- Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Susan Deacon on 16 December 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive to list the birth and mortality rates and life expectancies for males and females for the years 1995-96, 1996-97, 1997-98 and 1998-99, broken down by health board.
Answer
The information available is given in the following tables:
Birth and death rates, by health board, Scotland, 1995 -1998 |
| Birth rate 1 | | Death rate 2 |
| 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 |
Scotland | 11.7 | 11.6 | 11.6 | 11.2 | | 11.8 | 11.8 | 11.6 | 11.6 |
Argyll & Clyde | 11.8 | 11.6 | 11.7 | 10.9 | | 12.2 | 12.6 | 12.3 | 12.5 |
Ayrshire & Arran | 11.1 | 11.0 | 11.1 | 10.8 | | 12.3 | 12.0 | 12.7 | 12.1 |
Borders | 11.0 | 10.7 | 10.7 | 9.8 | | 13.2 | 12.8 | 12.9 | 12.6 |
Dumfries & Galloway | 11.1 | 10.9 | 10.6 | 10.3 | | 11.9 | 12.8 | 12.4 | 12.3 |
Fife | 11.5 | 11.0 | 11.0 | 11.0 | | 11.3 | 11.4 | 11.2 | 11.5 |
Forth Valley | 11.6 | 11.6 | 11.5 | 11.5 | | 11.1 | 11.7 | 11.0 | 11.0 |
Grampian | 11.5 | 11.4 | 11.4 | 11.4 | | 10.3 | 9.9 | 9.8 | 9.9 |
Greater Glasgow | 12.2 | 12.1 | 12.1 | 11.3 | | 13.1 | 13.0 | 12.7 | 12.5 |
Highland | 11.6 | 11.4 | 11.7 | 11.8 | | 11.7 | 11.4 | 11.5 | 11.5 |
Lanarkshire | 12.0 | 12.2 | 12.1 | 11.8 | | 11.0 | 10.9 | 10.9 | 10.7 |
Lothian | 12.0 | 11.8 | 11.9 | 11.4 | | 11.0 | 11.3 | 10.8 | 10.7 |
Orkney | 11.6 | 10.9 | 11.3 | 9.9 | | 11.9 | 11.6 | 12.0 | 12.5 |
Shetland | 12.6 | 11.7 | 12.4 | 11.6 | | 10.1 | 10.9 | 10.6 | 10.6 |
Tayside | 11.1 | 11.0 | 11.2 | 10.8 | | 12.7 | 12.9 | 12.4 | 12.7 |
Western Isles | 10.4 | 9.7 | 8.9 | 9.8 | | 14.8 | 14.9 | 14.8 | 14.1 |
1 Live births per 1,000 population2 Deaths per 1,000 population | | | | | | | | | |
Expectation of life at birth, by sex and health board, Scotland |
| 1994-1996 | | 1995-1997 | | 1996-1998 |
| Males | Females | | Males | Females | | Males | Females |
Scotland | 72.0 | 77.7 | | 72.2 | 77.8 | | 72.4 | 77.9 |
Argyll & Clyde | 71.0 | 77.2 | | 71.2 | 77.3 | | 71.1 | 77.3 |
Ayrshire & Arran | 72.5 | 77.8 | | 72.6 | 77.4 | | 72.8 | 78.0 |
Borders | 75.0 | 79.4 | | 74.7 | 79.6 | | 74.9 | 79.7 |
Dumfries & Galloway | 73.7 | 78.8 | | 73.9 | 79.1 | | 74.2 | 79.0 |
Fife | 73.1 | 78.5 | | 73.4 | 78.8 | | 73.4 | 78.7 |
Forth Valley | 72.8 | 77.6 | | 73.1 | 78.0 | | 73.1 | 78.3 |
Grampian | 73.7 | 79.1 | | 73.9 | 79.4 | | 74.2 | 79.6 |
Greater Glasgow | 69.8 | 76.1 | | 69.9 | 76.2 | | 70.2 | 76.4 |
Highland | 72.5 | 78.7 | | 72.6 | 78.6 | | 72.8 | 78.9 |
Lanarkshire | 71.1 | 76.8 | | 71.7 | 76.8 | | 71.9 | 77.0 |
Lothian | 72.8 | 78.1 | | 72.9 | 78.2 | | 73.0 | 78.2 |
Orkney | 73.9 | 80.5 | | 74.1 | 79.6 | | 74.1 | 79.3 |
Shetland | 71.9 | 79.0 | | 72.1 | 80.6 | | 72.6 | 80.0 |
Tayside | 72.6 | 78.1 | | 73.0 | 78.3 | | 73.4 | 78.3 |
Western Isles | 71.5 | 79.1 | | 70.7 | 79.0 | | 70.9 | 79.7 |
| | | | | | | | |
- Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 03 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jack McConnell on 16 December 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive what criteria were used in determining that Castlemilk and Dennistoun wards within the City of Glasgow should be awarded Objective 2 status and that Toryglen and Crosshill wards should have Objective 2 status removed.
Answer
The Structural Funds Regulations direct Objective 2 support towards areas undergoing socio-economic change. Assistance has to be concentrated on significant areas most affected, with due regard to national priorities. In this context the minor changes to the wards proposed in Glasgow I announced on 2 December were defined better to reflect these priorities, in the light of representations made to the Scottish Executive by Glasgow City Council.
- Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Frank McAveety on 16 December 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive when it intends to discontinue the practice of self-financing pay awards in local government.
