- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 14 December 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ben Macpherson on 8 January 2021
To ask the Scottish Government how much public funding has been made available in each of the last five years to fund the (a) management and (b) monitoring of (i) Sites of Special Scientific Interest, (ii) Special Areas of Conservation and (iii) Special Protection Areas in order to improve their ecological condition.
Answer
It is not possible to disaggregate the data for the amount of public funding for management and monitoring of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and Special Protection Areas (SPAs) as a majority of SACs and SPAs are also designated as SSSIs. The following figures therefore cover all of the stated designations.
(a) Management
Expenditure/ £000 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 |
NatureScot Management Agreements | 1,044 | 964 | 794 | 739 | 674 |
Scottish Rural Development Programme (SRDP): Agri-environment Climate Scheme (AECS ) 1 | n/a | 1,926 | 4,765 | 6,861 | 7,440 |
Total | 1,044 | 2,890 | 5,559 | 7,600 | 8,114 |
Data source: NatureScot
Note 1:
The figures show committed funds. NatureScot do not have a report on the actual spend but this should only differ slightly.
The figures relate to cost of works scheduled within each year, not the value of contracts issued each year. The total for the current AECS programme is £43.4m.
The figures use a marker at field level to identify management that benefits Sites of Special Scientific Interests (SSSIs) or Natura features. This is a reasonable proxy but cannot give totally precise figures; partly because there will be contracts where only part of the AECS management within a field is relevant to SSSI/Natura, and partly because the marker may occasionally be wrongly used.
There is also SRDP funding for woodlands under the Forestry Grant Scheme (FGS) but it is not possible to detail how much FGS expenditure addresses woodland SSSIs and Natura features.
The following table shows the spend on both specialist contracts and staff costs used in delivering the Site Condition Monitoring (SCM) programme, by financial year, from 2016-17.
(b) Monitoring
Expenditure/ £000 | | 2016-17 | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-20 1 | 2020-21 2 |
Contracts | | 213 | 231 | 80 | 0 | 0 |
Staff costs | | 574 | 411 | 185 | Unknown | Unknown |
Total | | 787 | 642 | 265 | Unknown | Unknown |
Data source: NatureScot
Note 1: There was no spend on specialist contracts during 2019/20 due to the review of protected areas monitoring undertaken by NatureScot. Time estimates and therefore staff costs are not possible due to a move away from activity specific work recording.
Note 2: No specialist contracts were let in 2020/21 due to Covid-19 lockdown restrictions during the field season. Time estimates and therefore staff costs are not possible due to a move away from activity specific work recording.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 21 December 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Clare Haughey on 6 January 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-31967 by Clare Haughey on 5 October 2020, whether (a) the funded training of additional psychological therapists is available to NHS staff only, (b) it is funding training in (i) clinical and (ii) applied psychology for people who do not work in the NHS, and (c) it is funding training in cognitive behavioural therapy for people who do not work in the NHS.
Answer
(a) The funded training for additional psychological therapists (for both Clinical and Applied psychology) is open to individuals from any sector and applications show that whilst the majority of applicants are from NHS settings there are also applicants from a range of backgrounds.
(b) Each of the NES funded psychology programmes (including the Clinical and Applied programmes referred to above) have defined entry requirements. The programmes combine placement experience in one of the 14 health boards across NHS Scotland with teaching and research over the course of study to allow trainees develop to core competencies. Though prior experience of working in NHS settings may be beneficial to trainees on all programmes, it is not stipulated that applicants are required to work or have worked in the NHS. Entry requirements focus on a range of criteria including but not limited to; academic ability, relevant experience and interpersonal skills.
(c) The funded cognitive behavioural therapy training places are allocated to multidisciplinary staff working within health and social care that meet the relevant criteria. Staff from health backgrounds make up the majority of these training places but those who meet the criteria from non-NHS backgrounds are also considered.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 14 December 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ben Macpherson on 5 January 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on the regulation and use of neonicotinoid pesticides.
Answer
On 3 February 2021 thiacloprid loses EU and UK approval for use, joining clothianidin, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam which have not been approved in the UK since 2018. The Scottish Government supported the regulatory decisions to restrict the use of these insecticides and have no plans to alter this position unless the scientific evidence changes.
The Scottish Government continues to work with land managers and industry partners to promote best practice principles to further reduce reliance on pesticides as outlined in our Programme for Government. We encourage the use of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) to help land managers reduce and target their use of pesticides and adopt a site specific approach that integrates a range of complimentary control measures.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 December 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 18 December 2020
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on granting protected status to (a) hedgehogs and (b) hedgehog breeding sites from property developers.
Answer
As set out in the response to S5W-27518 answered on 28 February 2020, hedgehogs are listed on schedule 6 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981), which makes it illegal to kill or capture them using specified methods.
One of the principles in Scottish Planning Policy is that the planning system should seek benefits for biodiversity from new development where possible, including the restoration of degraded habitats and the avoidance of further fragmentation or isolation of habitats.
Scottish public bodies, including planning authorities, have a duty under the Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004 to further the conservation of biodiversity. This duty must be reflected in development plans and development management decisions.
