- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 23 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive what explanation it has for any delays by previous governments in implementing an agreed compensation scheme for people participating in clinical trials of blood products, such as factor VIII.
Answer
The involvement of patients in clinical trials took place around the introduction of the Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service (SNBTS) heat-treated Factor VIII product in 1987. Papers already released include correspondence in relation to eligibility for compensation for patients taking part in clinical trials. Although there were concerns expressed by clinicians about compensation arrangements, these issues were resolved and did not delay the introduction of a heat-treated Factor VIII product which was safe in terms of the transmission of hepatitis C.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 23 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will make renewed contact with all women who are at risk of having contracted blood-borne viruses from Anti-D immunoglobulin.
Answer
The Scottish Executive is not aware of any evidence which suggests that women in Scotland have contracted blood-borne viruses from anti-D immunoglobulin. It is, therefore, not necessary to make contact with women who have received this product.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 23 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether ministers have read and directly reviewed all the papers and evidence from primary sources in their consideration and judgement on the need for an independent public inquiry into the infection of patients contracting hepatitis C from contaminated blood products.
Answer
Ministers have fully considered all the relevant information and issues.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 09 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 22 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body, further to the answer to question S2O-8978 by Kenny McAskill on 1 February 2006, why no specific mechanism exists to monitor the income, service levels, costs, level of subsidy and value for money of the Members’ Restaurant as distinct from other catering outlets at the Parliament and whether it will change its practice in this respect.
Answer
The income from the Members’ Restaurant is recorded separately from the other catering outlets. As I indicated in the answer to question S2O-8978, some costs are generic. For example, some roles cover all areas: general manager, executive chef, accountant, kitchen porters and other roles such as food service assistants are often located by demand. It would be extremely difficult accurately to split costs amongst all catering outlets. We have no current plans to make major changes and subsidy is likely to continue to be presented as a total for all catering outlets.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 09 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 22 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body whether it will give access to the currently named Members’ Restaurant to all pass holders every day of the week.
Answer
Access to the Members' Restaurant was re-considered by SPCB in November 2004, and it was agreed that the members and their guests only rule, on business days, would continue. It was also agreed that all pass holders could access the bar at any time. The SPCB has no current plans to change the access arrangements.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 09 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 22 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body whether it will ensure that the Members’ Restaurant does not receive disproportionate subsidies relative to other catering outlets in the Parliament.
Answer
Future subsidy will be determined by usage, service level and tariff policy. It is not possible to ensure that the catering outlets operate at the same subsidy level, as usage is one of the main factors and can vary from week to week. While the SPCB will keep the catering policy under review, we have no current plans to make major changes and the total subsidy level across all catering outlets will continue broadly at the same level.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 09 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 22 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body whether it will consider making the Members’ Restaurant accessible to the public.
Answer
As the Members' Restaurant is within the private part of the building, it would not be possible, within the current security arrangements, to give the public unescorted access. Members can of course invite guests into the Members’ Restaurant but non-pass holders must be accompanied by a pass holder at all times in the private area.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 20 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive how many patients have been admitted into the care of the NHS following the development of complications arising from treatment, procedures or care provided by private health care providers.
Answer
Information on the numbers of patients admitted to NHS hospitals due to complications in treatment received in the independent sector is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 20 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will reconsider its policies in respect of contracting the private sector to provide clinical care.
Answer
The Scottish Executive will not be reconsidering its policies at present in respect of contracting with the independent sector to provide clinical care. Thousands of patients across Scotland have benefited already from our use of the independent sector, and we have been able to use the extra capacity provided to drive down waiting times across Scotland. However, we expect the same high standards for our patients wherever they are treated. It is for NHS boards to satisfy themselves that, in contracting with an independent sector provider, appropriate governance and monitoring arrangements are in place.
- Asked by: Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Socialist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 20 February 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive what plans the Executive has to review all contracts with private health care providers, in light of reports of infections following cataract surgery carried out by the Advanced Centre for Eye Care under contract to NHS Glasgow in The Herald on 31 January 2006.
Answer
The Scottish Executive has no such plans. Explicit guidance has been issued to NHS boards underlining their responsibilities to ensure services provided to NHS patients by the independent health care sector meet the quality standards that apply in the NHS in Scotland. It is for NHS boards to satisfy themselves, in contracting with an independent sector provider, that appropriate governance and monitoring arrangements are in place.