Seòmar agus comataidhean

The initial identification of individual sites to participate in these trials takes place independently of government and is the responsibility of the Supply Chain Initiative on Modified Agricultural Crops, a body representing the interests of the industry including the National Farmers Union within its membership. The proposed sites must meet the criteria set out by the impartial Scientific Steering Committee which oversees the UK farm-scale evaluation programme. They are selected to represent a variety of conditions, such as climate, ecology and soil type as well as farm type and are intended to provide a representative sample of UK agriculture.The Scientific Steering Committee members are:Chairman:Professor Christopher Pollock, Research Director of the Institute of Environmental and Grassland Research.Members:Dr Nicholas Aebisher, Deputy Director of Research for the Game Conservancy TrustDr Alastair Burn, English Nature;Professor Mick Crawley, Imperial College;Dr David Gibbons, Head of Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds;Mr Jim Orson, Director Morley Research Centre;Dr Nick Sotherton, Director of Research for the Game Conservancy Trust;The Scottish Executive is represented on this committee by officials from the Rural Affairs Department who attend meetings and act as assessors.

Neither the governing European Directive 90/220/EEC nor the Environmental Protection Act 1990 require or provide a basis for consultation on any aspect of a proposed release.The recently adopted package of revisions to EU 90/220/EEC makes increased provision for public consultation. In the coming months the Scottish Executive will be seeking the views of stakeholders as to how the implementation of the revised Directive should be taken forward.

The Scottish Executive is required to operate within European and UK Legislation on the deliberate release of genetically modified crops. Under Directive 90/220/EEC consent can only be refused where scientific evidence is available to suggest that the release would cause harm to human health or the environment. The legislation does not permit an application to be rejected solely in response to local opposition. A decision on that basis would be illegal.

The current statutory notification period is determined in the Environmental Protection Act 1990. The Scottish Executive is aware however of the limited opportunity which this allows for public consideration and comment. Accordingly, assurances have been sought and gained from the biotechnology companies which will provide a longer notification period for this spring's farm evaluations. The exact period of notification has not yet been determined.

The "local community", as applied to the Local Facilities Strand of the Sports Facilities Programme, is determined through sportscotland's supply/demand model and is the appropriate catchment for a particular facility type. This varies from facility to facility and is affected by location, geography and transportation.Other strands of the programme take account of "communities of interest". For example, the National and Regional strands focus on discrete sporting groups, including disabled persons.

Following my announcement on 13 December, the Executive wrote to all Education Authorities, Further Education colleges and heads of other centres on 18 December inviting them to submit requests for review by 10 January. By 19 January, the Appeals Review team had received 3,974 returns.In order to ensure that no appeals were excluded solely because of their late submission, the Appeals Review team accepted requests for review as late as 29 January when subject teams began their work. In a few very exceptional cases, requests have been accepted beyond this date. However, at this stage in the process it is no longer possible for the team to accept more new cases.As at 21 February, 4,216 cases were included in the appeals review process, and a breakdown of these cases by Education Authority is shown in the table.

Appeals Review 2000Numbers of cases by education authority

ABERDEEN CITY	86
ABERDEENSHIRE	210
ANGUS	100
ARGYLL & BUTE	81
CLACKMANNAN	14
DUMFRIES & GALLOWAY	238
DUNDEE CITY	94
EAST AYRSHIRE	136
EAST DUNBARTONSHIRE	117
EAST LOTHIAN	67
EAST RENFREWSHIRE	100
CITY OF EDINBURGH	276
EILEAN SIAR	47
FALKIRK	77
FIFE	271
GLASGOW CITY	253
HIGHLAND	139
INVERCLYDE	69
MIDLOTHIAN	68
MORAY	67
NORTH AYRSHIRE	96
NORTH LANARKSHIRE	184
ORKNEY ISLANDS	19
PERTH & KINROSS	66
RENFREWSHIRE	137
SCOTTISH BORDERS	163
SHETLAND ISLANDS	3
SOUTH AYRSHIRE	106
SOUTH LANARKSHIRE	147
STIRLING	72
WEST DUNBARTON	43
WEST LOTHIAN	92
TOTAL	3,638
FE COLLEGES	71
INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS	507
TOTAL CASES	4,216

It is not sportscotland's practice to disclose to third parties whether or not it has received an application from any particular person or group.

Once the Scottish Transport Group is wound-up the Scottish Executive will be able to access the records held by the Trustees to the pension schemes. We expect these records will require some updating particularly as regards current addresses. In advance of wind-up, however, we have taken the following steps towards such updating: we have set up a dedicated phone line with voicemail advising callers to write to us for a pro-forma to register their interest and a letter providing background to the announcement; we have spoken and/or written to the main trade unions advising them of the position and have provided them with material to pass to their members who are making enquiries; we have written to the Confederation of Passenger Transport to explain the position and asked them to provide our information to all their Scottish bus company members, again supplying pro-formas for pension scheme members to send to us to help verify records; we have written to CalMac in similar vein (some of their employees will have been in STG pension schemes); and we propose to set up a departmental web page from which access to the latest information and pro-forma will be available.

The treatment of the surplus represents unfinished pre-devolution business. The UK Government's long established position has been that the surplus should go to the UK Exchequer, and the Scottish Assigned Budget Settlement has been progressed on that basis.There is no legal entitlement on the part of Scottish Transport Group pension scheme members to share in the surplus. Scottish Ministers have, however, agreed with the Chancellor of the Exchequer that ex-gratia payments should be made to STG pension scheme members which would be broadly equivalent to the final settlement for National Bus Company pension scheme members south of the border. An appropriate amount has accordingly been earmarked for distribution.

Our recent consultation paper on the Renewables Obligation (Scotland) addressed a number of issues, including the matter of qualifying renewable energy technologies. We will take decisions on these issues once we have completed analysing the many responses received.