While there is some evidence of a decline in hedgehog numbers, the available information is not sufficient to suggest that the species is in danger of extinction in Scotland. Steps being taken to halt the decline of hedgehogs in our towns and cities include the promotion of greenspace and green networks, for example through the Green Infrastructure Strategic Intervention managed by NatureScot.
The Scottish Government has no plans to change the legal protection for hedgehogs or their breeding sites.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 December 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 18 December 2020
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-33328 by Roseanna Cunningham on 2 December 2020, how many Habitats Regulations Appraisals have been completed regarding applications for the release of non-native gamebirds in each of the last 10 years; whether Scottish Natural Heritage will publish the environmental reports that informed these appraisals, and how many consents have been (a) issued and (b) denied in response to these.
Answer
NatureScot have carried out two Habitats Regulations Appraisals in the last ten years in relation to applications for the release of non-native gamebirds. The appraisals were undertaken using expert advice from NatureScot ornithologists. Both Appraisals concluded that there would be no adverse impact on the integrity of the sites in question and consents were issued in both cases.
NatureScot does not routinely publish Habitats Regulations Appraisals.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 December 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 18 December 2020
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-33328 by Roseanna Cunningham on 2 December 2020, whether NatureScot will publish its monitoring programme that led it to conclude that “there is little evidence to show that gamebirds are causing damage to European sites in Scotland”.
Answer
NatureScot’s Site Condition Monitoring Programme measures the health of the notified features across all of Scotland’s protected areas, including European sites. The Programme also identifies underlying causes for unfavourable condition of features in order to inform management actions. Gamebirds are mentioned in around 0.2% of these assessments and gamebird releases have not been identified as the cause of any features on protected sites being in unfavourable condition.
Details of the monitoring programme are available on the NatureScot website: https://www.nature.scot/professional-advice/protected-areas-and-species/protected-areas/site-condition-monitoring .
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 December 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 18 December 2020
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-33328 by Roseanna Cunningham on 2 December 2020, whether it considers its decision to take no action regarding the unregulated release of non-native gamebirds is consistent with the precautionary principle and the principle that preventative action should be taken to avert environmental damage, and what the reasons are for its position on this matter.
Answer
As set out in the response to S5W-33328, there is little evidence to show that released gamebirds are causing damage to European sites in Scotland. However we will consider, with NatureScot, whether any additional monitoring or research into the impact of gamebird releases around protected sites may be required in the future.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 03 December 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 17 December 2020
To ask the Scottish Government whether it plans to issue a further fleet compensation scheme or relief funding for the shellfish industry and, if so, whether this would be conditional on remote electronic monitoring.
Answer
Further support for the fleet and wider seafood sector is something I am presently considering, but I need the funding to do so. That is why I was so disappointed with the £8 million, one year, UK Government settlement for grant funding over 2020-2021. This falls way short of the £62 million multi-year settlement we made a clear case for, based on the EMFF replacement fund of over 4 billion. Whether its further hardship funding or supporting recovery within the Seafood sector, this funding is needed more so than ever before, and rest assured we will continue to press the UK Government hard for a fair share of funding.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 December 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 16 December 2020
To ask the Scottish Government, in the light of Scotland being declared an Avian Influenza Prevention Zone, what measures are in place to ensure that gamebird breeders (a) register captive flocks and (b) comply with all relevant aspects of the legislation.
Answer
a) It is a legal requirement for keepers of 50 or more birds (not necessarily of the same species) to register their birds with the Animal and Plant Health Agency. This information is regularly communicated to bird keepers and continues to be a key part of our avian influenza communications. Keepers with fewer than 50 birds are encouraged to register voluntarily.
b)The Scottish Government works closely with Defra, Welsh Government and the Animal and Plant Health Agency to promote and encourage poultry keepers to comply with the measures in the Avian Influenza Prevention Zone (AIPZ) and requirements of the GB Poultry Register. Local Authorities have the responsibility of enforcing the legislative requirements of the AIPZ and the GB Poultry Register.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 26 November 2020
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 15 December 2020
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-32898 by Fergus Ewing on 30 October 2020, whether, within the work of the new steering group and priority workstreams of the Farmed Fish Health Framework, (a) it still plans to (i) scale up the use of cleaner fish, with a concurrent increase of the production of farmed cleaner fish and (ii) introduce mandatory standards and requirements for cleaner fish welfare, including (A) mortality reporting, (B) humane slaughter and (C) species-specific welfare guidance and (b) there has been progress on the commitment to establish an international forum or platform to share cleaner fish husbandry best practice.
Answer
The new steering group will primarily focus on the priority workstreams outlined in the Scottish Government’s response to S5W-32898.
Progress has been made in relation to previous commitments on cleaner fish, including the introduction last week of mandatory controls over the harvesting of wild wrasse for managing sea lice in the salmon farming industry. In addition, in May 2018 the Scottish Salmon Producers Organisation organised an international workshop on best practice in the production and use of cleaner-fish, and The Code of Good Practice for Finfish Aquaculture has been updated to outline best practice for husbandry.
We will continue to develop work streams as considered necessary by the Farmed Fish Health Framework Steering Group going forward.