- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 17 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government how many requests for re-determinations for Best Start Grant pregnancy and baby payments have been (a) made and (b) processed, and how many have resulted in a determination that (i) was the same and (ii) differed from the initial determination.
Answer
Official statistics, covering the first months of applications for the Best Start Grant, will be published in April 2019. More detailed analysis will be published in a quarterly publication series starting from August 2019. In line with the Code of Practice for Statistics, care will be taken to ensure that these publications are produced to a level of quality that meets users’ needs. Published data will be subject to disclosure control methods to protect the confidentiality of the data. There will be scope to analyse redeterminations made, processed and the outcomes, if we are satisfied with the quality of the data and can safeguard the confidentiality of individuals.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 16 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, whether the information in the article, “Make Friends With Benefits”, which was published in The Scottish Sun on 7 January 2019, which stated that “in the last two months nearly 200 people have already had a combined £103,230 boost after calling the [Financial Health Check service] helpline” is accurate and, if so, whether this information was provided by (a) it or (b) Citizens Advice Scotland.
Answer
This information was provided by Citizens Advice Scotland. Performance information on the Financial Health Check Service will be submitted to the Scottish Government on a quarterly basis. We have not yet received the first performance report.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 16 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government further to the answer to question S5W-20745, by Aileen Campbell on 15 January 2019, how it defines (a) a successful and (b) an unsuccessful evaluation.
Answer
The target set for the service is to deliver a Financial Health Check to 15,000 households in Scotland per annum. We will monitor the quarterly update reports provided by Citizens Advice Scotland to gauge whether the service is successful. Our decision will be based on the data submitted for the following agreed key performance indicators:
Number of clients accessing the service
Profile of clients
Client financial gain
Client satisfaction
Client financial confidence
Improved mental health as a result of the check.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to questions S5W-20555, S5W-20556 and S5W-20558 by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 8 January 2019, whether its statement that the policy “is a fully reserved benefit the Scottish Government has have no control over and cannot change” refers to the two-child benefit cap in particular or universal credit generally, and whether it considers that the statement reflects its powers over universal credit flexibilities or to top up reserved benefits.
Answer
The Scottish Government has very limited administrative flexibilities over Universal Credit. These are laid out in the Scotland Act 2016, giving Scottish Ministers the power to change when and to whom Universal Credit is paid, and to vary the amount of housing costs included in the award. We have used these to good effect by introducing the Universal Credit Scottish choices. This does not, however, change the fact that Universal Credit remains reserved to the UK Government and with it the two child limit policy which we do not have the power to remove.
Having top up powers doesn’t mean we can change the benefit. The two child limit and rape clause will remain in place because these are the policy choices the UK Government has made and it is only right that they are the ones to take action to fix this.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20558 by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 8 January 2019, whether it will provide the information that was requested regarding what alternatives to accessing DWP data it has considered in order to mitigate the two-child benefit cap, and for what reason it did not provide this information in its answer.
Answer
The two child limit is a UK Government policy which the Scottish Government has repeatedly called for to be scrapped. The changes announced by the UK Government last week show that it too now finally accepts that the policy is unfair. It should therefore scrap the cap for all families.
The Scottish Government plans to spend over £125m in 2018-19 mitigating the impact of UK Government welfare cuts and on measures to help protect people on low incomes. In 2020/21 UK Government cuts including the two child cap are expected to take around £3.7 billion out of the Scottish welfare system- with £92m in 2020-21 due to the two child limit and the Scottish Government cannot be expected to continually mitigate to fill that gap.
It is the policy of the Scottish Government to continue to call for the two child limit to be scrapped for all families. The Scottish Government would not request information from the DWP on mitigation as this is not an SG policy.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 17 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20835 by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 16 January 2019, whether any of the senior responsible officers have stated that they would wish to be consulted before recipients of the review share all or parts of its contents with others, and, if so, for which reviews.
Answer
The reviews are confidential to the Senior Responsible Owner.
Any request for copies of the review are directed to the Senior Responsible Owner.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 16 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20757, by Aileen Campbell on 15 January 2019, whether it will provide the information that was requested regarding what procurement process was conducted for the provision of its Financial Health Check service.
Answer
The service was not procured. It is grant funded.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20555 by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 8 January 2019, whether it will provide the information that was requested regarding what (a) discussions it has had with and (b) information it has sought from the UK Government regarding mitigation of the two-child benefit cap, and for what reason it did not provide this information in its answer.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S5W-20880 on 24 January 2019. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx .
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 11 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 23 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government how many items listed in the Social Security Programme Board Dashboard, which forms the basis of the Social Security Programme Board Programme Director Progress Report, released under FoI/18/02096, were given a red RAG status, and what these red RAG status items were.
Answer
Programme Board Dashboards are part of routine reporting, and as such any RAG statuses are provided for internal discussion and not made public, on the grounds that doing so would inhibit substantially the free and frank exchange of views for the purposes of deliberation. The Programme Director’s Update is used to enable critical discussion that in turn supports the delivery of social security for Scotland.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 17 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20404 by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 20 December 2018, what the estimated risk is of Social Security Scotland being the target of fraud and organised crime beyond matters of public protection.
Answer
Our assessment of the risk posed to Social Security Scotland by Serious and Organised Crime Groups takes place on an ongoing basis, and we have been consulting with experts and relevant organisations to understand these risks and to design responsive control measures. Further detail relating to this assessment is highly sensitive and cannot be shared in the public domain, however the agency’s Counter Fraud Strategy published in September 2018 outlines at high level the methods employed to adequately assess and mitigate the risk of fraud perpetrated by both internal and external threat actors, including that posed by Serious and Organised Crime Groups.