- Asked by: Tavish Scott, MSP for Shetland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 January 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 14 January 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what assessment was made of the volume and nature of current and future effluent discharges into Lerwick Harbour from Scottish Water and private outfall pipes prior to the decision to withdraw Lerwick's status as a high natural dispersion area.
Answer
An assessment of high natural dispersion area (HNDA) status was made based on recommendations from the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) on a comprehensive study undertaken by North of Scotland Water, which included analysis of morphology, hydrology and specific hydraulic conditions in Lerwick Harbour, and on SEPA's monitoring of discharges into Lerwick Harbour. This review was required under the terms of the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive (91/271/EEC), which seeks to protect the environment from adverse effects of such discharges.
- Asked by: Tavish Scott, MSP for Shetland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 January 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 14 January 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what the basis was of its assessment of the morphology, hydrology and hydraulic conditions in Lerwick Harbour that lead to the withdrawal of Lerwick's status as a high natural dispersion area.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-32925 today. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.
- Asked by: Tavish Scott, MSP for Shetland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 06 January 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 14 January 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what the extent was of the water quality sampling that was carried out prior to the decision to withdraw Lerwick's status as a high natural dispersion area and what the sampling results were.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-32925 today. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.
- Asked by: Tavish Scott, MSP for Shetland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 January 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 9 January 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive when it last met representatives of fishermen and what subjects were discussed.
Answer
I last met representatives of the Scottish Fishermen's Federation on 23 December, to discuss the outcomes from last December's Council of Ministers. Discussions between the Executive and industry continue.
- Asked by: Tavish Scott, MSP for Shetland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Des McNulty on 7 January 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what the five most common reasons are for rejecting applications under its central heating installation programme and to what percentage of rejected applications each such reason applies.
Answer
There are only four common reasons for refusing applications under the central heating programme from owner-occupiers and private renters. Because the applicant already has full or partial central heating. Because the applicant has not lived at the address for at least one year, in which case they are advised to re-apply after a full year's residence. Because the applicant is a local authority or housing association tenant, in which case they are told to apply to their landlord. Because the applicant is aged under 60, in which case they are advised to re-apply when they, or their spouse, if any, is 60. Eaga do not regularly collect statistics on the number of applications which are rejected for one or more of these reasons.
- Asked by: Tavish Scott, MSP for Shetland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Des McNulty on 7 January 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive further to the answer to question S1W-27257 by Hugh Henry on 31 July 2002, what the average length of time between receipt of an application and completion of installation has been under its central heating installation programme in each postcode area.
Answer
The average length of time between the events described is currently 170 days. This figure is an all-Scotland average. A breakdown by postcode area is not available.
- Asked by: Tavish Scott, MSP for Shetland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 10 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 24 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will make representations to Her Majesty's Government on action that could be taken to combat the illegal smuggling of wildlife through ports in the light of the report by the World Wide Fund for Nature which identified the ports in Lerwick and Greenock as being in the top 10 wildlife smuggling ports in the UK.
Answer
The control of illegal trade in wildlife imported into the UK is implemented and enforced by the UK Government through the Control of Trade in Endangered Species (Enforcement) Regulations 1997 which set down the police powers, offences and penalties for breaches of the legislation.The Scottish Executive appreciates the concerns expressed by the WWF and the Trade Records Analysis of Flora and Fauna in Commerce (TRAFFIC) in highlighting potential weaknesses in the efforts of Government and its agencies in their efforts to combat illegal trade in wildlife. The Executive is in regular contact with the UK Government on all aspects of wildlife crime through its membership of the Partnership for Action Against Wildlife Crime (PAW), which includes key Departments of the UK Government, the Police and other enforcement agencies.The Executive's commitment to tackling the illegal international wildlife trade is clearly demonstrated through its funding in April this year of a two-year secondment of an intelligence officer to the UK's National Wildlife Crime Unit, based at the National Criminal Intelligence Service in London.The specific issues relating to the level of illegal smuggling of wildlife through Scottish ports referred to in the WWF report will be raised by the Executive's representative on the PAW Steering Group when it next meets in January 2003.
- Asked by: Tavish Scott, MSP for Shetland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 10 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 24 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it plans to take action to increase the powers of the courts to tackle the illegal smuggling of wildlife into the country in the light of the report by the World Wide Fund for Nature which identified the ports in Lerwick and Greenock as being in the top 10 wildlife smuggling ports in the UK.
Answer
There are no immediate plans to take such action. The WWF report has only just been received and we will be giving consideration to its findings and recommendations in due course.
- Asked by: Tavish Scott, MSP for Shetland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 November 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 19 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-31549 by Lewis Macdonald on 26 November 2002, why it has no plans to undertake an assessment of the impact of Crown Estate seabed rentals for subsea cables on the laying of (a) power cables needed to harness renewable energy resources and (b) fibre optic telecommunications cables needed to provide fast information and communication technologies connections to the islands.
Answer
The Scottish Executive has no specific devolved functions which would require or justify an assessment of the impact of any specific elements of the operational costs of laying power or telecommunications cables, such as Crown Estate rentals and royalties. The Executive would, nevertheless, consider any evidence that clearly demonstrated that strategies to promote renewable energy or telecommunications were jeopardised unreasonably by such costs.
- Asked by: Tavish Scott, MSP for Shetland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 19 December 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive who will be responsible for reviewing the performance of the partners to be appointed to help deliver Scottish Water's capital investment programme.
Answer
The appointment and monitoring of partners to deliver Scottish Waters investment program is an operational matter for Scottish Water. The Water Industry Commissioner will monitor the performance of Scottish Water against these targets.