- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 30 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive what happens to any surplus in the Less Favoured Areas Support Scheme budget at the end of a financial year after all outstanding claims have been processed.
Answer
LFASS expenditure in any one year is a function of fixed payments rates and levels of demand in a constant eligible area. The indicative LFASS budget is £61 million a year, and is part of the overall Scotland Rural Development Programme (SRDP) budget. Any variance between LFASS spend and its indicative budget results in correspondingly more or less funds being available for the rest of the SRDP.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 26 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has carried out an economic impact assessment on the proposed fishing quota management and licensing system.
Answer
Along with a standard regulatory impact assessment, a significant amount of additional economic research was carried out to help shape the quota and licensing proposals. This includes research on producer organisations, quota holding and inshore management.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 26 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive what restrictions the proposed fishing quota management and licensing system will place on non-Scottish boats working out of and landing at Scottish ports.
Answer
No restrictions are proposed for non-Scottish boats currently working out of and landing at Scottish ports. Our proposals are designed to ensure no detriment arises to fishermen elsewhere in the UK.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 26 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has carried out a risk assessment on the proposed fishing quota management and licensing system.
Answer
We have undertaken a regulatory impact assessment of our proposals to consider any impacts arising for businesses.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 26 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive what power it has to remove fishing quotas from owners who do not sign up to the proposed fishing quota management and licensing system.
Answer
We are confident that our proposals are both legal and enforceable.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 24 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will publish the legal advice it received when drawing up the proposed fishing quota management and licensing system.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not discuss the nature of any legal advice received, nor indeed whether legal advice has been sought in relation to any matter.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 23 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it can compel Scottish-based fishing boats to join the proposed fishing quota management and licensing system.
Answer
The proposals are for a Scottish quota management and licensing system which will apply to Scottish vessels and quota holders as defined in the consultation document Safeguarding Our Fishing Rights: The Future of Quota Management and Licensing in Scotland - Interim outcome of consultation report.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 23 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it can compel Scottish-based fishing quota owners to join the proposed quota management and licensing system.
Answer
The proposals are for a Scottish quota management and licensing system which will apply to Scottish vessels and quota holders as defined in the consultation document Safeguarding Our Fishing Rights: The Future of Quota Management and Licensing in Scotland - Interim outcome of consultation report.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 05 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 13 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether an analysis of the Devanha consortium was completed in 2008.
Answer
Heriot-Watt University and DTZ were commissioned by the Scottish Government to carry out a monitoring and evaluation study of Devanha to run over the three year period of the programme. It draws on evidence collected through the monitoring and evaluation framework developed by the consultants through discussion with Scottish Government and Devanha partners and stakeholders. Key documents guiding the analysis have been the Offer of Grant from Scottish Ministers to Devanha Limited and the Programme Agreement between the Scottish Government and Devanha Limited. The evaluation will likely lead to a final published report, expected to be in 2011.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 05 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 13 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-19223 by Stewart Maxwell on 21 January 2009, whether the fact that no properties were built by the Devanha consortium in 2005-06 and 2006-07 resulted in an underspend in the Grampian region’s housing programme budget allocation and, if so, to where the surplus was relocated.
Answer
The Devanha Grant Offer was approved in March 2007, and so there were no properties built by the Devanha Consortium in 2005-06 or 2006-07. There was therefore no associated underspend.