Seòmar agus comataidhean

The review is targeted to be completed by 24 March 2021, ahead of the pre-election period. We and Crown Estate Scotland are prioritising our resources in working to meet this target and to provide the Scottish offshore wind sector with clarity on the way forward.

Scotland is an ideal location for offshore wind, with substantial resources and opportunity for investment. An integral part of ScotWind are the Supply Chain Development Statements that applicants must complete and commit to when applying for a lease option. These statements will provide a transparent explanation of the supply chain content to be included within developments, with a view to maximising local content. Within the bounds of competition law, developers will face penalties if these commitments are not met.

ScotWind follows from our recent Sectoral Marine Plan for Offshore Wind Energy that has identified 15 Plan options, capable of delivering up to 10 GW in Scottish waters.

The ScotWind seabed leasing process is the next step in delivering economic and social benefit to Scotland whilst actively tackling climate change, developing a green recovery from the pandemic and building on our successful blue economy in Scotland.

We will give due consideration to any European Protected Species licence applications that are submitted on the merits of each individual case and taking account of all relevant factors. It would be inappropriate to pre-determine any part of this process.

There is no statutory requirement to undertake a public consultation process for individual EPS licence applications. However, in the spirit of openness and transparency, all EPS licences and applications will be placed in the public domain after a determination has been made alongside the reasons for our decisions.

Marine Scotland has published an information note and FAQs for operators of fish farms on the use of acoustic deterrent devices and the requirement for an EPS licence. This makes clear that reasons such as an increase in cost or inconvenience are not satisfactory reasons for why an alternative measure s has not been considered.

As well as causing direct injury and mortality to farmed fish and damage to cages and nets, the presence of seals close to the cages may cause stress and distress to the fish which may be a welfare concern for fish farm operators. Technical questions regarding net separation and mesh size would need to be assessed on a case by case basis in relation to EPS license applications.

A partnership project between Marine Scotland and Crown Estate Scotland has investigated non-lethal measures to address the problem of seal predation at fish farms, including new netting materials and anti-predator nets. The report considers options available, those requiring further development, and their potential for impacts on non-target species. The report will be published before the end of March 2021.

A licence can only be granted provided that it meets three tests, including that there must be no satisfactory alternative. We will give due consideration to any European Protected Species licence applications that are submitted on the merits of each individual case and taking account of all relevant factors. It would be inappropriate to pre-determine any part of this process.

Aquaculture companies use a range of non-lethal management measures to protect their stock including robust netting material and anti-predator nets. Information detailing the relative use of anti-predator or Seal-Pro nets by Cooke Aquaculture Scotland and the Scottish Salmon Company is provided in answer to S5W-35394 on 10 March 2021. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx .

A European Protected Species licence can only be granted provided that it meets three tests, including that there must be no satisfactory alternative. We will give due consideration to any European Protected Species licence applications that are submitted on the merits of each individual case and taking account of all relevant factors. It would be inappropriate to pre-determine any part of this process.

Only essential retail is able to remain open in an area which is categorised as Level 4. Non-essential retail is open in Level 3 areas and below. An updated list of Essential retailers came into force on the 26 December in regulations that responded to the emergence of a new strain of the virus.

Baby equipment stores are not currently included in the list of essential retail however can operate online and as a permitted collection service.

We consider these restrictions essential in response to the emergence of a new strain of the virus that we have seen spread much faster in parts of the UK, and to minimise longer-term impacts on both public health and our economy.

The Scottish Government has said direct payments made to individual recipients will be capped in the transition period.

Since then we have had to deal with the combined impacts of COVID-19 and Brexit. Faced with these challenges, we decided to prioritise maintaining CAP payments to support the rural economy and the legislation required to ensure the CAP/SRDP could continue in 2021.

Capping is still under active consideration but requires careful work to ensure it does not detrimentally impact the rural economy, there is advance notice of any changes, and that any funding raised is used for clear outcomes that support Scottish Government priorities. The timeframe for this means any decisions will be for the next Parliamentary session.

We are also committed to co-develop new ways of working with our farming and crofting communities through farmer-led groups supported by scientific and economic expertise from SRUC and our main research providers, and will consider the outcomes from these groups in reaching our decisions.

The budget for the Agri-Environment Climate Scheme (AECS) in 2021-22 is a reflection of forecast spend for ongoing existing five year contracts, as well as the contract extensions for agreements that ended in 2020. A further round of AECS was opened in January 2021 to support delivery of a wide range of environmental measures, with a focus on protected areas, organics, management supporting farmland waders, corn buntings and corncrakes, slurry stores and improving public access.

In addition the Agriculture Transformation Fund has provided £16.8m to around 3,500 individual applications for capital machinery that should assist in reducing GHG emissions in the sector and £1.5m for forestry and farm woodland planting, which will help farmers diversify into forestry and fund more small-scale farm woods.

We also announced funding of £20 million in the 2020-21 budget for peatland restoration with a commitment to invest more than £0.25 billion over 10 years to support restoration of 20,000 ha of Scottish peatland annually towards a total of 250,000 hectares by 2030.

All of this funding supplements funding designed to pursue environmental objectives, such as ensuring that in 2019-20, Scotland’s proportion of new woodland creation in the UK was 81%

Scheme and budget decisions must be taken at programme level and reflect the available budget. We have prioritised agri-environment support, but that is made difficult as a result of the decision by the UK Government to cut funding by £170m and their decision to only have a one-year spending review that means there is no legally committed funding agreement beyond 2021-22. The lack of funding guarantees and continued uncertainty means SG must be very careful when entering into multi-annual agreements such as AECS.

The actual area of land continuing under management will be led by the eligibility and quality of applications, the options applied for and the scoring threshold selected for the different elements that provide the greatest benefit for the budget available. We have set a closing date for the end of June, later than normal to allow land managers sufficient time to consider the options and prepare high quality applications. The options identified in the restricted round will cover less land area, but will provide targeted support for continuity of management and protection for Scotland’s most vulnerable habitats and species, along with continuing to support organic farming with its universally accepted benefits for biodiversity and climate change.

We have prioritised agri-environment support in the face of significant cuts to the budget resulting from the UK Government reneging on public commitments that farmers and crofters would not be worse off as a result of leaving the EU. As it stands, Scotland’s farmers and rural communities stand to lose £170 million over the 2021-22 to 2024-25 period as a result of Brexit.

We continue to support farmers, crofters and land managers to play their part in cutting emissions, addressing climate change as well as delivering wider biodiversity and environmental benefits. Currently, a range of CAP schemes including Greening, Agri-Environment Climate Scheme, Beef Efficiency Scheme and Forestry Grant Scheme are providing funding in this area.