- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 4 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-16303 by John Swinney on 9 May 2018, whether it will provide the same information for 2018.
Answer
a) Number of pupils with additional support needs (ASN) by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) deciles, 2014-2018.
SIMD Decile 1 | Year |
2014 3 | 2015 3 | 2016 3 | 2017 | 2018 |
1 = Most deprivation | 22,612 | 23,462 | 26,132 | 27,197 | 30,868 |
2 | 16,871 | 18,314 | 22,802 | 24,232 | 26,320 |
3 | 14,551 | 16,107 | 19,075 | 20,923 | 22,719 |
4 | 14,932 | 16,316 | 17,816 | 19,107 | 20,537 |
5 | 13,615 | 14,778 | 16,143 | 17,554 | 18,947 |
6 | 12,981 | 14,562 | 15,294 | 16,348 | 17,391 |
7 | 13,247 | 15,000 | 15,035 | 16,399 | 17,508 |
8 | 12,229 | 13,590 | 14,088 | 15,484 | 16,492 |
9 | 10,580 | 11,547 | 13,286 | 14,504 | 15,597 |
10 = Least deprivation | 7,810 | 8,497 | 10,372 | 11,352 | 12,327 |
No SIMD Data 2 | 1,073 | 970 | 399 | 391 | 359 |
1. SIMD 2012 deciles are used for 2014 and 2015, and SIMD 2016 deciles are used for 2016-2018. |
2. Includes all pupils at Grant Aided special schools and a number of pupils at local authority schools for whom no SIMD data was available. Pupils at Grant Aided special schools were not included in this row in the answer to S5W-16303. |
3. The total number of pupils with an ASN differs slightly to published figures for 2014-2016 due to corrections made to Grant Aided special school pupil numbers. |
4. The total number of pupils with an ASN differs slightly to that reported in the answer to question S5W-16303 as pupils at Grant Aided special schools have been included with those with no SIMD data in this answer. |
b) Percetange of pupils with additional support needs (ASN) by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) decile, 2014-2018.
SIMD Decile 1 | Year |
2014 3 | 2015 3 | 2016 3 | 2017 | 2018 |
1 = Most deprivation | 16.09 | 15.32 | 15.33 | 14.82 | 15.51 |
2 | 12.01 | 11.96 | 13.38 | 13.21 | 13.22 |
3 | 10.36 | 10.52 | 11.19 | 11.40 | 11.41 |
4 | 10.63 | 10.65 | 10.45 | 10.41 | 10.32 |
5 | 9.69 | 9.65 | 9.47 | 9.57 | 9.52 |
6 | 9.24 | 9.51 | 8.97 | 8.91 | 8.74 |
7 | 9.43 | 9.79 | 8.82 | 8.94 | 8.80 |
8 | 8.70 | 8.87 | 8.27 | 8.44 | 8.28 |
9 | 7.53 | 7.54 | 7.80 | 7.90 | 7.84 |
10 = Least deprivation | 5.56 | 5.55 | 6.09 | 6.19 | 6.19 |
No SIMD Data 2 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.18 |
1. SIMD12 deciles are used for 2014 and 2015, and SIMD16 deciles are used for 2016-2018. |
2. Includes all pupils at Grant Aided special schools and a number of pupils at local authority schools for whom no SIMD data was available. Pupils at Grant Aided special schools were not included in this row in the answer to S5W-16303. |
3. The total number of pupils with an ASN differs slightly to published figures for 2014-2016 due to corrections made to Grant Aided special school pupil numbers. |
4. Percentages may differ slightly to those in the answer to question S5W-16303 as pupils at Grant Aided special schools have been included with those with no SIMD data. This affects the total number of pupils with ASN used to calculate these figures. |
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 4 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20295 by Jeane Freeman on 21 December 2018, how many missed NHS appointments there were in 2018-19.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not currently hold information on the number of missed appointments during 2018-19. This information will be published later this year and will be available at: https://www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/Hospital-Care/Publications/
The number of Did Not Attends (DNA) for new outpatient appointments in Scotland between April 2018 to December 2018 (inclusive) was 83,332.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 4 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government (a) how many and (b) what percentage of pupils with a co-ordinated support plan there have been in each of the last five years, broken down by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) decile.
Answer
a) Number of pupils with a Co-ordinated Support Plan (CSP) by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) decile, 2014-2018.
SIMD Decile 1 | Year |
2014 3 | 2015 3 | 2016 3 | 2017 | 2018 |
1 = Most deprivation | 358 | 308 | 237 | 220 | 204 |
2 | 290 | 242 | 230 | 204 | 185 |
3 | 311 | 281 | 242 | 214 | 217 |
4 | 306 | 282 | 255 | 236 | 220 |
5 | 309 | 276 | 236 | 249 | 229 |
6 | 360 | 296 | 254 | 235 | 191 |
7 | 320 | 283 | 236 | 220 | 199 |
8 | 280 | 260 | 208 | 193 | 166 |
9 | 269 | 228 | 207 | 181 | 170 |
10 = Least deprivation | 227 | 180 | 210 | 191 | 165 |
No SIMD Data 2 | 83 | 61 | 45 | 39 | 40 |
1. SIMD 2012 deciles are used for 2014 and 2015, and SIMD 2016 deciles are used for 2016-2018. |
2. Includes all pupils with CSPs at Grant Aided special schools and a number of pupils with CSPs at local authority schools for whom no SIMD data was available. |
3. The total number of pupils with a CSP differs slightly to published figures for 2014-2016 due to corrections made to Grant Aided special school pupil numbers. |
b) Percentage of pupils with a Co-ordinated Support Plan (CSP) by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) decile, 2014-2018.
