- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 05 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 18 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason £297,500 was provided to Glasgow North West Citizen Advice Service between 2017-18 and 2020-21 as part of the Promoting Equality and Cohesion Fund; what this funding was used for, and what the outcomes were of the Equalities Project.
Answer
The Promoting Equality and Cohesion Fund initially ran from 2017 to 2020, and was then extended to October 2021 due to the impacts of covid-19. It was superseded by a revised funding programme: the current Equality and Human Rights Fund.
The Promoting Equality and Cohesion Fund was used to fund projects that would contribute to one or more of four outcomes:
- Discrimination against people who share protected characteristics is reduced and multiple discrimination is addressed so that barriers to participation are reduced.
- People covered by hate crime legislation experience lower levels of hate crime.
- People and communities are supported to participate in and engage with services and civic society; their contribution is recognised, and community cohesion is increased.
- Current imbalances in representation in all aspects and levels of public life, including education and employment are addressed to better reflect our communities
The Equalities Project was funded to enable Maryhill and Possilpark Citizens Advice Bureau to broaden volunteering opportunities for protected characteristics individuals to increase confidence, skills/knowledge, aspirations, and community cohesion by ensuring equal participation and representation in public life. Volunteers with the CAB would gain workplace experience to access paid employment and/or further education/training. It was intended that the CAB would continue to strengthen its partnerships with local equality organisations and Glasgow CABx to address the needs of protected characteristics individuals.
The specific outcomes to be achieved were:
- People from equalities groups have increased access to quality advice and information services and are enabled to inform service design and delivery.
- People from across the protected characteristics will have increased opportunities to access quality volunteering opportunities, training and support which will increase their skills, knowledge and experience to enhance employability and representation in public life.
The Fund was managed on a day to day basis on the Scottish Government’s behalf by Impact Funding Partners initially and then Inspiring Scotland. You can find a Final Progress Update report for the Fund summarising its impacts here: Promoting-Equality-and-Cohesion-Fund-Final-Report-Jan-Sep-2021-for-SG-publication.pdf
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 05 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 18 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason £102,000 was provided to Hidden Gardens between 2017-18 and 2020-21 as part of the Promoting Equality and Cohesion Fund; what this funding was used for, and what the outcomes were of the Community Development and Cultural Programme project.
Answer
The Promoting Equality and Cohesion Fund initially ran from 2017 to 2020, and was then extended to October 2021 due to the impacts of covid-19. It was superseded by a revised funding programme: the current Equality and Human Rights Fund.
The Promoting Equality and Cohesion Fund was used to fund projects that would contribute to one or more of four outcomes:
- Discrimination against people who share protected characteristics is reduced and multiple discrimination is addressed so that barriers to participation are reduced.
- People covered by hate crime legislation experience lower levels of hate crime.
- People and communities are supported to participate in and engage with services and civic society; their contribution is recognised, and community cohesion is increased.
- Current imbalances in representation in all aspects and levels of public life, including education and employment are addressed to better reflect our communities
The Community Development and Cultural Programme project was funded to support creation of new, and development of existing projects within Hidden Gardens’ Community Development & Cultural Programme, for people with protected characteristics to: engage in intercultural dialogue; learn skills; reduce inequality; increase resilience and promote community cohesion & societal engagement.
The specific outcomes to be achieved were:
- To deepen connection between peoples of all cultures, faiths, backgrounds and abilities - this outcome underpins everything we do at the Hidden Gardens. Through engaging in shared activities, people will have an understanding and appreciation of other cultures, faiths, backgrounds and abilities, thereby developing safe and stable relationships between communities.
- Improve Learning and Participation, thereby reducing disadvantage and inequality in public life
The Fund was managed on a day to day basis on the Scottish Government’s behalf by Impact Funding Partners initially and then Inspiring Scotland. You can find a Final Progress Update report for the Fund summarising its impacts here: Promoting-Equality-and-Cohesion-Fund-Final-Report-Jan-Sep-2021-for-SG-publication.pdf
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 18 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what funding it has provided directly to each local authority, via grants or other funding, for the purpose of supporting the Regional Improvement Collaboratives (RICs) in each of the last five financial years.
Answer
Following a review of the impact of the Regional Improvement Collaboratives, I confirmed to Parliament in 2023 that funding would be tapered in 2024-25 and repurposed thereafter, including to support the establishment of the Centre for Teaching Excellence.
The following table shows funding that has been provided to support the work of each Regional Improvement Collaborative (RIC), in each of the last five financial years:
Regional Improvement Collaborative | 2020-21 | 2021-22 | 2022-23 | 2023-24 | 2024-25 |
Forth Valley and West Lothian Collaborative | £568,488.00 | £888,800.00 | £888,800.00 | £888,800.00 | £441,900.00 |
The Northern Alliance | £890,633.34 | £1,048,808.00 | £1,039,383.89 | £915,608.00 | £521,904.00 |
The South East Improvement Collaborative | £708,712.00 | £1,171,746.00 | £1,171,746.00 | £1,171,746.00 | £583,372.97 |
The South West Educational Improvement Collaborative | £324,321.00 | £548,221.00 | £528,720.90 | £548,221.06 | £271,610.50 |
The Tayside Regional Improvement Collaborative | £446,302.00 | £680,359.00 | £758,346.00 | £752,686.77 | £392,713.00 |
The West Partnership | £930,637.00 | £1,515,500.00 | £1,515,500.00 | £1,515,500.00 | £755,250.00 |
The following table shows funding that has been provided directly to each local authority, via grants, for the purpose of supporting the Regional Improvement Collaboratives (RICs) in each of the last five financial years. Grant funding was provided to lead local authorities for each RIC and any onward distribution of funds to other local authorities was managed by each RIC.
Local Authority | 2020-21 | 2021-22 | 2022-23 | 2023-24 | 2024-25 |
Clackmannanshire Council | £568,488.00 | £888,800.00 | £888,800.00 | £888,800.00 | £441,900.00 |
Shetland Islands Council | £890,633.34 | £1,048,808.00 | £1,039,383.89 | £915,608.00 | £521,904.00 |
Fife Council | £708,712.00 | £92,929.00 | | | |
Midlothian Council | | £1,078,817.00 | £1,171,746.00 | £1,171,746.00 | £583,372.97 |
South Ayrshire Council | £324,321.00 | | | | |
Dumfries & Galloway Council | | £548,221.00 | £528,720.90 | £187,574.17 | |
East Ayrshire Council | | | | £360,646.89 | £271,610.50 |
Perth & Kinross Council | £446,302.00 | | | | |
Dundee City Council | | £680,359.00 | £758,346.00 | £752,686.77 | £392,713.00 |
Glasgow City Council | £930,637.00 | £1,515,500.00 | £1,515,500.00 | £1,515,500.00 | £755,250.00 |
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 10 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 17 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether small developers will be exempt from the proposed building safety levy.
Answer
A study by the Competition and Markets Authority on the housebuilding industry noted that small and medium housebuilders face higher costs, in per-plot terms, than larger competitors, due to the small-scale nature of their developments. The Scottish Government recognises that this could lead to smaller developers being disproportionately impacted by the introduction of the Scottish Building Safety Levy.
The Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill, therefore, includes provisions for an annual allowance of housing units that are to be levy-free, which will apply over and above exemptions for social and affordable housing, and island developments. This will mean that developers who are building annual numbers of new homes below the threshold will be fully protected from the costs associated with the Levy.
The threshold for the allowance will be set in regulations. We are committed to setting the threshold in a way that is fair, balanced, and that provides certainty for industry. The Scottish Government will work with residential property developers and other industry stakeholders throughout the passage of the Bill to inform the final decision on where the threshold should be set.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 10 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 17 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many specialist neonatal cots will be removed from hospitals in the Central Belt as a result of the proposed redesign of neonatal services.
Answer
Scottish Government commissioned Consulting firm RSM-UK to undertake detailed modelling work to fully map the capacity requirements across the system to inform capacity building and implementation of the new model. The report looked at current establishment and expected additional workload and describes a required increase of 10 cots at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 4 cots at Edinburgh Royal Infirmary and one cot at Aberdeen Maternity Hospital,
We are working with Regional Planning Chief Executives to plan and deliver this service change, informed by the testing that has been underway since 2018 in Ayrshire and Fife, and supported by SG funding of over £6m since 2019.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 10 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 17 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how many diagnostic appointments have been cancelled due to staff shortages in each of the last three years.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not hold this information. More detailed information on cancelled appointments will be held locally by NHS boards.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 17 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what criteria were used in the reported decision not to include two NHS Scotland surgeons on its task and finish group for making recommendations on improving abortion care.
Answer
The Task and Finish Group was established by the Scottish Government and NHS Scotland Planning and Delivery Board. In line with other Task and Finish Groups, NHS Board regional lead Chief Executives were asked to nominate regional representatives with a range of experience to sit on this Group. Therefore the Scottish Government was not directly involved in determining who should join the Group.
However, the Scottish Government expects that the Group members will engage with a range of staff in their region and other stakeholders where appropriate. Task and Finish groups may create subgroups of the main group, including inviting clinicians with specific training and/or experience, where they require specific clinical expertise or knowledge to help inform the final model.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 17 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government how it ensures that there is expert clinical representation on any of its panels tasked with making recommendations on abortion services.
Answer
The Scottish Government values the input of clinicians in informing any recommendations regarding abortion services. The Scottish Government works closely with services through the Scottish Abortion Care Providers network in particular to identify contributors with suitable clinical backgrounds to be involved in any groups convened by the Scottish Government regarding abortion services.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 17 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what funding it has allocated since 2021 to improve stroke services, and for what reason night-time care reportedly remains unavailable.
Answer
The Scottish Government has provided specific funding to NHS Boards for the development of a thrombectomy service to treat ischaemic stroke: £6.6 million in 2021-22; £7.2 million in 2022-23; £10.1 million in 2023-24 and £12.1 million in 2024-25. 2025-26 thrombectomy funding allocations will exceed the funding provided in 2024-25.
In addition, the Scottish Government has provided funding to support the delivery of the Stroke Improvement Plan and wider stroke improvement work: £182,980 in 2021-22; £174,489 in 2022-23; £185,507 in 2023-24 and £175,150 in 2024-25.
While we know thrombectomy procedures are not currently available overnight, stroke care is available and we expect NHS Boards to provide safe, effective and person-centred care for those who have experienced a stroke, at all times.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 17 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it owns the site of the former Carnbroe Mains Farm at Carnbroe Road, Shirrel, Bellshill, and, if (a) so, what its current plans are for the site and (b) not, for what reason the Scottish Vacant and Derelict Land Survey site register states that it does.
Answer
It has been confirmed via title search that the site of the former Carnbroe Mains Farm at Carnbroe Road, Shirrel, Bellshill is not under the ownership of Scottish Ministers. The site is privately owned by individuals. Steps are being taken to update the Vacant and Derelict Land Register accordingly.