- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 March 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Margaret Curran on 20 April 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-2344 by Ms Margaret Curran on 17 September 2003, when it will be finalising the specific programme details from 2004-05 and 2005-06.
Answer
I have asked Angiolina Foster,Chief Executive of Communities Scotland to respond. Her response is as follows:
The Scottish Executive’s AffordableHousing Programme announcement for 2004-05 was made on 25 March 2004. Specific programme details for 2005-06 will be developedduring the course of 2004-05.
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 March 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Margaret Curran on 20 April 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answers to questions S2W-5903 and S2W-6823 by Ms Margaret Curran on 17 September 2003 and 24 March 2004 respectively, how many unit approvals are estimated to be provided in each local authority area for (a) 2004-05 and (b) 2005-06, broken down into (i) general needs housing, (ii) special needs housing, (iii) low cost housing and (iv) any other identifiable category.
Answer
I have asked Angiolina Foster, Chief Executive of Communities Scotland to respond. Her response is as follows:
Ministers have given a commitment to provide 18,000 new and improved homes for social rent and low cost home ownership in the three years up to 2006. Specific programme details for 2005-06 will be developed during the course of 2004-05.The following table shows the planned number of housing approvals in 2004-05 ineach local authority area split by general needs, special needs and low costhome ownership.
Table 1 – Housing Approvals by Category (2004-05)
Unitary Authority | Rent – General Needs No. | Rent – Special Needs No. | Low Cost Home Ownership No. |
Aberdeenshire Council | 75 | 35 | 48 |
Angus Council | 20 | 49 | 0 |
Argyll and Bute Council | 209 | 37 | 11 |
City of Aberdeen Council | 20 | 20 | 38 |
City of Dundee Council | 66 | 113 | 16 |
City of Edinburgh Council | 310 | 94 | 0 |
Clackmannan Council | 30 | 0 | 0 |
Dumfries and Galloway Council | 62 | 23 | 32 |
East Ayrshire Council | 14 | 2 | 16 |
East Dunbartonshire Council | 100 | 18 | 0 |
East Lothian Council | 73 | 0 | 7 |
East Renfrewshire Council | 68 | 21 | 80 |
Falkirk Council | 40 | 29 | 0 |
Fife Council | 113 | 53 | 0 |
Glasgow Council | 1,075 | 172 | 172 |
Highland Council | 148 | 16 | 108 |
Inverclyde Council | 98 | 24 | 100 |
Midlothian Council | 38 | 0 | 0 |
Moray Council | 58 | 45 | 10 |
North Ayrshire Council | 50 | 13 | 21 |
North Lanarkshire Council | 151 | 73 | 40 |
Orkney Islands Council | 4 | 0 | 29 |
Perthshire and Kinross Council | 60 | 40 | 41 |
Renfrewshire Council | 76 | 162 | 0 |
Shetland Islands Council | 4 | 0 | 4 |
South Ayrshire Council | 31 | 8 | 24 |
South Lanarkshire Council | 212 | 0 | 35 |
Stirling Council | 34 | 0 | 0 |
The Scottish Borders Council | 35 | 15 | 4 |
West Dunbartonshire Council | 44 | 20 | 36 |
West Lothian Council | 24 | 10 | 0 |
Western Isles Council | 35 | 6 | 3 |
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 30 March 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Frank McAveety on 13 April 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, whether in light of the announcement of additional funding for VisitScotland's marketing budget by the Minister for Tourism, Culture and Sport on 11 March 2004, funds previously earmarked for marketing by VisitScotland will be reallocated to administration or other budgets.
Answer
No. All resources previously assigned to the VisitScotland marketing budgets for 2003-04, 2004-05 and2005-06 will continue to be used to market Scotland as a must visit tourist destination.The additional resources totalling £17 million that I announced in the Parliament on 11 March will similarly be used to build on VisitScotland’s current marketing activities at both home and abroad.
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 19 March 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Frank McAveety on 2 April 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what level of funding will be provided to each of the new VisitScotland hubs in each of the next three years, broken down by source of funding; how such hubs will be constituted, and to whom they will be accountable.