SIMD Decile 1 | Year |
2014 3 | 2015 3 | 2016 3 | 2017 | 2018 |
1 = Most deprivation | 11.50 | 11.42 | 10.04 | 10.08 | 10.27 |
2 | 9.32 | 8.97 | 9.75 | 9.35 | 9.32 |
3 | 9.99 | 10.42 | 10.25 | 9.81 | 10.93 |
4 | 9.83 | 10.46 | 10.81 | 10.82 | 11.08 |
5 | 9.93 | 10.23 | 10.00 | 11.41 | 11.53 |
6 | 11.56 | 10.98 | 10.76 | 10.77 | 9.62 |
7 | 10.28 | 10.49 | 10.00 | 10.08 | 10.02 |
8 | 8.99 | 9.64 | 8.81 | 8.85 | 8.36 |
9 | 8.64 | 8.45 | 8.77 | 8.30 | 8.56 |
10 = Least deprivation | 7.29 | 6.67 | 8.90 | 8.75 | 8.31 |
No SIMD Data 2 | 2.67 | 2.26 | 1.91 | 1.79 | 2.01 |
1. SIMD12 deciles are used for 2014 and 2015, and SIMD16 deciles are used for 2016-2018. |
2. Includes all pupils with CSPs at Grant Aided special schools and a number of pupils with CSPs at local authority schools for whom no SIMD data was available. |
3. The total number of pupils with a CSP differs slightly to published figures for 2014-2016 due to corrections made to Grant Aided special school pupil numbers. |
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 30 May 2019
To ask the Scottish Government what the purpose is of the review of the clinical decision support system; whether it will publish the review's criteria; what questions are being asked in the review, and which clinicians are in the review team.
Answer
A review is currently being scoped to provide due diligence over the consideration of the business case for a National Decision Support Platform. I will be happy to update the member on the outcome of the review once it is concluded.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 30 May 2019
To ask the Scottish Government how it will measure the clinical impact of the decision to delay the proposed new clinical decision support system.
Answer
No decision has yet been taken about the future business case for a National Decision Support Platform. A review is being scoped to consider all the implications involved with proceeding including alignment with the National Digital Platform, key projects that are dependent on a National Decision Support Platform, benefits (including clinical), and financial sustainability.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 30 May 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of it being an open standards solution, for what reason it is halting work on implementing the proposed new clinical decision support system.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to S5W-23295 on 30 May 2019. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx .
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 30 May 2019
To ask the Scottish Government whether delaying the proposed new clinical decision support system will lead to radiology breaking away from the national project and, if so, what the impact of this will be.
Answer
The national clinical decision support (CDS) discovery project has considered how a national proposal to CDS Platform might benefit clinical decision across NHS services. Radiology has been part of that project. SG officials have recently met with representatives of the Scottish Radiology Transformation Project (SRTP) CDS steering group to discuss key interdependencies and associated risks between a proposed National Decision Support Platform and the radiology project providing CDS to that speciality. Radiology colleagues are considering future options for the STRP and an SG decision on a national platform is due over the Summer.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Joe FitzPatrick on 29 May 2019
To ask the Scottish Government what the patient access criteria will be for fertility preservation and storage for medical reasons, and how these criteria will ensure equity of access.
Answer
A sub-group of the National Infertility Group has been working on developing guidelines and pathways, including patient access criteria, for fertility preservation and storage for medical reasons. This work is ongoing and the group expects to report to the National Infertility Group over the summer to consider next steps.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Clare Haughey on 29 May 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-23058 by Clare Haughey on 16 May 2019, whether the assertion that "very few people who access mental health care and treatment are ever treated against their will" is supported by data collected by the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland.
Answer
Around 1 in 4 people are likely to be affected by mental illness at some point in their lives. Most people who use mental health services receive treatment do so without being subject to an order or certificate under the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003. Mental health law in Scotland is based on rights and principles and offers patients significant safeguards where compulsory treatment is necessary.
Data collected by the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland pertains to those who are receiving care and treatment subject to orders under the 2003 Act. Even where someone is subject to an order under mental health legislation, they may still give their consent to treatment.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Joe FitzPatrick on 23 May 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to questions S5W-22908 and S5W-22909 by Joe FitzPatrick on 8 May 2019, whether it plans to carry out a similar review of the screening programme in Scotland to assess whether any improvements can be made.
Answer
The Scottish Government commissioned a Review of Screening in 2017 to examine the management and overall delivery of the six national screening programmes in Scotland to improve resilience, effectiveness and efficiency, and to ensure that screening services are ready to address future priorities and challenges.
The Review recognises the scale and complexity of the challenges around national screening programmes, and made a total of 23 recommendations. Ministers have accepted the Review in full and work is underway to develop an implementation plan for these recommendations.
The review report will be available from the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe) reference 60693.