- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 25 April 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 14 May 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it considers houses in multiple occupation (HMO) quotas to be useful in addressing antisocial behaviour and, if so, whether it considers them to be more effective than the provisions of the Antisocial Behaviour etc. (Scotland) Act 2004.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S3W-12323 on 14 May 2008. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament''s website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa/search.
The national antisocial behaviour strategy, which includes the Antisocial Behaviour etc. (Scotland) Act 2004 and is currently under review, remains the main vehicle for tackling low-level offending.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 25 April 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 14 May 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive what impact it considers that the use of houses in multiple occupation (HMO) quotas has on the affordability of housing to buy and rent.
Answer
The basis of the proposal set out in Scottish Planning Policy 3 “ Planning for Housing (SPP3) is to address planning issues about over-concentrations of HMOs in particular areas. It will be for local authorities to consider whether and how to develop and implement such policies in the wider context of housing need in their area. The consultative draft of SPP3 encourages local authorities to consider the need for HMO accommodation when preparing local housing strategies, and to reflect that in development plans.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 25 April 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 14 May 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has carried out an evaluation of the impact of existing policies limiting the number of houses in multiple occupation (HMO) licences in Glasgow and Edinburgh with the aim of informing Scottish Planning Policy 3: Planning for Housing (SPP 3) and, if so, what the outcomes of the evaluation were.
Answer
Planning and HMO licensing legislation are designed to do different things “ planning is focussed on the availability of services and amenities, while licensing exists to ensure HMO properties meet certain safety, physical and management standards. The review of SPP3 considers planning issues. Both Glasgow City Council and the City of Edinburgh Council have been involved in the SPP3 consultation process, as have all other planning authorities, particularly those where high HMO concentrations exist, such as Fife Council and Dundee City Council. Their views are being taken into account in drafting the final policy.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 25 April 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 14 May 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive what evidence is available to suggest that houses in multiple occupation (HMO) quotas are successful in tackling antisocial behaviour and other local housing problems.
Answer
The proposal set out in Scottish Planning Policy 3 “ Planning for Housing (SPP3) is not intended to tackle antisocial behaviour. Where planning authorities decide to implement a policy on HMO concentrations, they should balance the need to provide adequate numbers of HMO accommodation with the need to safeguard the character, integrity and amenity of communities.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 25 April 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 9 May 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive what evidence is available to suggest that a concentration of houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) would have a negative impact on local amenities.
Answer
We have received a number of representations on the issue of HMO concentrations. Research on the effect of student HMOs on the housing market in St Andrews has been conducted on behalf of the University of St Andrews. Universities UK has published research on the potential effects of high concentrations of HMOs. The research suggests ways in which HMO concentrations may be managed. This information is given in Studentification: A Guide to Opportunities, Challenges and Practice, published by Universities UK in 2006, a copy of which is available in the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (Bib. number 45556). Copies of responses to the consultative draft of Scottish Planning Policy 3 “ Planning for Housing will be made available shortly, and a full analysis report will be published in due course.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 18 April 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Russell on 8 May 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether a person commits an offence if he sets a snare that captures an animal listed in Schedule 3 to the Conservation (Natural Habitats, & c) Regulations 1994, as amended by the Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c) Amendment (Scotland) Regulations 2007, for example a mountain hare, pine marten or polecat.
Answer
In the view of the Scottish Government it is an offence to use a snare to kill or capture an animal listed in Schedule 3 to the Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994, unless this is carried out under licence.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 18 April 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Russell on 8 May 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether a person commits an offence if he sets a snare that captures an animal listed in Schedule 2 to the Conservation (Natural Habitats, & c.) Regulations 1994, as amended by the Conservation (Natural Habitats, & c.) Amendment (Scotland) Regulations 2007, for example a wildcat or common otter.
Answer
It is an offence recklessly or intentionally to kill or capture an animal listed on Schedule 2 to the Conservation (Natural Habitats, & c.) Regulations 1994. Intentional killing or capture of a animal listed on Schedule 2 may be carried out under licence.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 18 April 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Russell on 1 May 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive what advice it gives to sporting estate owners seeking to control mountain hares about a long-term strategy to control louping ill.
Answer
The Scottish Government recognises that it is highly unlikely that louping ill can be completely eradicated. However, a ministerial working group with representation from a wide range of key stakeholder interests, has been set up to look at ways of controlling ticks and the problems which they can create which include the spread of louping ill. The group will assess the scale of the problem and consider possible solutions.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 18 April 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Russell on 1 May 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether, given the unselective nature of snares, it considers that Scottish wildcats are at risk of being caught in such traps.
Answer
Good field craft should minimise the risk of any accidental capture of Scottish wildcats. Should any Scottish wildcat be accidentally caught in a legally compliant snare operated in accordance with industry best practice guidelines, the land manager should be able to release the captured animal unharmed.
- Asked by: Sarah Boyack, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 18 April 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Russell on 1 May 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it requires sporting estate owners seeking to control mountain hares to have a long-term strategy to control louping ill.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not require sporting estates to have a long-term strategy to control louping ill in mountain hares.