- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 26 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 11 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether no worker has faced less favourable terms and conditions as a result of a transfer of undertakings from the public sector to a PPP following the protocol agreed with the Scottish Trades Union Congress in 2002.
Answer
The Executive/STUC staffing protocolhas been implemented as part of the PPP process. I am not aware that any employeehas transferred since the introduction of the protocol.
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 23 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 11 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answers to questions S1W-33537 and S1W-34414 by Mr Jim Wallace on 27 February and 31 March 2003 respectively, whether the Crown Office can provide a record of convictions in relation to offences of violence or other similar category of offences at HM Prison Kilmarnock.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:
As the Crown Office and ProcuratorFiscal Service does not record cases by the locus of the offence, the informationrequested is not available.
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 26 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 11 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, what the cost was of, and how many cells are in, the new houseblocks at (a) HM Prison Edinburgh and (b) HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:
| Establishment | Cost (£ million) | Number of Cells |
| HM Prison Edinburgh | 18 | 224 |
| HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont | 17 | 211 |
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 27 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 11 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what assurances it can give that Scottish Water will be protected from privatisation under the provisions of the draft Water Services Bill, if water is included in the latest round of liberalisation under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS).
Answer
Matters relating to the regulationof international trade, including responsibility for GATS negotiations, are reservedto the UK Government. The Scottish Executive has ensured that the UK Government’s representationsto the European Union on GATS reflect the Executive’s commitment to retain Scotland’spublic water services in the public sector, and the UK Government has confirmed that it has no intentionof pressing for water services to be included in future GATS commitments. Nothingin the GATS process affects the Scottish Executive’s right to determine policy onhow water services are provided in Scotland. The forthcoming Water Services Bill will not affectScottish Water's status as a public corporation.
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 27 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 11 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what analysis it has made of the effects of liberalisation of services under the General Agreement on Trade in Services on its areas of responsibility.
Answer
The regulation of internationaltrade is a reserved matter. The Scottish Executive is in regular contact with theDepartment of Trade and Industry and other Government departments on a range oftrade issues, including those relating to the General Agreement on Trade in Services(GATS).
The Scottish Executive is liaising with the DTI on the progress of the GATS negotiations, and maintainsan ongoing assessment of any potential impact of GATS on its responsibilities. Thiswill continue to inform our discussions with DTI, in order to ensure that Scottishinterests are considered.
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 27 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 11 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what its position is on privatising the water supply.
Answer
The Executive remains fully committedto retaining water supply in the public sector. The Water Services Bill will prohibitthird parties from using the public water and sewerage networks, ensuring that ScottishWater remains the sole physical supplier of water and sewerage services to all premisesconnected to the public networks. This prohibition, together with the prohibitionon retail competition to domestic customers and provisions to license retail competitionfor non-domestic customers will reinforce our commitment to retain Scottish Waterin the public sector.
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 27 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 11 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has made any representations to the European Union on the inclusion of water services in the latest round of liberalisations under the General Agreement on Trade in Services
Answer
Matters relating to the regulationof international trade, including responsibility for GATS negotiations, are reservedto the UK Government. The Scottish Executive has ensured that the UK Government’s representationsto the European Union on GATS reflect the Executive’s commitment to retain Scotland’s publicwater services in the public sector.
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 27 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 11 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what assurances it can give that Scottish Water will remain as a public corporation under the provisions of the draft Water Services Bill.
Answer
The Executive remains committedto retaining Scottish Water as a publicly owned corporation. Scottish Water's statuswill not be affected by the forthcoming Water Services Bill.
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 27 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 11 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what information it has regarding the impact on local authorities of the abolition of feudal tenure.
Answer
Although the Abolition of FeudalTenure etc. (Scotland) Act received Royal Assent in 2000 it will not take effectuntil 28 November 2004. Local authorities will have until November to preservecertain special types of right and even after that they will still be able to preservetheir rights over housing estates where they retain some properties. After the feudalsystem is abolished, local authorities will have to modify their practice when sellingland to take account of the types of title conditions which will be permitted infuture. The process by which authorities may preserve rights over housing estateswas simplified following consultation with authorities when the legislation wasbeing considered.
The Executive wrote to the Chief Executives and principal legal officers of all Scottish local authorities on 7 May 2003, outliningthe main areas of reform and suggesting actions which councils might wish to consider.The Executive will be producing further general guidance on its programme of propertylaw reform later in 2004.
- Asked by: Linda Fabiani, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 27 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 11 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what funds it has made available to local authorities to cover the implications for them of the abolition of feudal tenure.
Answer
No funds have been made available.It is difficult to predict the administrative costs to local authorities arisingfrom the abolition of the feudal system, but it is expected that these can be metfrom existing resources. As with any other individual or corporate body, it is amatter of choice for the local authority as to what, if any, action it wishes totake. The legislation does not require any action generating unavoidable costs forcouncils.
It is unlikely that local authoritieswill have incurred much expense to date, as the feudal system will not actuallybe abolished until 28 November 2004. It is currently possible for authorities to registernotices in the property registers in order to save certain types of feudal rightand authorities have been advised of the best way to ensure that they will retaina say in relation to housing complexes where they still own some of the properties.It is not anticipated that authorities will wish to use a large number of notices,and so the registration costs should not prove to be significant.