Answer
The level of VisitScotlandfunding for each of the hubs will be a matter for VisitScotland. I refer to myanswer to S2W-7073 and S2W-7074 on 29 March 2004on the other matters. All the answer to written parliamentary questions areavailable on the parliament’s website, the search facility for which can befound at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 19 March 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mary Mulligan on 1 April 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-32874 by Des McNulty on 29 January 2003, how many telephone mast applications by mobile phone operators were (a) made, (b) granted, (c) refused, (d) granted on appeal and (e) refused on the grounds of health and safety and what the average time was for an application to be processed in (i) 2002 and (ii) 2003, broken down by local authority area.
Answer
Tables 1 and 2 show information on planning applications for radio telecommunications infrastructure, including ground based masts, additional antennas, roof based masts and equipment housing. The figures show for each planning authority the number of planning applications received during the period, the numbers granted permission, the numbers refused permission, the numbers refused permission on grounds relating to health and safety and the average time taken to determine planning applications. The figures for upheld appeals are taken from the Scottish Executive’s records.
Completion of the returns by planning authorities is voluntary, and there are therefore gaps in the returns. It should also be noted that where the number of grants/refusals of permission are higher than the number of applications received during the year this is due to the carrying over of applications from previous periods. Similarly, appeal decisions may relate to applications from an earlier period.
Telecommunications Data 2002
| Applications Made | Granted | Refused | Granted on Appeal | Refused on Health & Safety Grounds | Average time taken to determine (days) |
Aberdeen City* | 40 | 31 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 82 |
Aberdeenshire | 22 | 26 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 74 |
Angus | 16 | 14 | 1 | - | 0 | 69 |
Argyll and Bute | 41 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 57 |
Clackmannanshire* | 4 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | 63 |
Dumfries & Galloway | 23 | 27 | 1 | - | 0 | 78 |
Dundee City | 19 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 76 |
East Ayrshire | 18 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 115 |
East Dunbartonshire | 28 | 21 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 79 |
East Lothian | 24 | 17 | 3 | - | 0 | 72 |
East Renfrewshire | 13 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 85 |
Edinburgh | 160 | 131 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 79 |
Eilean Siar* | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48 |
Falkirk* | 32 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 79 |
Fife | 46 | 35 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 65 |
Glasgow City* | 128 | * | * | 1 | * | * |
Highland | 13 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 102 |
Inverclyde | 12 | 8 | 2 | - | 0 | 67 |
Midlothian* | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 52 |
Moray | 11 | 12 | 0 | - | 0 | 57 |
North Ayrshire | 19 | 18 | 3 | - | 0 | 56 |
North Lanarkshire | 40 | 42 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 88 |
Orkney* | 0 | * | * | - | * | * |
Perth and Kinross | 28 | 25 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 104 |
Renfrewshire | 38 | 27 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 76 |
Scottish Borders | 39 | 14 | 1 | - | 0 | 92 |
Shetland* | 3 | * | * | - | 0 | * |
South Ayrshire | 21 | 21 | 3 | - | 0 | 87 |
South Lanarkshire* | 77 | 58 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 83 |
Stirling | 16 | 13 | 3 | - | 0 | 78 |
West Dunbartonshire | 19 | 11 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 68 |
West Lothian | 41 | 32 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 62 |
Note: *Missing/incomplete return
Telecommunications Data 2003
| Applications Made | Granted | Refused | Granted on Appeal | Refused on Health & Safety Grounds | Average time taken to determine (days) |
Aberdeen City* | 32 | 23 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 67 |
Aberdeenshire* | 29 | 18 | 1 | - | 0 | 52 |
Angus | 20 | 20 | 3 | - | 0 | 60 |
Argyll and Bute | 43 | 31 | 2 | - | 0 | 62 |
Clackmannanshire* | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 55 |
Dumfries & Galloway | 46 | 44 | 1 | - | 0 | 65 |
Dundee City* | 10 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 66 |
East Ayrshire* | 19 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 135 |
East Dunbartonshire | 13 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 55 |
East Lothian | 11 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 38 |
East Renfrewshire | 13 | 9 | 2 | - | 0 | 53 |
Edinburgh* | 84 | 59 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 91 |
Eilean Siar* | 20 | 15 | 1 | - | 0 | 46 |
Falkirk* | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 52 |
Fife* | 35 | 30 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 132 |
Glasgow City* | 135 | * | * | 2 | 0 | * |
Highland* | 43 | 35 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 55 |
Inverclyde* | 6 | 4 | 1 | - | 0 | 74 |
Midlothian | 19 | 15 | 2 | - | 1 | 77 |
Moray | 21 | 10 | 0 | - | 0 | 35 |
North Ayrshire* | * | * | * | - | 0 | * |
North Lanarkshire | 32 | 30 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 63 |
Orkney* | * | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | * |
Perth and Kinross | 40 | 40 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 91 |
Renfrewshire* | 22 | 31 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 67 |
Scottish Borders* | 21 | 45 | 0 | - | 0 | 47 |
Shetland* | 0 | 2 | 0 | - | 0 | 110 |
South Ayrshire* | 18 | 17 | 2 | - | 0 | 78 |
South Lanarkshire | 37 | 36 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 72 |
Stirling | 10 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 48 |
West Dunbartonshire | 7 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 60 |
West Lothian* | 18 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 64 |
Note: *Missing/incomplete return.
