- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 03 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 11 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason only 56.7% of inpatient or day case treatments were completed within 12 weeks of referral during the quarter ending March 2025.
Answer
We must recognise that our health service has experienced unprecedented pressures over the past few years, including pandemic backlogs, staff shortages and the most difficult winter the NHS has ever faced, with the pausing of all non-emergency treatment inevitably leading to planned care delays and an increase in waiting times.
We have remobilised services but understand that activity levels are still lower than we would wish them to be. Patients requiring urgent care, including cancer treatment, are being prioritised. The Scottish Government remains committed to delivering reductions in waiting times.
Our Budget will provide a record £21.7 billion for health and social care. More than £106 million has been allocated to health boards to help tackle the longest waits for procedures and operations.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 03 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 11 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what immediate steps are being taken to reduce the number of patients who have been waiting for over two years for an outpatient appointment.
Answer
We want patients to be treated as soon as possible. However, we know many are facing unacceptable waits and we are determined to do more. That is why we are targeting an additional £200 million to reduce waits and enhance capacity. Funding of £106m has already been agreed with Boards to improve waiting times during 2025-26.
We are also looking to optimise the full force of the £21.7 billion committed through the Scottish Budget to health and social care to improve performance.
We will continue to target resources to reduce waiting times, particularly for those waiting longest for treatment, through maximising productivity and additional resources.
This is all part of our programme to drive up productivity and tackle waiting lists, supported by the Centre for Sustainable Delivery. Together, our actions will further enable NHS Scotland to maximise capacity, build greater resilience and deliver reductions in the number of patients who have waited too long for treatment.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 30 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kate Forbes on 11 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what value-for-money assessments it has carried out in relation to public inquiries since 2007.
Answer
The Finance and Public Administration Committee is currently conducting an inquiry into the cost effectiveness of Scottish Public Inquiries. I wrote to the Committee on 30 May 2025 providing a detailed response to their request for information from Scottish Government in relation to its role as sponsor of current and previous public inquiries. This response noted that Section 17 of the Inquiries Act 2005 confers responsibility for the procedure and conduct of an inquiry on its Chair, independent of Ministers, and that this includes a statutory requirement for a Chair to act 'with regard to the need to avoid any unnecessary cost (whether to public funds or to witnesses or others)'.
Assessment of value for money would therefore be a matter for a Chair of an inquiry to consider as they deem appropriate within the overall duty to avoid unnecessary cost, and those inquiries which are currently ongoing have responded independently to the call for evidence received from the Committee on costs. Responses are published on the Committee pages of the Scottish Parliament website.
The findings and conclusions of the Committee's inquiry will be considered once known.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 03 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 10 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the detailed Project Willow report by EY-Parthenon, what its
position is on whether it is feasible to use approximately 240,000 hectares of
agricultural land for the production of cover crops for Project 6 (HEFA), as
set out at page 124, and, if it considers it to be feasible, whether it has any
concerns regarding competition with food production.
Answer
The Scottish Government is taking forward work to assess and further understand the policy recommendations set out in Project Willow. When available, we will update parliament of our conclusions.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 03 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 10 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the detailed Project Willow report by EY-Parthenon, what Government
decisions that are to be made before the end of 2025 in respect of Project (a)
5, (b) 6, (c) 7, (d) 8 and (e) 9 are being referred to at page 44.
Answer
The Scottish Government is working with developers and investors alongside Scottish Enterprise as part of the Investment Taskforce to identify any barriers to the deployment of projects at Grangemouth, including near term funding challenges as well as longer term policy challenges.
We will take action to support the build out of projects aligned to Project Willow where appropriate.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 03 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 10 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the statement at page 21 of the detailed Project Willow report by
EY-Parthenon that "across all scenarios, the direct GVA impact in total
across projects is negative", how it plans to keep the nine projects
identified in the Project Willow report operational.
Answer
The Scottish Enterprise and UK Office for Investment have established the Grangemouth Investor taskforce which is focussed on identifying and attracting investment in the proposals outlined in Project Willow, with a particular focus on opportunities that the Grangemouth Just Transition Fund could support to ensure they become market investible.
The Scottish Government is not the developer nor owner of any of the nine potential projects suggested through Project Willow. The responsibility for assessing the commercial viability of a project rests solely with the project developers.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 03 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 10 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the detailed Project Willow report by EY-Parthenon, in what year
the number of total jobs in operational phase (including direct, indirect and
induced impacts) falls to zero in the (a) Base Case, (b) Growth Case and (c)
Full Potential scenario, as set out at page 203.
Answer
Our immediate priority is to capitalise on the near term opportunities set out in Project Willow, with a focus on bringing forward new jobs at Grangemouth as quickly as possible. The Grangemouth investment taskforce is delivering on this priority by working with businesses with an interest in developing projects aligned to those suggested in Project Willow.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 02 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 10 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason For Women Scotland was reportedly only offered a brief 15-minute meeting with the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice, following the Supreme Court ruling on For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers.
Answer
A number of stakeholders with an interest in the outcome of the court case were offered 15-minute meetings with myself immediately following the ruling. For Women Scotland declined a meeting at that time. They subsequently attended a meeting with myself on 22 May for a 45-minute meeting. For Women Scotland have also subsequently met with officials.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 02 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 10 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the detailed Project Willow report by EY-Parthenon, how it plans to address the skills-related risks associated with the construction and operation of the Grangemouth site, as set out at page 184.
Answer
The Scottish Government recognises the importance of skills provision to realising the potential of Project Willow, and to securing an industrial future for Grangemouth more widely. We are prioritising skills development through the Grangemouth Just Transition Plan which will be published shortly.
This complements the support the Scottish Government is providing to Grangemouth refinery workers to retrain into in-demand industries, including those associated with Project Willow.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 02 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 10 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what wholesale power market price reforms it plans to introduce, in light of the recommendations in the Project Willow report.
Answer
The power to undertake reforms to the wholesale market is reserved to the UK Government.
The Scottish Government has been consistently been clear with successive UK Governments, NESO, Ofgem and industry that reforms must reduce costs for Scottish consumers, ensure our communities feel the benefit of the energy transition, protect investment in our renewables industry and support decarbonisation.
The Scottish Government is clear that the current wholesale electricity market is not fit for the delivery of our net zero ambitions, nor our aims to tackle fuel poverty.