To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will report on the outcome of the Agriculture and Fisheries Council held in Brussels on 19 to 20 September 2005.
I attended the Agriculture andFisheries Council in Brussels on 19 and 20 September 2005, together with Margaret Beckett, Ben Bradshaw and Jim Knight.
Two Environment Council matterswere included on the agenda in the absence of a meeting of Environment Ministerswithin the relevant deadlines. These were taken as “B” points at the request ofDenmark. On the first, the Council was unable to act on the Commission’s proposalon a GM maize authorisation due to the absence of a qualified majority in favouror against. On the second, however, the Council did adopt a Decision amending Annex II of Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliamentand of the Council on end-of-life vehicles.
On Agriculture, Poland requested the Commission remove surplus cereal production from the Countriesof Central Europe through the use of free market tenders rather than interventionstorage. Austria suggested that the intervention criteria for grains beadjusted to respond to difficulties caused by bad weather this year. The Czech Republic, Slovakia andHungary supported both requests. The Commission were aware of the serious situationand said they had made every effort within the rules to ease it.
Italy, supported byFrance, Greece, Spain, Poland, Hungary, Cyprus and Portugal, drew the Commission’sattention to the crises in its wine and fruitand vegetables markets, caused by drops in price. They asked for a further increase in the quantity of crisis distillationand called for the Commission to present its proposals on crisis management as soonas possible. The Agriculture Commissioner explained that they were considering options.They were planning a reform of the fresh and processed fruit and vegetables sectorsfor the second half of 2006.
On wine, the Commissioner explainedthat the Management committee of 6 September had given a favourable opinion on the opening of crisis distillation fortable wine in Italy. A reform of the wine CMO would be launched in 2006.
The Czech Republic, supported by Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Cyprus and Slovakia, requested a derogation from the CAP reform regulationwhich would allow them to make payments under the single area payment scheme (SAPS)earlier than 1 December. The Commission explained that there was no legal basisfor an earlier payment date this year, unless in the case of an emergency.
The Commissioner forHealth and Consumer Protection gave an update on the situation on Avian Influenzain south East Asia and Russia and on the actions taken and planned.
The Agriculture Commissionerprovided the Council with an update on the state of play of the World Trade OrganizationNegotiations.
On Fisheries, in a frontloadingexercise ahead of December Council, ministers held an exchange of views on the Presidencydiscussion paper concerning the options and principles for enhancing stock recoverymeasures. Most member states stressed that decisions should only be taken on thebasis of sound and updated science. However, there was a general opinion that closedareas would not be effective in helping cod recovery and that current managementarrangements should be given the chance to work.
Under any other business, theCommission gave a short presentation on methods being considered to help the industrywith high fuel prices. The Commission was against subsidising vessels running costs,but did remind member states that money from the Financial Instrument for FisheriesGuidance could be used to give vessels tie up aid or subsidise the purchase of morefuel efficient gear. In the long-term many member states supported the use of morefuel efficient engines and renewable energy. Member states noted the presentation.