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 18 March 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 1 April 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive how much has been received from road traffic (NHS charges) regulations in each year since their inception, broken down in respect of those treated (a) without admission to hospital and (b) in hospital, and how much it estimates will be received in each of the next three years in each category.
Answer
The following table shows the level of costs recovered in respect of the NHS treatment of road traffic accident victims since the introduction of the Road Traffic (NHS Charges) Act 1999:
Year | Payments made to Scottish NHS Trusts £ million |
1999-2000 | 1.837 |
2000-2001 | 4.595 |
2001-2002 | 5.971 |
2002-2003 | 5.818 |
2003-2004 (to 29 February) | 5.162 |
Information giving a breakdown of the amounts recovered in respect of those treated without admission to hospital and those treated in hospital is not held centrally by either the Scottish Executive or the Department for Work and Pension’s Compensation Recovery Unit which administers the scheme on behalf of theExecutive. Neither is it possible to estimate the level of costs which will berecovered in respect of each category of treatment in the next three years.
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 24 March 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Frank McAveety on 1 April 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what impact television has upon culture and what strategy it has in place to use television to promote Scotland.
Answer
The screenindustries, including television, can provide a showcase for the best ofScottish creative talent. We have engaged with the broadcasters in Scotland andthe independent producers of content for television by establishing the ScreenIndustries Summit Group. This industry-wide grouping is due to report to ministersin June 2004. I look forward to the input which the group will have to help formulateour future strategy.
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 24 March 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 1 April 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what relative financial contributions it and the Strategic Rail Authority will make to the upgrade at Waverley Station.
Answer
Discussionson the Waverley Station upgrade are continuing and decisions will be announcedin due course.
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 17 March 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 31 March 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what regulations exist in respect of the provision of late night chemists; what strategy exists to ensure that such facilities are accessible and central, and how many such chemists there are in the city of Edinburgh.
Answer
NHS boards are required,under the terms of the NHS (Pharmaceutical Services) (Scotland)Regulations, to arrange that one or more community pharmacies in their area beopen “at all reasonable times”. The days and times of “out of hours” openingmust be specified in respect of each participating pharmacy. Arrangements must alsobe made for urgently required prescriptions to be dispensed outwith thespecified hours.
Since 1999 the provision ofout-of-hours community pharmacy services has been a matter for localnegotiation between each NHS board and its area pharmaceutical committee.Information about the arrangements currently in place in the Edinburgharea will be available from NHS Lothian.
- Asked by: Kenny MacAskill, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 17 March 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 30 March 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there are any proposals to provide a minor injuries clinic in central Edinburgh following the relocation of the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and whether there has been an increase in ambulance call-outs from the city centre following the relocation of the infirmary.
Answer
The planning and provisionof minor injuries services are operational matters for NHS boards, in this caseNHS Lothian. I understand that NHS Lothian is currently reviewing serviceoptions, including the provision of minor injuries clinics in locations acrossthe health board’s area, including Edinburgh city.
I further understand fromthe Scottish Ambulance Service that, since March 2003, when the bulk ofservices provided at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh were relocated to LittleFrance, there has been a 1% increase in the number of 999 emergency ambulancecalls across the relevant catchment area. Other parts of Scotlandhave experienced larger increases in call numbers.