAllan on 10 January 2023, whether it is the case that it can now confirm how much funding will be allocated to the Climate Justice Fund in financial year 2023-24, and, if it is not the case, whether it will provide a draft figure, prior to final budget allocations being made, of how it expects to allocate for this purpose.
Answer
I can confirm that budget for the Climate Justice Fund is currently expected to be £6m for Financial Year 2023-24 subject to parliamentary approval of the budget.
- Asked by: Liam Kerr, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 25 January 2023
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 7 February 2023
To ask the Scottish Government how it decided that allocating (a) £2 million and (b) the later amount of £5 million to the Climate Justice Fund was the "right" amount to allocate, and what pre-existing strategy it was following, or outcomes or targets it was aiming to achieve.
Answer
The Climate Justice Fund aims to support communities facing the impacts of climate change under a justice-based approach. The decision to allocate £2m of it to address loss and damage was based on the scale of the need, the lack of funding from others, and the influence the additional funding would have on other governments and organisations to commit funding to address loss and damage.
The £2 million for loss and damage aims to increase ambition and accelerate global action and to influence the global agenda on the issues of loss and damage and climate justice. It has funded the programs outline in the response to question
S6W-13351 on 10 January 2023 .
An additional £5 million on loss and damage was subsequently allocated on the basis that the initial £2m was effectively supporting communities (based on feedback from global stakeholders and evidence from ongoing quarterly monitoring of the programmes) and that a specific allocation on non-economic loss and damage would both support vulnerable communities and bring focus to an area that was under-researched and under-funded. The need for more to be done to both understand and address non-economic losses and damages, in particular as experience by women, was one of the key insights from the Scottish Government hosted October 2022 loss and damage conference as well as from ongoing consultations with our partners.
The £7 million on loss and damage does not meet the scale of the global need. But it does allow the funding of pilot projects that support communities and the building of an evidence base of what works that will strengthen both Scottish Government’s and global partners’ future work. It has also played a role in unlocking funding commitments from other governments and organisations. While Scotland was the first country to commit funding to loss and damage, the global commitments to fund loss and damage have grown to over $300m.
All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers