- Asked by: Margo MacDonald, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 05 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 16 January 2003
To ask the Presiding Officer whether a condition of the contract between the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body in relation to the construction of the new Parliament building at Holyrood and EMBT/RMJM Ltd is that the architects have collateral warranties from EMBT Arquitectes and RMJM Scotland Ltd.
Answer
The provision of collateral warranties was not a condition of the contract with EMBT/RMJM and, therefore, such warranties have never been sought or provided.
- Asked by: Margo MacDonald, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 18 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 15 January 2003
To ask the Presiding Officer on what date, or dates, since the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body accepted responsibility for the Holyrood project the specification for blast and bombproofing of (a) the curtain wall and (b) exterior walls was increased, detailing the reasons for such increases and the specific additional benefits gained on each such occasion.
Answer
The detailed specifications of the new Scottish Parliament building conform to Cabinet Office guidelines for a public building of this type. These guidelines, drawn up by the security services, have not changed. Heightened awareness of security issues following recent world events has made it necessary for all those responsible for applying the guidelines to follow them particularly stringently. A number of complex components of the building have been re-designed in order to satisfy the existing guidelines and in some cases it has been only possible to prove compliance conclusively through carrying out blast tests.
- Asked by: Margo MacDonald, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 18 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 15 January 2003
To ask the Presiding Officer on what date, or dates, since the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body accepted responsibility for the Holyrood project, the specification for blast and bombproofing of gla'ed units was increased, detailing the reasons for such increases and the specific additional benefits gained on each such occasion.
Answer
The detailed specifications of the new Scottish Parliament building conform to Cabinet Office guidelines for a public building of this type. These guidelines, drawn up by the security services, have not changed. Heightened awareness of security issues following recent world events has made it necessary for all those responsible for applying the guidelines to follow them particularly stringently. A number of complex components of the building have been re-designed in order to satisfy the existing guidelines and in some cases it has been only possible to prove compliance conclusively through carrying out blast tests.
- Asked by: Margo MacDonald, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 18 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 14 January 2003
To ask the Presiding Officer whether, since the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body accepted responsibility for the Holyrood project, any contractors have left the site voluntarily or had their contract terminated prior to the completion of work required to be undertaken by them; if so, who the contractors were, between what dates the contractors were employed on the site, what the initial cost of the contract was, how much has been paid to them and what payments are outstanding, and what the reasons were for the termination of the contractual obligation.
Answer
Only one trade contract has been terminated before completion of works since the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body (SPCB) took responsibility for the Holyrood Project. The contractor concerned was Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd, who were appointed on 26 January 2001 to undertake the MSP Building Cladding Trade Package. A notice of intention to terminate the contract was issued to Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd on 26 September 2001 on the grounds of breach of contract. The initial contract value was £7,157,281.29. A total of £854,067 was paid to the company for work undertaken. The SPCB does not consider that any further payments are due to Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd.
- Asked by: Margo MacDonald, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 05 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 14 January 2003
To ask the Presiding Officer when the landscape design contract in relation to the construction of the new Parliament building at Holyrood was put out to tender and advertised in the European Journal.
Answer
Landscaping design was included in the design competition for the new Scottish Parliament building, which was won by EMBT/RMJM Limited in July 1998. The advertisement for the competition for the Architectural Design Team appeared in the Official Journal of the European Communities (OJEC) in February 1998 and invitations to tender were issued to short listed candidates in June 1998.
- Asked by: Margo MacDonald, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 18 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 13 January 2003
To ask the Presiding Officer what aspects of the security specifications initially envisaged as being necessary for the new Parliament building at Holyrood, as published on the website of the former Scottish Office, have needed to be amended, detailing the (a) date of, (b) reason for and (c) specific benefits gained by each such revision.
Answer
Since the Parliament assumed responsibility for the Holyrood Project in June 1999, there have been a number of changes to the security section in the Scottish Parliament Building User Brief. For obvious security reasons, details of revisions to that section are treated on a confidential basis, and the information cannot, therefore, be provided as requested. All have had the aim of improving the protection the building offers, however, and enhancing the safety of members, staff and visitors to the Parliament. In particular, changes to the design specification, as supported by the various professional consultants to the project, take advantage of the latest security advice on the practical application of existing guidelines.
- Asked by: Margo MacDonald, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 18 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 13 January 2003
To ask the Presiding Officer whether the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body will place the security specifications initially envisaged as being necessary for the new Parliament building at Holyrood, as published on the website of the former Scottish Office, in the Scottish Parliament's Information Centre and what the reasons are for the position on the matter.
Answer
I understand that an abbreviated version of the April 1998 version of the Parliament Building User Brief appeared on the Scottish Office Devolution website prior to the project transferring to the Parliament in June 1999. A section on general security issues was contained in that document which covered the security arrangements expected in the building. After reconsideration of the current security implications, I am of the view that no security information about the building should be made more generally accessible than absolutely necessary. I therefore cannot recommend that a copy of that information be placed in Scottish Parliament Information Centre. The Holyrood Project Team can make arrangements for individual members, with legitimate interests, to view the User Brief if required.
- Asked by: Margo MacDonald, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 05 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 13 January 2003
To ask the Presiding Officer when the mechanical and electrical design contract in relation to the construction of the new Parliament building at Holyrood was put out to tender and advertised in the European Journal.
Answer
The mechanical and electrical element of the design of the new Scottish Parliament building was part of the design competition, which was won by EMBT/RMJM Limited in July 1998. The advertisement for the competition for the Architectural Design Team was placed in the Official Journal of the European Community (OJEC) in February 1998 and shortlisted candidates were required to come forward with a proposed team, including mechanical and electrical engineers.
- Asked by: Margo MacDonald, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 05 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 10 January 2003
To ask the Presiding Officer whether EMBT/RMJM Ltd provided evidence of its professional indemnity insurance as described in the original European Journal advertisement for architectural services in relation to the construction of the new Parliament building at Holyrood.
Answer
Yes.
- Asked by: Margo MacDonald, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 05 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 18 December 2002
To ask the Presiding Officer how long after the post of planning supervisor in relation to the construction of the new Parliament building at Holyrood was advertised an appointment was made.
Answer
The post of Planning Supervisor for the new Scottish Parliament building project was advertised in the Official Journal of the European Community (OJEC) on 11 February 1998. An appointment was made on 25 June 1998.