- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 03 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 5 March 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the publication of the Natural Capital Market Framework and further to the answer to question S6W-30678 by Mairi Gougeon on 29 October 2024, whether it considers offshore private finance investments as ethical investments under the terms of the Framework.
Answer
The Scottish Government’s Natural Capital Market Framework applies only to investment within Scotland and, where relevant, to governance within the wider UK for UK emissions and impacts.
Responsible private investment in Scotland’s natural capital through the Peatland Code (PC) and the Woodland Carbon Code (WCC) is already supporting our response to the twin crises of climate change and biodiversity loss. The WCC and PC generate high-integrity, independently verified carbon units from woodland creation and peatland restoration respectively. Companies can use these units to support appropriate neutrality or net zero claims on their UK-based carbon emissions.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 31 January 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 28 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government under what grounds people with Huntington’s disease might be refused access to support from (a) general psychiatry and (b) community mental health teams despite their Huntington’s disease specialist and/or clinical lead seeking to refer them to these services.
Answer
The Scottish Government recognises the importance of all people with mental health problems, including those with Huntington disease, getting the right help, at the right time, and in the right place.
The core mental health standards set clear expectations for health boards to ensure referrals to community health teams and psychiatry are equitable, clear and prioritise those most in need. They also require services to reduce barriers to access, provide clear referral criteria, and ensure collaboration between staff and agencies to support individuals with complex conditions like Huntington’s disease.
Decisions on referrals may consider clinical appropriateness and service-specific criteria. Where referrals are declined from general psychiatry or community mental health teams a full explanation should be offered for this decision, and alternative pathways offered wherever possible and appropriate.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 12 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 26 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many procedures the National Specialist Services Committee has signed off (a) in each of the last 10 years and (b) since April 2024.
Answer
The role of the National Specialist Services Committee (NSSC) is not to "sign off" procedures. Instead, it provides oversight and governance for the commissioning of new specialist services and networks, reviews potential decommissioning of existing services and undertake an annual prioritisation process in relation to service business cases for development.
Numbers of prioritised procedures by NSSC are provided below:
a) Prioritisation by NSSC for the last 10 years:
Year | Number of prioritised business cases |
2015 | 5 |
2016 | 5 |
2017 | 2 |
2018 | 8 |
2019 | 9 |
2020 | 5 |
2021 | 4 |
2022 | 5 |
2023 | 4 |
2024 | 8 |
b) Prioritisation since April 2024
Please see above table.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 12 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 20 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how often it meets the National Specialist Services Committee; when it last met the committee, and what was discussed.
Answer
The Scottish Government attend the National Specialist Services Committee (NSSC) who meet quarterly. Apologies were provided for the most recent meeting on 25 November 2024.
Discussions at the 25 November meeting included:
- Finance Update
- Requests for New Designations
- Approved Designations
- De-designations
- Designated Services – Assurance Reporting
- Hyperbaric Medicine
- New Commissions/ Business Cases for Prioritisation - Overview of Business Cases & Scoring Process
- National Planning and Networks Update
- Reviews update
- NSD Highlight Report
- Any Other Business:
- Planning Process
- Implications to new NSSC Governance
- New Governance process for SLAs
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 06 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 20 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to recent research published by the James Hutton Institute, in collaboration with the University of Edinburgh and Forest Research, examining the efficacy of tree planting on carbon capture.
Answer
This report adds to understanding about what can happen early in the process of natural colonisation, when trees established in this way grow relatively slowly. The efficacy of tree planting for carbon capture must also consider their contribution to removing CO2 from the atmosphere and then storing carbon in the longer term.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 06 February 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 20 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what consideration has been given to the potential for soil carbon losses when increasing tree cover with the aim to capture carbon, through its tree planting targets.
Answer
The UK Forestry Standard applies requirements to minimise soil carbon losses when creating new woodlands. No planting is supported in Scotland on soils with peat exceeding 50 cm depth. In addition recently revised guidance for soil cultivation effectively limits ploughing of organic soils of less than 10 cm depth.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 24 January 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 6 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many staff VisitScotland had each December since 2018, broken down by county that they were employed in.
Answer
VisitScotland’s system does not allow point in time reporting required to share location-specific information for staff for each December since 2018.
