- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 13 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what steps it is taking to promote use of the West Highland railway line and address any decline in the amount of freight being carried on the line.
Answer
To encourage the movement of freight by rail, the Scottish Executive has committed £39 million over the next three years (2001-04) towards the Freight Facilities Grant and Track Access Grant schemes. The Executive will consider applications for grants under these schemes from industry throughout Scotland, including the Highlands. Applications are assessed against value for money and environmental benefits criteria.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 31 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jack McConnell on 13 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive whether those who complete the Open University Postgraduate Certificate in Education, which is recognised in England, are qualified to teach in Scotland and, if not, whether it will specify which elements of the qualification it does not recognise.
Answer
Scotland does not currently participate in the Open University (OU) Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) programme. Institutions are able, however, to offer any course on a part-time basis provided it meets the requirements set out in the Guidelines for Initial Teacher Education in Scotland. No proposals have been received for such a course from the OU since 1992.Registration with the General Teaching Council for Scotland (GTCS) is a requirement for teaching in all education authority schools in Scotland. All teachers who have not trained in Scotland and who wish to teach here must seek exceptional admission to the GTCS register. As long as a teacher with a qualification through the OU in England fulfils the council's requirements with regards to academic qualifications, professional training and relevant experience there should be no difficulty in gaining entry to the register of persons entitled to teach in Scotland.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 23 January 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 11 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-8984 by Sarah Boyack on 25 August 2000, whether its statement that it "will have regard to" the Statement of Practice on Staff Transfers in the Public Sector means that it is following the recommendations of the statement; what requirements the tender documents for the trunk road unit contracts specified in relation to the protection of occupational pensions, and whether it will place a copy of any such requirements in SPICe, specifying the reasons for its position on this matter.
Answer
The Scottish Executive has had regard to the Statement of Practice on Staff Transfers in the Public Sector. The new maintenance term contracts require the successful bidder to fulfil any obligations arising from TUPE. Each of the winning contractors has transferred affected staff under TUPE terms.Specimen copies of the Instructions for Tendering and Part 11 of the Contract Agreement which refers to TUPE have been lodged in the Parliament's Reference Centre.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 11 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 11 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what steps it will take to effect road safety improvements at Duror, in particular at Achindarroch Road end and Cuil Bay Road end, and whether any such work will be carried out by BEAR Scotland Ltd.
Answer
Work to improve road safety on this route was completed last year, as part of a Route Accident Reduction Plan on the A828 between Connel and Ballachulish. This included signing and lining measures at Duror and the Achindarroch and Cuil Bay junctions. Further safety improvements including the final stage of the Duror footway scheme and improved visibility at the Achindarroch junction are being progressed by BEAR Scotland Ltd.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 22 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 5 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive when the policy that fish farmers whose fish farmed livestock are compulsorily slaughtered are not entitled to compensation was first established.
Answer
The first claim for compensation in these circumstances was turned down in 1996.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 22 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 5 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what legal advice it has received on whether the lack of a scheme to compensate fish farmers for the compulsory slaughter of fish breaches the provisions of Article 1 of the First Protocol of the European Convention on Human Rights and article 14 of the Convention itself; what consideration it has given to any case law which applies in this matter and, in particular, what consideration it has given to any precedent set in Handyside v UK (A/24) (1976) relevant to this matter.
Answer
Our legal advice is that policy on compensation for fish farmers in these circumstances is not in breach of these provisions. Consideration has been given to a range of case law, including Handyside v UK. The matter is currently being examined by the European Court of Justice.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 22 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 5 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what estimate it has made of any additional costs incurred by fish farmers in each year since Her Majesty's Government's decision not to adopt EU Council Decision 90/424, which provides compensation for the compulsory slaughter of farmed fish.
Answer
No such estimate has been made. The provisions of Decision 90/424 apply to neither of the fish diseases for which compulsory slaughter has been required.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 22 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 5 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what EC compensation schemes for losses incurred by fish farmers as a result of the compulsory slaughter of farmed fish it is aware of and whether it will provide details of any such schemes.
Answer
We are aware of no such schemes.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 22 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 5 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has any plans to introduce proposals to provide backing for an insurance scheme in respect of the compulsory slaughter of farmed fish.
Answer
Such plans have been proposed and rejected as any Government contribution would be tantamount to compensation. We have, however, secured and implemented an amendment to EC fish health legislation to allow fish to be withdrawn from infected farms at a rate determined by the level of disease present. It is our hope that the withdrawal scheme will enable compulsory slaughter to be an insurable risk and to this end my officials have had meetings with insurance industry representatives.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 April 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus MacKay on 29 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will publish all advice, direction or guidance given to local authorities in respect of the proposed rates relief package for businesses affected by the foot-and-mouth disease outbreak.
Answer
Guidance was issued to local authorities in Finance Circular No. 1/2001, a copy of which is available in the Parliament's Reference Centre (Bib. no. 12527).