- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 29 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mary Mulligan on 10 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what monitoring has taken place of the operation of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 (Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation) Order 2000.
Answer
The Scottish Executive collects annual statistics from local authorities on the following aspects of the mandatory licensing scheme:
- number of applications received, refused, granted, revoked or suspended during the year, by types of Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO);
- number of applications pending at 31 March, by types of HMO;
- total number of licenses in force at 31 March, by type of HMO and by number of occupants;
- reasons for refusals for licences, and
- licensing fees and fee structure.
The resulting figures have been published in the Scottish Executive's Statistical Bulletin,
Housing Trends in Scotland. The relevant issues, which are available in the Parliament's Reference Centre, are for quarters ending 31 December 2001 and 31 March 2002 (Bib. number 23303) and quarter ending 31 March 2001 (Bib. number 16396).The Executive also commissioned independent research,
A Review of the First Year of Mandatory Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation in Scotland, by Hector Currie, and officials keep in touch with current issues and developments through attending the meetings of the Scottish HMO Network Group of local authority officers.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 29 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Margaret Curran on 10 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 (Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation) Order 2000 is compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.
Answer
The Scottish Executive considers that the provisions of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 (Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation) Order 2000 are compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 27 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 10 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will now review the law regarding the detention of those suffering from personality disorders that place the public at risk but do not currently justify statutory detention and what consideration it will give to introducing new statutory measures in respect of this matter.
Answer
The law relating to the detention of persons suffering from personality disorders was recently reviewed as part of the work of the Millan and McLean Committees. Their recommendations informed the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2003 and the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003, which received Royal Assent in March and April respectively this year and will come into force in due course. Given this, we see no benefit in a further review at this time. The operation of the new legislation will clearly be very closely monitored.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 28 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 10 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-22838 by Ross Finnie on 21 February 2002, how many prosecutions there have been for litter and fly-tipping offences in each year since 2000, broken down by local authority.
Answer
The available information, which relates to all offences categorised as litter offences under the Scottish Executive Justice Department's classification of crimes and offences, is given in the following table. The data for 2002 are expected to be published in the autumn of 2003.Persons Proceeded Against in Scottish Courts Where the Main Offence was a Litter Offence, by Local Authority, 2000 and 2001
Local Authority | 2000 | 2001 |
Angus | 2 | 5 |
Argyll and Bute | 1 | - |
City of Edinburgh | - | 1 |
Dumfries and Galloway | 1 | - |
Dundee City | 3 | 3 |
East Ayrshire | - | 2 |
East Dunbartonshire | 1 | - |
Falkirk | - | 1 |
Glasgow City | 1 | 4 |
Highland | - | 2 |
Inverclyde | 1 | 1 |
North Ayrshire | - | 1 |
North Lanarkshire | 2 | 3 |
South Ayrshire | - | 2 |
South Lanarkshire | 1 | 2 |
West Dunbartonshire | 1 | - |
Total | 14 | 27 |
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 28 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 10 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-33327 by Ross Finnie on 31 January 2003, what monitoring is in place regarding the effectiveness of local authorities' use of the #3 million committed to litter reduction schemes.
Answer
It is for the local authorities to monitor the success of the specific schemes they propose for Quality of Life funding. However, the Scottish Executive has provided £150,000 to Keep Scotland Beautiful to develop, with all local authorities in Scotland, performance indicators for the standard of cleanliness of streets and pavements.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 28 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 10 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-30208 by Ross Finnie on 16 October 2002, whether any further local authorities have now adopted formal litter plans.
Answer
No further local authorities have adopted formal litter plans since my response to question S1W-30208. The decision on whether to adopt a litter plan is one for the individual local authority.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 27 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 10 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what consideration it will give to amending the law on the registration and/or monitoring of sex offenders in order to include retrospective provisions.
Answer
The Scottish Executive and the Home Office jointly reviewed the Sex Offenders Act in 2000 and published the results in July 2001. That review concluded that there was no viable way of extending the act to offenders convicted before the legislation came into force, beyond the limited retrospection with respect to those serving relevant sentences on 1 September 1997.There are measures, however, to protect the public from sex offenders who have completed their sentences prior to 1997 but who continue to display risky behaviour. Chief constables can, for example, apply for a Sex Offender Order, which triggers notification and can place prohibitions on the individual.A number of changes to strengthen the existing sex offenders' regime are contained in the Sexual Offences Bill currently before the UK Parliament. No further changes to the retrospective element of the legislation are planned.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 28 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 10 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-5188 by Mr Jim Wallace on 23 March 2000, how many prosecutions have taken place under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 in each year since 1998, in how many cases charges were proved and how much was levied in fines.
Answer
The available information is given in the following table. The data for 2002 are not expected to be available until the autumn of 2003.Prosecutions and Fines Imposed for Offences Under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (as Main Offence), Scotland, 1998-2001
| 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 |
All Offences1 |
Number of Prosecutions | 55 | 44 | 24 | 34 |
Number with Charge Proved | 53 | 36 | 20 | 32 |
Total Amount of Fines Imposed (£) | 18,705 | 6,740 | 16,480 | 12,080 |
Offences Classified as Litter Offences2 |
Number of Prosecutions | 41 | 30 | 14 | 27 |
Number with Charge Proved | 39 | 23 | 11 | 26 |
Total Amount of Fines Imposed (£) | 1,940 | 1,190 | 7,990 | 3,680 |
Notes:1. Excludes a small number of cases where the charge information available is not sufficiently detailed to identify the offence as being under the 1990 act.2. Under the Scottish Executive Justice Department classification of crimes and offences.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 28 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 10 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1O-4393 by Mr Jim Wallace on 10 January 2002, how many people have been charged with litter offences in each year since 2000.
Answer
In 2000 and 2001, 14 and 27 persons respectively were proceeded against in Scottish Courts where the main offence was categorised as a litter offence under the Scottish Executive Justice Department's classification of crimes and offences. The data for 2002 are not expected to be available until the autumn of 2003.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 27 May 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Euan Robson on 9 June 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what concerns it has following the recommendation of the report by Ms Anne Black of 25 April 2003 that no disciplinary proceedings should take place in respect of Scottish Borders Council social work department following the "Miss X" case and what powers it has to intervene in the matter and request to see the report.
Answer
The Executive has had sight of the three independent reports commissioned by Scottish Borders Council in respect of the "Miss X" case. The latest of these is the report written by Ms Anne Black, which was received by the Executive on 29 May 2003. I have asked the Chief Social Work Inspector to examine the documents and report back to me.