- Asked by: Douglas Ross, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 March 2017
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 15 March 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to claims that return patients who require regular treatment are not counted in chronic pain waiting times, and what action it is taking to address the reported excessive delays that some face before receiving treatment.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 15 March 2017
- Asked by: Douglas Ross, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 March 2017
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 9 March 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of ambulance provision in the Moray area.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 9 March 2017
- Asked by: Douglas Ross, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 February 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 1 March 2017
To ask the Scottish Government when it last met the Scottish Police Authority and what issues were discussed.
Answer
I met the Chair of the Scottish Police Authority on Wednesday 22 February 2017 when we discussed matters of SPA business.
- Asked by: Douglas Ross, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 07 February 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 1 March 2017
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of reports regarding Police Scotland’s Vulnerable Persons Database, whether it considers one in 14 people in Scotland to be vulnerable.
Answer
The criteria for recording individuals on the interim Vulnerable Persons Database is an operational matter for Police Scotland. I understand that individuals are only recorded on the database if they are considered to be subjects of concern at the point of contact with the police.
- Asked by: Douglas Ross, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 07 February 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 28 February 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what oversight it has regarding the sharing of details on the Police Scotland Vulnerable Persons Database with other agencies.
Answer
The sharing of information contained within the interim Vulnerable Persons Database is an operational matter for Police Scotland. Police Scotland is required to comply with the Data Protection Act 1998 and all other relevant legislation.
- Asked by: Douglas Ross, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 07 February 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 28 February 2017
To ask the Scottish Government which public bodies have access to the Police Scotland Vulnerable Persons Database.
Answer
This is an operational matter for Police Scotland as owner of the interim Vulnerable Persons Database.
- Asked by: Douglas Ross, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 27 February 2017
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 28 February 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on the consultation document, Policing 2026: Our 10 year strategy for policing in Scotland.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 28 February 2017
- Asked by: Douglas Ross, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 February 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 24 February 2017
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-05946 by Michael Matheson on 1 February 2017, in light of the comment that it "allocates funding directly to NHS Boards as part of their overall funding allocations", whether the amount given to Police Scotland was reduced when this funding was allocated to the NHS boards.
Answer
From 1 April 2014, the budget for the provision of healthcare and forensic services for people in police care transferred from the Police Scotland budget within the Justice Directorate to the Health and Social Care Directorate budget and was subsequently allocated to NHS Boards.
- Asked by: Douglas Ross, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 February 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by James Wolffe QC on 16 February 2017
To ask the Scottish Government whether it was alerted by the Lord Advocate prior to the 2017-18 Draft Budget that the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service would need to lose around 200 posts from its current workforce to deliver the required real terms savings over the next five years.
Answer
There is no plan to reduce the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service’s workforce by 200. The Workforce Planning Strategy, which is a matter for the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service rather than the Scottish Government, sets out, in line with the recommendations of Audit Scotland, a possible model for the future beyond 2017-18 but no decisions have yet been taken about staffing beyond that point. Future decisions about staffing will depend on what budgets are set in subsequent years, the numbers and types of cases reported to the Service, and progress with reform in the operation of the criminal justice system. The Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service budget has only been set for one year (2017-18) and the expected impact of that budget on staffing levels has been shared publicly with the Justice Committee and with staff.
- Asked by: Douglas Ross, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 February 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by James Wolffe QC on 16 February 2017
To ask the Scottish Government when it was made aware of the contents of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service’s Workforce Planning Strategy, which was reportedly published on 30 January 2017.
Answer
The Workforce Planning Strategy is a matter for the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, not the Scottish Government, and was made available to all parties for the first time when published on 30 January 2017.