VisitScotland’s staff numbers at the end of each financial year are reported in its annual accounts as follows:
Date | FTE |
31-03-2018 | 559 |
31-03-2019 | 525 |
31-03-2020 | 518 |
31-03-2021 | 497 |
31-03-2022 | 542 |
31-03-2023 | 492 |
31-03-2024 | 438 |
VisitScotland does not capture staff locations by local authority area. Information on staff locations by iCentre or Regional Economic Partnership area is provided below. This information is only available for the current date.
iCentre staff:
iCentre | FTE |
Aviemore | 2.9 |
Ballater | 2.6 |
Brodick | 0.6 |
Craignure | 3.4 |
Fort William | 3.8 |
Glasgow | 7 |
Inverness | 4.2 |
Kirkwall | 3 |
Portree | 3.8 |
Rothesay | 6.3 |
Office-based staff:
Region (based on Regional Economic Partnerships) | % Spread of staff |
North-East | 3.3 |
Ayrshire | 0.61 |
Edinburgh & South-East | 55.45 |
Forth Valley | 4.55 |
Glasgow | 13.94 |
Highlands & Islands | 11.23 |
South of Scotland | 3.94 |
Tay Cities | 6.97 |
Since the pandemic, VisitScotland has operated a hybrid working policy. For the majority of job vacancies, VisitScotland makes it clear in advertising that roles can be based in any part of Scotland.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 24 January 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 6 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many VisitScotland development managers were in post each December since 2018, and where each was located.
Answer
The following table captures current roles and locations and indicates whether the role has been in place since 2018:
Job Title | Contracted work base (current role-holder) | Role in place since 2018 |
Destination Development Director - Central/North-East – Including Tay Cities | Perth | Yes |
Destination Development Director – Highlands & Islands | Inverness | Yes |
Destination Development Director – South | Glasgow | Yes |
Regional Director - Argyll & the Isles | Oban | Yes |
Regional Director - Glasgow City | Glasgow | Yes |
Regional Director - Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire & Moray Speyside | Aberdeen | Yes |
Regional Director - Edinburgh & Lothians | Perth | Yes |
Regional Director - Ayrshire & Forth Valley | Glasgow | Yes |
Island Manager – Shetland | Lerwick | Yes |
Island Manager - Orkney | Kirkwall | Yes |
Island Manager – Outer Hebrides | Stornoway | Yes |
Over time exact job titles and responsibilities have evolved. VisitScotland’s system does not allow point in time reporting required to share information for each December since 2018.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 24 January 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 6 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many VisitScotland destination development directors were in post each December since 2018, and where each was located.
Answer
The following table captures current roles and locations and indicates whether the role has been in place since 2018:
Job Title | Contracted work base (current role-holder) | Role in place since 2018 |
Destination Development Director - Central/North-East – Including Tay Cities | Perth | Yes |
Destination Development Director – Highlands & Islands | Inverness | Yes |
Destination Development Director – South | Glasgow | Yes |
Regional Director - Argyll & the Isles | Oban | Yes |
Regional Director - Glasgow City | Glasgow | Yes |
Regional Director - Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire & Moray Speyside | Aberdeen | Yes |
Regional Director - Edinburgh & Lothians | Perth | Yes |
Regional Director - Ayrshire & Forth Valley | Glasgow | Yes |
Island Manager – Shetland | Lerwick | Yes |
Island Manager - Orkney | Kirkwall | Yes |
Island Manager – Outer Hebrides | Stornoway | Yes |
Over time exact job titles and responsibilities have evolved. VisitScotland’s system does not allow point in time reporting required to share information for each December since 2018.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 24 January 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 6 February 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what the average spend was of recreational visitors to the Highlands and Islands in each year since 2018.
Answer
Average spend (£) of overnight visitors to Highlands and Islands by year, 2018-2023 |
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
Domestic Visitors | 260 | 252 | - | - | 247 | 247 |
International Visitors | 495 | 418 | - | - | 658 | 640 |
Overall average | 309 | 281 | - | - | 303 | 328 |
Number of overnight visitors to Highlands and Islands by year, 2018-2023 (000s) |
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
Domestic Overnight | 1,997 | 2,805 | - | - | 2,461 | 2,124 |
International | 525 | 591 | - | - | 393 | 555 |
Total Overnight | 2,522 | 3,396 | - | - | 2,854 | 2,679 |
- Highlands and Islands includes the following local authorities: Highland, Orkney Islands, Shetland Islands and Western Isles (aka Outer Hebrides / Eilean Siar).
- Average spend figures are shown in pounds. These figures are nominal and have not been adjusted for inflation.
- There is a break in the time series in 2020 and 2021 due to the COVID19 pandemic so there is no data available for these years.
- The source for domestic overnight figures is the Great Britain Tourism Survey.
- The source for international figures is the International Passenger Survey.