- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 April 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 8 May 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive what discussions it has had with Her Majesty’s Government in respect of whether the Wilson Doctrine has been extended to cover MSPs and, if the convention does not apply to MSPs, whether it will be extended to do so.
Answer
The Wilson Doctrine is a matterfor the Prime Minister.
Authority to authorise interceptionof communications for persons located in Scotland, for the purpose of preventingor detecting serious crime, has been transferred to Scottish ministers but the relevantlegislation, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA), is reservedto Westminster.
Section 65 of RIPA provides forany person who is aggrieved by any conduct to which the Act applies to complainto the independent Investigatory Powers Tribunal if they believe that the conducttook place in relation to them or their property in challengeable circumstances.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 April 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 8 May 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-24499 by Cathy Jamieson on 13 April 2006, when it is appropriate to comment on operational matters relating to the Security and Intelligence Service.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S2W-25269 on 8 May 2006. All answers to writtenparliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website the search facilityfor which can be found at
www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 April 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 8 May 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive how many covert surveillance operations have been carried out by any relevant authority, current or historic, on MSPs since 1999.
Answer
Information relating to the useof covert surveillance by relevant authorities would, if held by the Scottish Executive,be exempt by virtue of sections 31 (National Security) and 35 (Law Enforcement)of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002. We believe it would be contraryto the public interest, to confirm whether or not any such information exists oris held by the Scottish Executive. The terms of this refusal are provided for bysection 18 (1) of the 2002 act.
As stated in my answer to questionS2W-21758 on 18 January 2006, the Chief Surveillance Commissioner publishes detailsin his annual report of the number of authorisations given under the Police Act1997 for property interference, and the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Scotland) Act2000 and Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 for directed and intrusivesurveillance.
The most recent report – Bib.number 37809, document number SE/2005/203 – was laid before the Scottish Parliamenton 3 November 2005.
All answers to writtenparliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website the search facilityfor which can be found at
www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 April 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 8 May 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive what powers it has to counter any potential threat to undermine parliamentary democracy in Scotland by (a) senior British military officers and (b) the British Security Service in light of recent reported allegations anent plans to undermine the Wilson government in the 1960s.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S2W-25269 on 8 May 2006. All answers to written parliamentary questions are availableon the Parliament’s website the search facility for which can be found at
www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 April 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 8 May 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-24499 by Cathy Jamieson on 13 April 2006, whether it is in the public interest to know whether Scottish ministers are aware of any potential subversive activity to undermine the democracy of Scotland by (a) senior British military officers and (b) the British Security Service.
Answer
The Security Service, SecretIntelligence Service, Government Communications Headquarters and the armed forcesare all subject to the rule of law. Evidence of criminal offences committed by membersof these organisations is subject to investigation and prosecution in line withestablished procedures.
The practice of not commentingon operational matters related to the Security and Intelligence Services, as referredto in my answer to S2W-24499, exists because it has been deemed in the public interestnot to risk jeopardising the work carried out by these organisations by revealing,even inadvertently, potentially sensitive information or investigative techniques.
All answers to writtenparliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website the search facilityfor which can be found at
www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 April 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 8 May 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-24499 by Cathy Jamieson on 13 April 2006, when the established practice of not commenting on operational matters related to the Security and Intelligence Service began.
Answer
The functions of the SecurityService, Secret Intelligence Service and Government Communications Headquartersare reserved. It has been established practice for the Scottish Executive not tocomment on operational matters relating to these organisations since the Executive’sinception in 1999.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 April 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 5 May 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-23411 by Tavish Scott on 6 March 2006, whether it will now hold discussions with NHS boards regarding extending the nationwide concessionary fare scheme to community transport schemes utilised by hospitals.
Answer
The Scotland-wide Free Bus Schemefor Older and Disabled People fully meets our commitment to extend concessionarytravel for people in the groups concerned. It is a major achievement under which over a million older anddisabled people can travel free on buses throughout Scotland at anytime of day. The first two years of operation will be critical in building up theevidence base for future analysis of the scheme. We will be happy to use this evidenceto look at where issues emerge and review the scheme in light of our experience.Meantime, we have no current plans to extend the scheme and therefore no plans to hold discussions with NHS boards.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 April 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 5 May 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, in light of Scottish Enterprise’s reported overspend of £30 million in 2005-06, what economic development projects in the Scottish Borders the Executive would wish to see continued.
Answer
Discussions continue with ScottishEnterprise on its budget and operating plan. However, it will continue to be forScottish Enterprise to make detailed budget allocations at local level. In allocatingits budget, Scottish Enterprise must take into account the strategic guidance providedby the Executive.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 April 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 5 May 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive how many people have been entitled to local authority “companion cards” allowing a companion to travel free with them in each year since 1999, broken down by local authority area.
Answer
Seven of the 16 local concessionarytravel schemes included arrangements which enabled eligible people to travel witha companion either free or at a discounted rate. The schemes were the responsibilityof local authorities and information is notheld centrally on the number of people which were entitled to local authority companioncards.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 April 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 5 May 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive who is entitled to a “companion card” allowing a companion to travel free with them under the national concessionary fare scheme.
Answer
Under the Scotland-wide FreeBus Scheme for Older and Disabled People, people who are eligible for the Schemeand who require assistance to travel are entitled to a companion travelling free.The criteria which apply are as follows.
People are entitled to a companiontravelling free if they:
(i) receive the higher or middlerate of the care component of disability living allowance;
(ii) receive attendance allowance;
(iii) live in a residential homeor hospital and are eligible for (i) or (ii), or
(iv) have been certified as blindand in consequence are registered as blind.