- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 August 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 2 September 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will provide a breakdown by prison of the figures contained in the table in Appendix 6 of the Scottish Prison Service Annual Report and Accounts 2002-03.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron,Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is asfollows:
The information requested in relation tobreaches of discipline and punishments in the year 2002-03 broken down byestablishments is provided in tables available in the Parliament's ReferenceCentre (Bib. number 28942).
There is a typographical error inAppendix 6 of the Annual Report with the numbers “disobeying a rule orregulation” being incorrectly repeated under “disobeying a lawful order”. Thecorrect figures are shown in the table and are also contained in the tablesprovided to the Parliament’s Reference Centre.
| Disobeying a lawful order | 571 | 8,579 | 252 | 687 | 823 | 9,266 |
| Disobeying a rule or regulation | 130 | 288 | 26 | 69 | 156 | 357 |
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 August 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 September 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-33964 by Mr Jim Wallace on 24 February 2003, whether the maximum limit of 5% of contract price for performance revenue deduction, as referred to in the second paragraph of Schedule F to the Minute of Agreement between the Secretary of State for Scotland and Kilmarnock Prison Services Limited for the Design, Construction, Management and Financing of a Prison at Kilmarnock, has been applied in the first two quarters of 2003.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron,Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is asfollows:
| Year | Quarter | Maximum Limit Applied (as at 21/08/03) |
| 4 | 4 | Yes |
| 5 | 1 | No |
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 August 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 19 August 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answers to questions S1W-25983 and S1W-32815 by Mr Jim Wallace on 29 May 2002 and 13 January 2003 respectively, what information it has on the investigation by the police and whether the operators of HM Prison Kilmarnock are likely to accrue performance points in respect of that incident.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:We understand that an Intermediate diet and trial date of 7 October and 18 October 2003 respectively have been set. The question of points will follow the outcome of the trial.
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 04 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 1 August 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-972 by Cathy Jamieson on 5 June 2003, how many nominations the First Minister makes to the Prime Minister to fill the vacant office of (a) Lord President of the Court of Session and (b) Lord Justice Clerk.
Answer
There is no statutory requirement but it is normal practice for the First Minister to offer the Prime Minister a choice of names to fill vacancies for the office of Lord President and Lord Justice Clerk. When appointments were being considered in 2001 the Prime Minister accepted the First Minister's recommended choice of name for each post.
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 04 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 29 July 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-972 by Cathy Jamieson on 5 June 2003, by what process members of the Judicial Appointments Board are appointed and who appoints them.
Answer
The lay members of the board were appointed after public advertisement and interview. Three of the five legal members were also interviewed. The High Court judge was nominated by the Lord President. The Sheriff Principal was nominated by the convener of the Sheriffs principal group. In all cases the First Minister made the appointments.
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 04 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 29 July 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-972 by Cathy Jamieson on 5 June 2003, for what period members of the Judicial Appointment Board are appointed.
Answer
All members of the board, including the chair, were appointed for three years in the first instance.
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 04 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 29 July 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive how much it has paid to Partnerships UK in each year since the foundation of Partnerships UK.
Answer
The following table shows how much the Scottish Executive has paid to Partnerships UK in each year since the foundation of Partnerships UK (PUK).
| Year | Amount (£) | Reason |
| 2002 | 25,270 | Work on development of Scottish schools standard PPP contract |
| 2002 | 15,727 | M74 Motorway - scoping exercise |
| 2003 | 1,762 | Presentation at Scottish Executive's workshop on Scottish Schools standard PPP contract payment mechanism |
| 2003 | 21,136 | Drafting work on technical guidance note on scoping of services and in-house involvement in PPPs |
| 2003 | 22,303 | Carrying out key stage reviews on schools projects prior to issue of invitation to negotiate |
| 2003 | 235,000 | Support for development of non profit distributing organisation model and piloting in Argyll and Bute schools (part payment) |
| 2003 | 380,000 | Reimbursement by Scottish Executive of Midlothian Council's fees for PUK for their schools PPP project - PUK paid directly by the council |
| 2003 | 400,000 | Reimbursement by Scottish Executive of East Lothian Council's fees for PUK for their Schools PPP project - PUK paid directly by the council |
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 04 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 29 July 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-972 by Cathy Jamieson on 5 June 2003, what interests members of the Judicial Appointments Board are required to declare and whether any such declaration of interests is available for public examination.
Answer
Members are required to declare any conflict of interest which may affect prejudicially their performance as members of the board. They are also asked to declare any political activity. Members have confirmed that they see no conflicts of interest and that none is involved in political activity. During the selection process for new appointments to the bench individual members of the board withdrew from certain interviews of candidates who are well known to them.
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 04 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 29 July 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-972 by Cathy Jamieson on 5 June 2003, whether it intends to establish the Judicial Appointments Board on a statutory basis.
Answer
Ministers have made clear since the inception of the board that it was their intention to place it on a statutory footing after a period of experience of working administratively. That remains the Executive's policy.
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 04 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 29 July 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive how much it paid for its financial interest in Partnerships UK.
Answer
The Scottish Executive paid £2 million for a 4.4% stake in Partnerships UK in 2001.
