- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 25 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 4 April 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has considered any reforms or changes to the fatal accident inquiry system, and what the reasons are for its position on this matter.
Answer
The Scottish Government has acknowledged that there are concerns about the operation of the FAI system. In January of this year, following publication of the determination of the FAI into the deaths of Katie Allen and William Brown at Polmont Young Offenders Institute, the Scottish Government announced a focussed, independent review of the FAI system. This review is to look at the efficiency, effectiveness and trauma-informed nature of investigations into deaths in prison custody.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Allan on 2 April 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to its engagement with the UK Government on proposed reforms to electricity infrastructure consenting in Scotland, how many requests for variations to section 37 consents were received in each of the last five years, and whether it will provide the data that informed its proposal to prescribe a clear statutory process for these variations.
Answer
Legislation does not currently allow for variations to section 37 consents. Therefore, it has not been possible for the Scottish Government to receive such requests.
The proposed reforms mirror section 36C of the Electricity Act 1989 which makes provision for the Scottish Ministers to vary section 36 consents for construction, operation and extension of generating stations.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 27 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 1 April 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it maintains a central register of recommendations made by sheriffs in fatal accident inquiry determinations, and, if so, how it ensures that these recommendations are tracked and reviewed.
Answer
Determinations, recommendations and the response(s) to those recommendations from the body at which they were aimed are published on the website of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service and are publicly available. The Scottish Government expects that the individual policy area or public body at which the recommendations were aimed would take action in light of any repeated recommendations.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 25 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 1 April 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the recently reported concerns raised by an MSP about Scottish Parliamentary Pension Scheme investments in Tesla shares, whether it (a) has undertaken a review of its ownership of Tesla vehicles and (b) will sell its fleet of 10 Tesla cars.
Answer
We have not undertaken a review of ownership, but in line with all fleet vehicles, replacement will be considered when the Tesla’s reach the end of their operational life cycle.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Allan on 1 April 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to its engagement with the UK Government on proposed reforms to electricity infrastructure consenting in Scotland, how it will address reported concerns that statutory consultees may be placed under additional pressure from new time limits, potentially weakening their ability to provide robust input into proposed developments.
Answer
It continues to be critical that statutory consultees need to be adequately resourced and have a skilled workforce to carry out their responsibilities. The Scottish Government will engage and work closely with these bodies as it develops proposals for secondary legislation.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Allan on 1 April 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to its engagement with the UK Government on proposed reforms to electricity infrastructure consenting in Scotland, how many electricity consents it has suspended, revoked or corrected in each of the last five years, and how it took account of any concerns about investor and community uncertainty in proposing to expand its powers to vary consents without an application.
Answer
Legislation does not currently allow for modifications, suspensions or revocations consents when errors in consents are found. Should any issues arise, an applicant must apply for a section 36 consent variation and go through the full variation process, including payment of a fee.
The number of section 36 variation applications consented in the past 5 years are as follows:
2024 – 5
2023 – 5
2022 – 4
2021 – 6
2020 – 1
I also refer the member to the answer to question S6W-35884 on 1 April 2025. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Allan on 1 April 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to its engagement with the UK Government on proposed reforms to electricity infrastructure consenting in Scotland, what its response is to the reported suggestion that accelerating the end-to-end electricity consenting process risks undermining thorough scrutiny of environmental impacts.
Answer
The proposed reforms are about making the determination process more efficient – not making it easier for projects to get consent or undermining thorough scrutiny of environmental impacts. Decisions will continue to be taken by Scottish Ministers on a case-by-case basis, weighing the impacts and benefits of each development.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Allan on 1 April 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to its engagement with the UK Government on proposed reforms to electricity infrastructure consenting in Scotland, what its response is to reported criticisms that replacing automatic public inquiries with an “examination” process in cases where local authorities object may diminish local accountability in decision making.
Answer
Where a planning authority objects to an application made under the Electricity Act 1989 and that objection is not withdrawn, the Scottish Ministers must appoint a reporter to examine the application. Before determining whether to give consent, the Scottish Ministers must consider the objection and the reporter’s report.
The proposed reforms will instead introduce a more proportionate approach, tailored to individual development proposals and the circumstances relating to objections. This would align with established planning appeals processes in Scotland, and reduce the time taken to determine applications.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Allan on 1 April 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to its engagement with the UK Government on proposed reforms to electricity infrastructure consenting in Scotland, how it plans to respond to reported objections that introducing new fees for pre-application functions and necessary wayleaves could disadvantage smaller developers or community-led projects, and what steps it will take to ensure transparency around how any such fees are used.
Answer
The proposed reforms will apply to applications for consent under section 36 and section 37 of the Electricity Act 1989 made to Scottish Ministers. Section 36 applications made to Scottish Ministers have a capacity of over 50MW. Therefore, it is not anticipated that the reforms will disadvantage smaller developers or community-led projects.
The costs of providing pre-application services and processing necessary wayleaves are currently paid for through the Scottish Budget. These new powers will allow the Scottish Government to set fees to recover these costs from service users. The standard approach to setting fee levels will be full cost recovery in accordance with guidance set out in the Scottish Public Finance Manual and the introduction of these new fees will all be subject to consultation.
- Asked by: Douglas Lumsden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 March 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Allan on 1 April 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to its engagement with the UK Government on proposed reforms to electricity infrastructure consenting in Scotland, what data it reviewed on how introducing fees for necessary wayleaves and pre-application services might affect smaller community-led developments, and whether it will publish any analysis that it used to inform this proposal.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-35885 on 1 April 2025. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers