- Asked by: Elena Whitham, MSP for Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 22 April 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 9 May 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what consideration it has given to making food security impact assessments an immediate requirement for any application for largescale forestry expansion on productive agricultural land, in order to ensure that all productive land can be prioritised for food production rather than carbon offsetting by non-agricultural businesses.
Answer
The Scottish Government requires that where large scale forestry expansion is proposed, that may impact upon productive agricultural land, that consultation takes place between the applicant, Agriculture and Rural Economy (ARE) and Scottish Forestry (SF) colleagues. This ensures that potential impacts on agricultural productivity are examined and mitigated. This benefits integration with other patterns of land use and allows for the retention of agricultural enterprises. As a result of this approach, Scottish Government does not feel that additional food security impact assessments are necessary.
- Asked by: Rachael Hamilton, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 22 April 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 9 May 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what it is doing to increase sentencing for people who commit arson and cause damage to farms and rural communities.
Answer
Conduct amounting to ‘arson’ under Scots criminal law would be prosecuted under the criminal offences of wilful fire raising and culpable and reckless fire raising. As these are common law offences, the courts in Scotland have the ability to impose a wide range of sentences, up to and including life imprisonment.
As with all sentencing decisions, the level of sentence to issue in any given case is rightly a matter for the independent court, having regard to the individual facts and circumstances of each case and any factors the court may deem to be aggravating in nature. The Scottish Government supports courts having these wide-ranging powers in dealing with conduct amounting to arson.
The independent Scottish Sentencing Council also play a valuable role in guiding the court as to the core principles of sentencing and what sentences should be imposed in certain circumstances through the development of sentencing guidelines.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 08 April 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 9 May 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what the (a) original budget and (b) actual cost is for each of the Cycle One flood defence schemes that has been started but not completed.
Answer
The following schemes are under construction.
| (a) Initial cost (£ million) | (b)Estimated final cost (£ million) |
Broughty Ferry | 10.0 | 16.3 |
Upper Garnock | 15.5 | 18.5 |
Kirkintilloch - Park Burn | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Hawick | 37.4 | 78.6 |
Drumnadrochit | 3.4 | 5.7 |
Stonehaven | 19.9 | 27.5 |
Caol and Lochyside | 8.4 | 15.7 |
Initial costs as provided by local authorities in 2016-17. Final Scheme costs are the latest estimates provided by local authorities. Differences between these latest estimates and initial cost estimates arise because flood protection schemes are put forward for prioritisation at various stages of their development to fit with the flood risk management planning cycle set out in the Flood Risk Management (Scotland) Act 2009.
Costs are revised over time as designs are finalised and more detailed investigations are carried out, and as new information emerges. Outcomes from community engagement and changes to price and supply of materials may also require revisions to cost estimates.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 08 April 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 9 May 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether factors such as risk to life and potential impact on the economy of Ballater as a
tourist destination have been taken into account in reaching decisions regarding
funding granted through the flood defence schemes.
Answer
No final funding decisions have been made about actions or schemes proposed in the Flood Risk Management Plans published by SEPA in January 2021.
A joint Scottish Government/COSLA Flood Risk Management Working Group has been set up and is considering funding arrangements for flood risk management actions going forward. It will put recommendations to the joint Scottish Government/COSLA officers’ Settlement Distribution Group with Ministers and Council Leaders’ subsequently being provided with advice later in 2022.
The local flood risk management plans, which are due to be published by December 2022, will provide more detail on how the actions set out in the flood risk management plans for 2022-2028 will be delivered including who will lead them and how the actions will be coordinated with other organisations. They will also provide further information on when the actions will take place and how they will be funded.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 08 April 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 9 May 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what the total projected cost is of the new Cycle Two flood defence schemes proposed by SEPA.
Answer
Proposals for the schemes set out in the Flood Risk Management Plans are still at an early stage and it is not possible to provide a total projected cost at present. Costs are revised over time as designs are finalised and more detailed investigations are carried out, and as new information emerges.
- Asked by: Rona Mackay, MSP for Strathkelvin and Bearsden, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 05 May 2022
-
Current Status:
Initiated by the Scottish Government.
Answered by Maree Todd on 6 May 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, following the meeting between the Minister for Public Health, Women's Health and Sport and members of the Life After Essure support group, what actions it has decided to take to help raise awareness of the Essure contraceptive device and its possible complications among clinicians and patients in Scotland.
Answer
I can confirm that my officials and I met with members of the Life After Essure support group on 31 March. I was grateful for the opportunity to hear the experiences of the women first hand, and found the meeting very helpful.
What became clear was the need for a consistent approach for any women experiencing complications as a result of this device. As such, I can confirm that I have agreed to write to GPs and other relevant clinicians in order to highlight the concerns that have been raised. In addition, I have also undertaken to give consideration to what further action can be taken to ensure that there is increased awareness amongst both patients and clinicians.
I will be happy to provide further updates in due course.