Answer
Local authorities are expected to meet the cost of pay awards within the total provision for Government Supported Expenditure, which will be £6,746 million next year, an increase of 3.7% over the comparable figure this year, and higher than the forecast increase in the RPI.
- Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sam Galbraith on 15 December 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive to list the categories of authorised absence currently permitted in Scottish schools.
Answer
Authorised absence is defined as:
sickness;
medical and dental treatment;
bereavement;
domestic circumstances relating to exceptional hardship at home;
no school within walking distance and no transport arrangements;
study leave;
religious observance;
family holidays where attendance is otherwise satisfactory;
meetings prior to, and in, court;
attendance at, or in connection with, a Children's Hearing;
attendance at, or in connection with, a Child Care Review;
weddings of immediate family;
certified debates, sports, musical or theatrical productions not arranged by, or in conjunction with, the school;
extended visits overseas to relatives;sanctioned, extended absence in relation to children of travelling families.
- Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sam Galbraith on 15 December 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive to detail the number and percentage of secondary school pupils not attending school through (a) authorised absence and (b) unauthorised absence in the school years 1996-97, 1997-98 and 1998-99.
Answer
Data on the numbers of individual pupils not attending school through authorised or unauthorised absence is not collated nationally. The information can only be represented as an aggregated number of possible attendance.
The annual percentage of absence in secondary schools for the years 1996-97 to 1998-99 was as follows:Secondary Schools | 1996-97 | 1997-98 | 1998-99 |
Authorised Absence | 11% | 10% | 10% |
Unauthorised Absence | 1% | 1% | 1% |
- Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sam Galbraith on 15 December 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive to detail, for each category of authorised absence, the number and percentage of secondary school pupils not attending school in 1996-97, 1997-98 and 1998-99.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to S1W-2882 for the number of authorised absences among secondary school pupils in 1996-97, 1997-98 and 1998-99. More detailed information on categories of authorised absence is not collected by the Scottish Executive.
- Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sam Galbraith on 14 December 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive what steps it is taking to reduce the levels of both authorised and unauthorised absence among school pupils.
Answer
To assist education authorities, schools, teachers and parents in tackling non-attendance the Government supported the publication of the Scottish Initiative on Attendance, Absence and Attainment's good practice document Close to the Mark, which was published in December 1997. This publication offers practical support materials for schools, pulling together the examples of good practice identified by the Initiative in its work on attendance issues. It contains guidelines to help a school evaluate and develop its own practice in line with HMI publication How Good is our School?. Good practice is shared between schools through the Ethos NetworkSchools and education authorities have now agreed targets to raise attendance, and are putting in place strategies to meet those targets. The framework for setting targets was set out in Setting Targets - Raising Standards in Schools, published on 4 March 1998. Locally agreed targets where returned to HMI at the end of last year.Several initiatives funded under the Excellence Fund for Schools - Special Programme, including New Community Schools and Education Action Plans, contain components for reducing the level of absence.
- Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 19 November 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 10 December 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive what it anticipates will be the net loss or gain in jobs and investment in the west of Scotland if the M74 Northern Extension is not built.
Answer
The recent report by the Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment (SACTRA) on "Transport and the Economy" highlighted the complexities associated with analysing the local economic impacts of transport schemes. They cautioned against exaggerated claims for the significance of such impacts, and argued that studies of local economic development impacts should take full account of the likely displacement of jobs from other areas. The report set out a number of recommendations on how such studies should be carried out. The Executive is currently considering, with the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, the implications of the SACTRA report for its future appraisal methodology.The appraisal carried out for the Strategic Roads Review indicated that the M74 Northern Extension would be likely to have an overall positive impact on the local economy. At this stage, it is impossible to be more precise than this.
- Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 19 November 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 10 December 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive on what basis it has chosen to designate the M74 a local rather than a strategic road.
Answer
The M74 Northern Extension was first proposed by Strathclyde Regional Council and has been taken forward by Glasgow City and South Lanarkshire Councils as successors to Strathclyde Region. No Government, past or present, has given any commitment to designate the proposed route a trunk road. A strategic route through Glasgow is already provided by the M8, which was incorporated into the trunk road network on 1 April 1996. The Executive is committing very significant resources to the M8 through Glasgow, including a £30m programme of structural repairs on the Kingston Bridge, to address the inherited problems. The M8 through Glasgow is used by high volumes of local traffic, including a significant element of commuting by car. The Strategic Roads Review appraisal shows that the M74 Northern Extension would have a similar mix of strategic and local traffic. The need for additional motorway capacity across the city has to be considered in the context of the Local Transport Strategies which Glasgow City, South Lanarkshire and all other Councils in the area have been asked to prepare. The authorities concerned are best placed to assess the contribution which the M74 scheme can make to the delivery of these strategies and to address the significant impacts inevitably associated with any urban motorway.
- Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 19 November 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 10 December 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive what impact it would expect a decision not to proceed with the M74 Northern Extension to have on the growth of traffic through Glasgow Airport.
Answer
I have asked Glasgow City and South Lanarkshire Councils to take forward proposals for the M74 Northern Extension in the context of their Local Transport Strategies and in co-operation with other authorities, including Renfrewshire. These strategies should aim to improve access, including public transport access, across their areas and to reduce congestion, thus increasing the reliability of journey times. Such strategies should improve access to Glasgow Airport and assist in its development.