- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 07 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 1 November 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what steps it has taken, or will take, to ensure that one national insurance policy is obtained in order to provide cover for children participating in sport, recreational physical exercise and outdoor activity, including school excursions and foreign holidays, and whether the establishment of such a policy could effect savings for local authorities who are presently responsible for ensuring that such insurance cover exists.
Answer
Local authorities have public liability insurance cover for the extent of their own legal liability across all the services, including education, for which they are responsible. Consideration of insurance cover beyond that would be a matter for individual local authorities or for other parties involved in the provision of the activities referred to.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 1 November 2002
To ask the Presiding Officer whether the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body (SPCB) will give a detailed breakdown of the #14.2 million landscaping costs in relation to the Holyrood Project; what cost savings the SPCB has considered, detailing which savings have been incorporated and, where cost savings were considered but not made, what the reasons were, and what cost savings the SPCB is currently considering or plans to consider in the future.
Answer
The information of the landscaping costs are as follows:
Category | £ million |
Construction | 7.7 |
Fees | 1.9 |
Land acquisition | 0.3 |
Risk and Inflation | 1.8 |
Muster Room | 0.5 |
VAT | 2.0 |
Total | 14.2 |
The SPCB and the Holyrood Project Group consider opportunities for cost savings on an on-going basis across the whole project, including savings for the landscaping development. Decisions to implement cost saving measures are taken whenever the quality of the finished product and the integrity of the architects' design concepts will not be materially compromised and are balanced against the impact on other works packages and any programme implications. The cost savings information is not collated in the detailed manner requested, and no separate exercise is being undertaken.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 07 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 30 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the waste presently disposed of at Longman landfill site, which is due to be closed from April 2003, will be disposed of in a landfill site near Peterhead and, if so, what estimate has been made of the additional haulage traffic that will use the A96 and other trunk roads in order to complete the journey from Inverness to Peterhead.
Answer
Treatment and disposal of municipal waste is the responsibility of the local authority, in this case Highland Council. The council is preparing a public private partnership (PPP) scheme as a long-term sustainable waste management solution which will be in accordance with the agreed Area Waste Plan. However, the council has informed the Executive of their intention to arrange for interim disposal of municipal waste, which is currently disposed of at Longman landfill site, in a landfill near Peterhead. The council has assessed that for this waste, traffic will amount to some 15 articulated vehicles per day.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 11 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mary Mulligan on 30 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will detail all research and the cost of such research into amnesic shellfish poisoning commissioned or carried out by the Food Standards Agency Scotland (FSAS).
Answer
The FSAS have advised me that the following table details all research they have carried out or commissioned into amnesic shellfish poisoning. Food Standards Agency Scotland Research into ASP
Date | Title | Purpose | Total Cost (£000) |
December 2001 to July 2002 | Measurement of ASP in King Scallops processed in Scotland | This study was designed to establish the acceptable and proportionate levels of end product testing for whole, roe-on and roe-off scallops in the tiered system. | 154 |
January 2000 to September 2003 | Phytoplankton study | Project initiated to investigate the relationship between phyoplankton and levels of ASP PSP and DSP. | 450 |
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 11 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 30 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many people work in the scallop industry, broken down by fishermen, processors and others.
Answer
The Scottish Executive does not hold details of people employed in the scallop industry. There are currently 191 Scottish vessels licensed to fish for scallops, of which 102 have caught scallops in 2002 and 51 have caught scallops only.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 11 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mary Mulligan on 30 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will invite the Food Standards Agency Scotland to submit the data on samples taken from (a) scallops and (b) mussels since amnesic shellfish poisoning testing was introduced, showing the levels of algal toxins, in order to challenge scientifically the trigger level of 4.6 micrograms per gram set in the European Commission Decision 2002/226 EC, in the light of the suggestion by the European Commission Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General to the Rural Development Committee at its meeting on 8 October 2002.
Answer
Food Standards Agency Scotland (FSAS) advise me that they wrote to the Commission on 15 October to ask their thoughts on how a review of the 4.6mg/kg trigger level could be pursued. The FSAS will be happy to provide data on scallops and mussels, should the relevant European scientific committees request it.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 02 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 29 October 2002
To ask the Presiding Officer, further to his answer to question S1W-29132 on 24 September 2002, what the (a) names are of the contractors for the 16 works packages let as part of the Holyrood project where a performance bond is outstanding and (b) total value was of the package awarded to each of these contractors and whether there will be any claim or possible claim in relation to the eight packages let as part of the Holyrood project where a performance bond is no longer required.
Answer
Negotiations on Trade Contracts for the new Scottish Parliament building at Holyrood are carried out on a commercially confidential basis and it would not be appropriate to name publicly those contractors who have yet to provide a Performance Bond, particularly as most contracts in this category have only recently been awarded. The Convener of the Holyrood Progress Group has informed me that there are currently no claims under consideration relating to those Trade Contracts where a Performance Bond is no longer required.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 29 October 2002
To ask the Presiding Officer, further to his answer to question S1W-30288 on 18 October 2002, why the breakdown of fees payable to consultants involved in the Holyrood project was commercially confidential, given that the breakdown of fees payable to Davis Langdon & Everest, EMBT/RMJM Ltd, Ove Arup and Partners, RMJM Scotland Limited and Bovis Lend Lease (Scotland) Limited was disclosed in the Auditor's General's report The New Scottish Parliament Building - An examination of the management of the Holyrood Project (AGS/2000/2) and whether the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body considers that information on consultants' fees is in the public interest.
Answer
The SPCB regards the amount of fees paid to individual consultants as commercially confidential. Publication of such information by the Parliament would generally be considered as something that might impede fair competition between them and their competitors and/or prejudice the consultants', or the Parliament's, future negotiating position. Disclosure would also be in breach of the individual tender agreements between the Parliament and the consultants, which were agreed on a commercially confidential basis and could not be made without the agreement of the firms involved. I understand from the Convener of the Holyrood Progress Group that the Auditor General was required to obtain the specific approval of the respective consultants before authority for publication of the figures was given under the particular circumstances. The Parliament would not normally release such information unilaterally and that is only proper. It is the case that certain elements of fee agreements are still under discussion, however, once outstanding negotiations have been concluded and subject to clearance with the Parliament's legal office, we would expect to secure the agreement of the consultants involved and make these details available.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 29 October 2002
To ask the Presiding Officer whether any estimate has been made of the costs to the Holyrood project in the event that the "degree of uncertainty" referred to by the Holyrood Project Director at the Finance Committee on 8 October 2002 (Official Report, c 2244) results in the new Parliament building not being completed and ready for occupation by December 2003 and, if so, whether the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body will give a detailed breakdown of this estimate.
Answer
The Convener of the Holyrood Progress Group has confirmed that no estimates for such an outcome are available at this stage, and as was reported to the Finance Committee at their meeting on 8 October 2002, once the position on programme is more certain, any financial implications will be reported to the committee.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 11 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 29 October 2002
To ask the Presiding Officer whether there is any conflict of interest between the Parliament and Bovis Lend Lease(Scotland) Ltd in relation to the Holyrood Project.
Answer
No.