- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 30 October 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 8 November 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the Foot and Mouth Disease Contingency Plan has been reviewed to address the bluetongue outbreak in England.
Answer
Bluetongue andfoot-and-mouth disease are two separate exotic notifiable diseases requiring separatedisease control responses. The UK Bluetongue Control Strategy is being revised asa result of a new Commission Regulation on bluetongue.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 30 October 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 8 November 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive what specific financial assistance it has formally requested from the UK Government other than assistance under the Sheep Welfare Scheme.
Answer
The Cabinet Secretaryfor Finance and Sustainable Growth wrote to the Chief Secretary to the Treasuryon 24 October 2007 seeking reimbursement of £25 million, whichwe estimate to be the cost of the support package that I announced on that day.The package includes the cost of the Sheep Welfare Scheme. We still await a formalresponse.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 30 October 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 8 November 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it expects to be copied any future drafts of statements or other documents by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) following the Executive’s release of the recent DEFRA draft statement for the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Answer
The Scottish Governmentfully expects to continue having a positive working relationship with the Departmentfor Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 30 October 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 8 November 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will provide a breakdown by local authority area of the number of sheep culled for welfare reasons under the Sheep Welfare Scheme.
Answer
As at 2 November 2007, 60,632 animals have been slaughtered under the SheepWelfare Scheme. The following table shows the number of animals presented to collectioncentres within the local authority areas listed. These animals were subsequentlyslaughtered. The local authority areas listed are those which contain one or morecollection centres.
| Local Authority Area | Number of Animals Presented (and Slaughtered) |
| Aberdeenshire | 1,388 |
| Angus | 873 |
| Argyll and Bute | 11,080 |
| Dumfries and Galloway | 6,507 |
| Highlands | 5,291 |
| Orkney Islands | 2,358 |
| Perth and Kinross | 3,653 |
| Scottish Borders | 3,641 |
| Shetland Islands | 18,565 |
| South Lanarkshire | 4,048 |
| Stirling | 3,228 |
| Total | 60,632 |
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 30 October 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 8 November 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive how much funding is available under the Rural Development Plan which could be allocated to enable new rural abattoirs to be established.
Answer
There is no specificallocation of funds through the Scotland Rural Development Programme 2007-13 forthe establishment of rural abattoirs. However, grants may be available through the programme on a competitivebasis under the Agriculture Processing and Marketing Grant Scheme towards the constructionof new facilities, or the upgrading of existing facilities, as well as the purchaseof plant and equipment. In certain circumstances assistance can also be made availabletowards wider business development costs such as feasibility studies and businessplans. Under the new programme £60 million has been allocated to the Food Processingand Marketing Grant Scheme.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 30 October 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 8 November 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive in what respects it considered the NFU Scotland estimates quantifying the need for compensation for farmers in respect of the outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in August 2007 to be deficient.
Answer
While we have considerablesympathy with the case put forward by NFU Scotland requesting funding for Scottishfarmers following the recent outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease, it does not fullyreflect recent developments (such as the reopening of export markets and availabilityof Private Storage Aids for pig meat). We discussed the matter of compensation withthe NFU Scotland and the wider industry, taking into account NFU Scotland estimatesof need. We also took account of funding available to the Scottish Government. Thepackage of measures that I announced on 24 October 2007 provides immediate relief to those most hard pressedas a result of foot-and-mouth disease while supporting the long term viability of the industry.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 26 October 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maureen Watt on 7 November 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-4248 by Fiona Hyslop on 25 September 2007, whether it will give examples of the reports referred to.
Answer
There were such reportsin the Edinburgh Evening News on 14 August 2006, and 31 January, 9 February and 7 March 2007.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 26 October 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maureen Watt on 7 November 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to the second supplementary to question S3F-125 by Alex Salmond on 6 September 2007 (Official Report, c. 1501), whether the phrase “so-called hit list” refers to the programme of school closures contained in Children & Families Estates Review: Rationalisation and Development Programme, approved by the City of Edinburgh Council Executive on 23 August 2007.
Answer
The First Ministerwas reflecting on a general understanding that the possibility of school closures had been underconsideration for some time by the City of Edinburgh Council’s previous administration.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 26 October 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maureen Watt on 6 November 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-4248 by Fiona Hyslop on 25 September 2007, whether any of these reports referred to the existence of a “so-called hit list” of school closures approved by the City of Edinburgh Council Executive prior to May 2007 and, if so, which reports these were and when they were published.
Answer
Press reports, althoughnot using the precise term “so-called hit list”, suggested that the possibilityof school closures was under consideration by the then City of Edinburgh Council administration and mentioned certain specificschools.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 05 October 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 2 November 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive, in light of the decision to abolish the Cabinet Committee on Sustainable Scotland, what formal internal mechanisms exist to ensure that decisions meet the Executive’s five priorities and contribute to the target to cut greenhouse gas emissions by over 3% a year.
Answer
It isthe responsibility of Cabinet, assisted by the Strategic Board, to achieve the overallpurpose and the five strategic objectives set by the Scottish Government. The GreenerScotland strategic objective is supported by a Programme Board, chaired by the DirectorGeneral Environment and reporting directly to the Strategic Board and Cabinet. Thisboard will take responsibility for oversight of the programmes to deliver reductionsin greenhouse gas emissions and other targets of the government.
Our Scottish ClimateChange Bill will set out our proposed targets on emissions, including our headlineaim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80% from 1990 levels by the year 2050,and mandatory annual reporting to provide strong accountability. We aim to launchthe public consultation on proposals for the bill around the turn of the year.
