- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 31 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by George Reid on 27 August 2003
To ask the Presiding Officer what the overspend on the new Parliament building has been in each year since 1999 and which budget sub-head has met this overspend.
Answer
Expenditure on the new Parliament building at Holyrood has been less than the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body’s (SPCB) approved annual budget for each financial year since the commencement of the project. There has therefore been no overspend against budget. The expenditure, net of reclaimable VAT, for each year is shown in the table below.
Year | £ Million |
1999-2000 | 13.7 |
2001-01 | 27.1 |
2001-02 | 44.4 |
2002-03 | 95.3P |
PProvisional subject to audit.
The SPCB’s capital expenditurebudget is reviewed by the Finance Committee each year and is formally approvedby Parliament in the relevant budget act. Any underspend against the approvedbudget is available to carry forward to subsequent financial years under the endyear flexibility provisions.
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 17 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mary Mulligan on 14 August 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will publish the advice, documentation and reports given to ministers prior to its decision not to call in the decision to approve the water treatment plant at Milngavie.
Answer
The Scottish ministers do not issue a detailed report of their assessment in circumstances such as this where they are not determining the planning application. Internal planning documents are exempt from disclosure under exemption 2 of Part II of the Code of Practice on Access to Scottish Executive Information as they include information relating to internal discussion and advice.The Scottish ministers are, of course, aware that there is a general presumption against development in the green belt. However, such development may be acceptable in special circumstances. In this case it was clear that there was a pressing need for a new water treatment works to improve the quality of drinking water supplied to the Greater Glasgow area in order to meet current regulatory standards.The Scottish ministers were aware that East Dunbartonshire Council received over 3,900 objections to the proposal. And they were also aware that the Council had received more than 3,300 letters supporting the development. Ministers may call-in a planning application where it is considered that a planning authority has failed to give full consideration to local objections. But a substantial volume of objections is not in itself sufficient grounds to call in an application. All other relevant issues must be taken into account, as they were in this case, and a balanced decision reached.
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 16 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 13 August 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive how much the General Register Office for Scotland collected in access charges to its website www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk in (a) 2000-01 and (b) 2001-02.
Answer
The ScotlandsPeople website did not come into operation until 2 September 2002, so the General Register Office for Scotland collected no income from it during financial years 2000-01 and 2001-02. ScotlandsPeople replaced the Scots Origins website, from which GROS derived £63,346 in income from accesses to the site in the financial year 2000-01 and £164,704 in 2001-02.
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 16 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 13 August 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive how much the General Register Office for Scotland spent on (a) advertising and (b) sponsorship in (i) 2000-01 and (ii) 2001-02.
Answer
The General Register Office for Scotland spent £501,581 on advertising during financial year 2000-01 and £618,046 during 2001-02. This expenditure related mainly to publicity for the 2001 Census and includes fees paid to appointed publicity agents. During the same period there was no expenditure on sponsorship.
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 15 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 8 August 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what locus or responsibilities it has regarding the introduction of local byelaws on drinking in public places.
Answer
The introduction of byelawsis a matter for local authorities under section 201 of the Local Government (Scotland)Act 1973. The Executive has a supervisory role, in that Scottish ministersultimately confirm all byelaws, but the initiative in making them lies with thelocal authority.
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 11 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 7 August 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive how many road accidents occurred on the Stirling to Ballat Cross stretch of the A811 in 2002.
Answer
Data about injury road accidents are collected by the police and reported to the Scottish Executive using the STATS 19 statistical report form. These returns cover only road accidents in which one or more people were injured: they do not cover damage only accidents.During 2002, there were 20 injury road accidents that were identified in the STATS 19 returns as occurring on the A811 between its junction with the A811 at Ballat Cross and the centre of Stirling.It should be noted that this figure is based upon the data which are held in the central statistical database and which were collected by the police at the time of the accident and subsequently reported to the Executive. It may differ from any figure which the local authority would provide now, because it does not take account of any subsequent changes or corrections that the local authority may have made to the statistical information, for use at local level, about the location of each accident, based upon its knowledge of the road and area concerned.
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 11 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 7 August 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive how many road accidents occurred on the Stirling to Lochearnhead stretch of the A84 in (a) 2001 and (b) 2002.
Answer
The number of injury accidents that have occurred on the A84 between Stirling and Lochearnhead in 2001 and 2002 are as follows:
Year | Fatal | Serious | Slight | Total |
2001 | 2 | 8 | 18 | 28 |
2002 | 0 | 8 | 11 | 19 |
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 6 August 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive how many of its contracts have been awarded to Scotland the Brand since April 2003 and what each such contract was worth.
Answer
One contract has been awarded to Scotland the Brand since April 2003 with a value of £32,000.
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 6 August 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what process has been followed in the awarding of public contracts to Scotland the Brand and whether any other companies were invited to bid for these contracts.
Answer
In mid May, Scotland the Brand was offered a contract to co-ordinate the showcasing of Scottish food and drink at the planned evening of Scottish culture this coming September in Barcelona. Given their specialist marketing skills and in light of the time available for planning this event, no other contractors were invited to bid on this particular occasion.
- Asked by: Mr Brian Monteith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 July 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 6 August 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what progress is being made with the establishment of safety camera partnerships in respect of road safety; what areas have yet to establish such partnerships, and what funding has been committed to this project.
Answer
To date six out of eight Scottish safety camera partnerships have been approved in Dumfries and Galloway, Fife, Grampian, Lothian and Borders, Strathclyde and Tayside. It is expected that the remaining two partnerships, Central and Northern, will go live next year.By agreement with HM Treasury, the Scottish safety camera partnerships are resourced from hypothecated fine income.