- Asked by: Emma Roddick, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 03 May 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 6 May 2022
To ask the Scottish Government how much financial assistance has been provided through the Rural Tourism Infrastructure Fund to date, broken down by local authority.
Answer
Since its inception, the Rural Tourism Infrastructure Fund (RTIF), which was established to support critical infrastructure at rural pinch points, has provided £14.5 million of grant funding to support development of facilities such as car parks, waste disposal and toilet provision.
The fund has supported 66 projects across 15 local authorities and both national parks. A full list of successful applicants and projects are published online: Rural Development Fund - Funding | VisitScotland.org
RURAL TOURISM INFRASTRUCTURE FUND | |
|
| ROUND 1 - 4 TOTALS | |
APPLICANT | STAGE 2 APP No. | Total RTIF APP | % of Total | |
LOCH LOMOND & TROSSACHS NPA | 3 | 796,500 | 5.61 | |
CNPA | 2 | 244,098 | 1.72 | |
HIGHLAND COUNCIL | 29 | 5,373,269 | 37.82 | |
ARGYLL & BUTE COUNCIL | 6 | 1,454,327 | 10.24 | |
ABERDEENSHIRE COUNCIL | 4 | 1,089,549 | 7.67 | |
SHETLAND IS COUNCIL | 3 | 792,960 | 5.58 | |
STIRLING COUNCIL | 2 | 573,183 | 4.03 | |
CLACKMANNANSHIRE COUNCIL | 1 | 141,768 | 1.00 | |
COMHAIRLE NAN EILEAN SIAR | 1 | 230,000 | 1.62 | |
DUMF & GLLWY COUNCIL | 2 | 283,000 | 1.99 | |
FIFE COUNCIL | 1 | 380,000 | 2.67 | |
EAST LOTHIAN COUNCIL | 2 | 412,830 | 2.91 | |
ORKNEY IS COUNCIL | 1 | 260,000 | 1.83 | |
PERTH & KINROSS COUNCIL | 3 | 918,601 | 6.47 | |
MORAY COUNCIL | 2 | 426,565 | 3.00 | |
EDINBURGH CITY COUNCIL | 2 | 564,734 | 3.98 | |
SCOTTISH BORDERS COUNCIL | 1 | 93,403 | 0.66 | |
WEST LOTHIAN | 1 | 171,420 | 1.21 | |
TOTALS | 66 | 14,206,207 | 100 | |
AVERAGE | | 215,246 | | |
* Figures as of March 2022. Not including figures for the Design grants in Rounds 3 & 4 for projects which were ultimately unsuccessful or did not submit a full application
In addition to this £14.5m, preceding RTIF, there were three pilot projects designed to test the fund’s concept. These comprised: The Stones of Stenness (£80,000); Neist Point (£100,000) and the Fairy Pools (£340,000)
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 26 April 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 6 May 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what consideration it gave to the needs of blind and partially sighted people in developing National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4).
Answer
Improving equality and eliminating discrimination across Scotland is one of the six high level outcomes of National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4). In our draft NPF4, we sought to make clear that we want Scotland’s future places to support health, wellbeing and safety for all.
We are aware of concerns expressed by organisations such as The Royal National Institute for Blind People, suggesting that the policy on liveable places does not focus sufficiently on the needs of people with disabilities. We are currently considering the responses received to the consultation and how to make more explicit reference to a wider range of societal groups in the final version of NPF4, which will be presented to the Scottish Parliament for approval.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 21 April 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 6 May 2022
To ask the Scottish Government what information it has on the average length of time between someone in Scotland registering for the Homes for Ukraine scheme and being paired.
Answer
The Homes for Ukraine scheme offers two routes by which displaced people can match with hosts in Scotland. Through the Home Office private sponsor scheme, people match directly with hosts in Scotland and make an application on that basis. The requirement for people to match with a private sponsor before entering the UK undoubtedly delays their progress.
This is why the Scottish Government offered to become a ‘super sponsor’. Through the Scottish super sponsor scheme, people apply to come to Scotland without being required to find a host first. Once people are safely in Scotland, they are accommodated in temporary accommodation before being matched to long term accommodation that has been through appropriate safeguarding and suitability checks.
The length of time these processes take can vary on a case by case basis. The key determinate of time remains the pace at which visas are processed and issued. If the UK Government will not follow the example of the EU and waive the requirement for visas, then they must grant them quickly. We stand ready to welcome people when they arrive in Scotland.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 14 April 2022
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 6 May 2022
To ask the Scottish Government how the effectiveness of the Third National Planning Framework (NPF3) was monitored and evaluated and whether this was done against the outcomes set out in the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997.
Answer
In 2019 we published our National Planning Framework 3 (NPF3) Monitoring Report which reflected on progress across the 30 key actions and 14 national developments. NPF3 was published in 2014 so was not monitored against the 6 outcomes which were introduced by the Planning (Scotland) Act 2019.
We will work with key stakeholders to ensure monitoring for NPF4 is proportionate and effective.