- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 12 August 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 7 September 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what steps have been taken to recover the costs incurred in supervising Steven Beech from the UK authorities; what costs were incurred during his time in Scotland, and what steps have been taken to review the arrangements between the Scottish and UK authorities in such cases.
Answer
The arrangements, which are in place between the Scottish and UK authorities to protect the public, work on a reciprocal basis. However, at the time of his arrival in Aberdeen in March 2002, Mr Beech’s legal status was such that there was no formal statutory requirement for supervision on the part of any UK jurisdiction and as a UK citizen he was at liberty to reside anywhere within the UK. The question of recovery of costs did not therefore arise.
As a result of the extent and nature of his previous criminal record and the assessment of his risk, the decision was then taken to put in place with immediate effect an intensive monitoring and support package. The Scottish Executive agreed to meet the costs of the supervision package under Section 27 of the Social Work (Scotland) Act 1968. The principal components of this funding package were the accommodation costs incurred by Aberdeen City Council and the 24 hours supervision services provided by SACRO on behalf of the authority. The cost of these services was as follows.
| Year | Amount |
| 2001-02 | £18,888.23 |
| 2002-03 | £318,982.59 |
| 2003-04 | £99,949.53 |
| Total | £437,820.35 |
In addition, Grampian Police incurred costs of £7,238.16.
The funding issues involved in this type of case are fortunately rare and require to be considered on a case by case basis to ensure appropriate resources are in place to maintain community safety. It is considered that overall these provisions work well and there presently are no plans to review the arrangements.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 01 August 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 5 September 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has made any estimate of the potential contribution of hydro power towards meeting energy needs and, if so, what the estimated contribution is.
Answer
Hydro electricity currently accounts for around 8% of all electricity generated in Scotland.
Scotland's Renewable Energy Potential: Realising the 2020 Target, published by the Forum for Renewable Energy Development in Scotland on 20 June 2005, indicated that the scope for additional hydro schemes could amount to as much as 200MW. The report is available from the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (Bib. number 36765).
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 12 August 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 2 September 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what sanctions are in place to be applied against those who do not remove ragwort and other dangerous weeds from their land.
Answer
Occupiers of land do not commit an offence by having ragwort and other weeds listed in the Weeds Act 1959 on their land. An occupier who unreasonably fails to comply with a notice served under Section 1 of the Weeds Act 1959 is committing an offence and may, on summary conviction, be liable to a fine not exceeding level 3 of the standard scale.
Where an occupier fails to comply with a notice, the Weeds Act 1959 also empowers Scottish ministers to take control action and recover the costs of this action from the occupier of the land.
Local authorities have powers under Section 179 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 to serve notice requiring occupiers to deal with any land whose condition is adversely affecting the amenity of other land in their district. If the occupier fails to comply with the notice, the planning authority may take control action and recover the costs of the action.
Section 1 of the Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 places a general duty on local authorities to maintain local roads and verges, including controlling ragwort. Where ragwort is apparent on trunk road verges, embankments or central reserves, the Trunk Roads Maintenance Contracts require the operating companies, BEAR Scotland Ltd and Amey Highways Ltd, to control it by undertaking treatment, including hand pulling operations. The services and performance of these companies is monitored by an independent Performance Audit Group, appointed by the Executive. Appropriate action will be taken by the Executive if the requirements of the contract with regard to weed control are not met.
It is an offence to plant or otherwise cause to grow in the wild certain invasive non-native plants including Giant Hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum). Penalties on summary conviction include imprisonment for up to six months and/or a fine not exceeding £40,000. Local authorities may also take action where invasive non-native plants such as Giant Hogweed present a risk to public health and constitute a statutory nuisance.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 12 August 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 2 September 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how many complaints have been made in relation to the Weeds Act 1959 in each of the last ten years.
Answer
The number of complaints made in relation to the Weeds Act 1959 to the Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department’s Area Offices in each of the last ten years is shown in the following table. A complaint may relate to more than one site.
| Year | Number of Complaints Received | Number of Sites Complained About |
| 2005, as at 24 August | 88 | 125 |
| 2004 | 41 | 56 |
| 2003 | 51 | 50 |
| 2002 | 51 | 74 |
| 2001 | 45 | 45 |
| 2000 | 42 | 38 |
| 1999 | 36 | 36* |
| 1998 | 41 | 41* |
| 1997 | 27 | 27* |
| 1996 | 24 | 24* |
Note: *For 1999 and earlier years, it is not known whether complaints included more than one site.
Data for 2005 are complaints received by 24 August. Data for previous years include all complaints about injurious weeds received during the full calendar year.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 12 August 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 2 September 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how many public prosecutions have been brought under the Weeds Act 1959 in each of the last ten years.
Answer
It has not been necessary to bring any prosecutions under the Weeds Act 1959 in any of the last ten years.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 17 August 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 1 September 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what steps it is taking to protect the interests of the Scottish beef industry, in light of a decision by major supermarket chains to import cheap beef from overseas.
Answer
Beef imports into the EUfrom third countries are subject to the arrangements of the EU’s beef regime.This includes a system of import tariffs and a number of concessionary importquotas. The UK plays an active part in the negotiations of thesearrangements, for example in the case of EU/Mercosur (the South Americantrading group) and in the forthcoming WTO talks. I am well aware of industryconcerns and these will be taken into account in framing the overallnegotiating position.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 17 August 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 1 September 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive to what extent it considers that a decision by major supermarket chains to import cheap beef from overseas poses a threat to the Scottish beef industry.
Answer
Procurement decisions are commercialmatters for individual supermarkets. In this case, the Scottish beef industry hasa richly deserved reputation for quality and the Scottish Executive supports thework of Quality Meat Scotland (QMS) in seeking to ensure that consumers always havethe choice of buying Scotch beef.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 08 August 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 1 September 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what energy costs have been incurred by each (a) of its agencies, (b) police force, (c) fire authority and (d) local authority, broken down by fuel category, in (i) each of the last three years and (ii) the current year to date, showing also year-on-year percentage changes and what projections have been made in respect of each body’s energy costs for 2005-06.
Answer
The information requested isnot held centrally.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 July 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 1 September 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how many times the First Minister has written to the Prime Minister since November 2001 and what topics were raised.
Answer
The First Minister and PrimeMinister are in regular contact through a number of means. They write to each otherwhere that is required. Information on the number of times the First Minister haswritten to the Prime Minister since November 2001, and on what subject, is not readilyavailable and could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 July 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 1 September 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how many times the First Minister has had an official private meeting with the Prime Minister since November 2001.
Answer
The First Minister and the PrimeMinister have met 11 times on Government business since November 2001. They alsomeet regularly on political business.